Re: [PATCH 2/4] mm: Rename node_get_allowed_targets() to make it more explicit

["David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <david@kernel.org>]

On 3/12/26 06:28, Byungchul Park wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2026 at 12:02:41PM +0100, Alexandre Ghiti wrote:
>> This function actually returns the tier nodes that are targeted during a
>> demotion, so rename it to be more explicit.
>>
>> No functional change intended.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr>
>> ---
>>  include/linux/memory-tiers.h | 6 +++---
>>  mm/memory-tiers.c            | 4 ++--
>>  mm/vmscan.c                  | 2 +-
>>  3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/memory-tiers.h b/include/linux/memory-tiers.h
>> index 0bf0d002939e..ec39dc3c39e6 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/memory-tiers.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/memory-tiers.h
>> @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ struct memory_dev_type *mt_find_alloc_memory_type(int adist,
>>  void mt_put_memory_types(struct list_head *memory_types);
>>  #ifdef CONFIG_MIGRATION
>>  int next_demotion_node(int node, const nodemask_t *allowed_mask);
>> -void node_get_allowed_targets(pg_data_t *pgdat, nodemask_t *targets);
>> +void node_get_allowed_demotion_targets(pg_data_t *pgdat, nodemask_t *targets);
> 
> Look better than before to me.
> 
> What about just node_get_demotion_targets()?

+1

Maybe throw in the mt_ prefix and call it

mt_get_node_demotion_targets()

-- 
Cheers,

David