From: gio <giorgitchankvetadze1997@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, zhongjinji@honor.com
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, mhocko@suse.com, rientjes@google.com,
shakeel.butt@linux.dev, npache@redhat.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, dvhart@infradead.org,
dave@stgolabs.net, andrealmeid@igalia.com,
liam.howlett@oracle.com, liulu.liu@honor.com, feng.han@honor.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] mm/oom_kill: Have the OOM reaper and exit_mmap() traverse the maple tree in opposite orders
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2025 21:53:15 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0A987E18-9E43-4ED9-BE02-EFCD8D6BC528@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1CAF2012-C9A4-44E1-BEB1-A1ECE0BC0C3E@gmail.com>
I believe the patch should be accepted. While the race condition might be rare in simple workloads, it can become significant in containerized systems or Android devices. The proposed solution is simple, low-risk, and directly addresses the identified problem with minimal code changes.
On August 15, 2025 9:52:17 PM GMT+04:00, gio <giorgitchankvetadze1997@gmail.com> wrote:
>I believe the patch should be accepted. While the race condition might be rare in simple workloads, it can become significant in containerized systems or Android devices. The proposed solution is simple, low-risk, and directly addresses the identified problem with minimal code changes.
>
>On August 15, 2025 3:09:14 AM GMT+04:00, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>>On Thu, 14 Aug 2025 21:55:55 +0800 <zhongjinji@honor.com> wrote:
>>
>>> When a process is OOM killed, if the OOM reaper and the thread running
>>> exit_mmap() execute at the same time, both will traverse the vma's maple
>>> tree along the same path. They may easily unmap the same vma, causing them
>>> to compete for the pte spinlock. This increases unnecessary load, causing
>>> the execution time of the OOM reaper and the thread running exit_mmap() to
>>> increase.
>>
>>Please tell me what I'm missing here.
>>
>>OOM kills are a rare event. And this race sounds like it will rarely
>>occur even if an oom-killing is happening. And the delay will be
>>relatively short.
>>
>>If I'm correct then we're addressing rare*rare*small, so why bother?
>>
>>> When a process exits, exit_mmap() traverses the vma's maple tree from low to high
>>> address. To reduce the chance of unmapping the same vma simultaneously,
>>> the OOM reaper should traverse vma's tree from high to low address. This reduces
>>> lock contention when unmapping the same vma.
>>
>>Sharing some before-and-after runtime measurements would be useful. Or
>>at least, detailed anecdotes.
>>
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-15 17:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-14 13:55 [PATCH v4 0/3] mm/oom_kill: Only delay OOM reaper for processes using robust futexes zhongjinji
2025-08-14 13:55 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] futex: Introduce function process_has_robust_futex() zhongjinji
2025-08-14 13:55 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] mm/oom_kill: Only delay OOM reaper for processes using robust futexes zhongjinji
2025-08-15 14:41 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-08-18 14:14 ` zhongjinji
2025-08-17 19:37 ` Michal Hocko
2025-08-18 12:08 ` zhongjinji
2025-08-19 10:49 ` Michal Hocko
2025-08-20 2:53 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2025-08-21 18:13 ` Michal Hocko
2025-08-21 19:45 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2025-08-14 13:55 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] mm/oom_kill: Have the OOM reaper and exit_mmap() traverse the maple tree in opposite orders zhongjinji
2025-08-14 23:09 ` Andrew Morton
2025-08-15 16:32 ` zhongjinji
2025-08-15 17:52 ` gio
2025-08-15 17:53 ` gio [this message]
2025-08-15 14:29 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-08-15 15:01 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-08-15 17:37 ` zhongjinji
2025-08-19 15:18 ` zhongjinji
2025-08-21 9:32 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-08-25 14:12 ` zhongjinji
2025-08-15 14:41 ` Liam R. Howlett
2025-08-15 16:05 ` Liam R. Howlett
2025-08-14 23:13 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] mm/oom_kill: Only delay OOM reaper for processes using robust futexes Andrew Morton
2025-08-15 17:06 ` zhongjinji
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0A987E18-9E43-4ED9-BE02-EFCD8D6BC528@gmail.com \
--to=giorgitchankvetadze1997@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andrealmeid@igalia.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
--cc=feng.han@honor.com \
--cc=liam.howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=liulu.liu@honor.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=npache@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=zhongjinji@honor.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).