From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AC16C433F5 for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2022 03:49:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id CEF538D0001; Wed, 30 Mar 2022 23:49:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id C9EE76B0075; Wed, 30 Mar 2022 23:49:21 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id B67118D0001; Wed, 30 Mar 2022 23:49:21 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0207.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.207]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A52216B0074 for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2022 23:49:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin31.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay03.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D6748249980 for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2022 03:49:21 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 79303301322.31.9D58615 Received: from mail-pl1-f182.google.com (mail-pl1-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by imf24.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5257180006 for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2022 03:49:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pl1-f182.google.com with SMTP id i11so22315229plr.1 for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2022 20:49:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:cc:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=f9a8/jSLsAP43/Zszox61+3swgBvx/QRujNi2n4B5LA=; b=M03KA+QPS3ivvdvvEgAH+FnwzlXrcUMp8UJpLI+8qRqI6odoWPYmSQ5dQt4fgWt2Dr 4SzbojaSvnlOyBkFWL8+vH3SDuLMjJe1ZB3NY3egkCSs4oZt7+jOW4SdG5qBszNw+HdQ cqxsQyOIrpaBjcbBZO/dDARaMhyOaBG5NBZL/nxJr5hSJwYoxuetk3a9jbfg0f+e3pWQ qs9sK8658sG3srAnKwSO6k5/LQ1YvzU6n/8GL7eivWuWYp813Llnqkvicj//JJxkN6c3 pivax/GIJv/KlPnm4mDL6waZnGKf6A7HwWoIpt7ISA1PXF5+m9wUI48Oi4lipHt0tLH0 ACXQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533XniQJkxd5i+QvG9hj7VBgjOqyLFcBd0CA7yETDD3H58t9C913 tWJin5xQlaJwy+N7es6GE+M= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwA9iGDZBPyhWb8A78ChnUp2lOzN/Gaq7u4GT3McHz+zuxs5OxmB6tDAoGbAiYRV0c8MGxlEg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:fd13:b0:1c9:ee13:d122 with SMTP id cv19-20020a17090afd1300b001c9ee13d122mr3716430pjb.226.1648698559613; Wed, 30 Mar 2022 20:49:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPV6:2601:647:4000:d7:feaa:14ff:fe9d:6dbd? ([2601:647:4000:d7:feaa:14ff:fe9d:6dbd]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a32-20020a631a20000000b003756899829csm20415133pga.58.2022.03.30.20.49.17 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 30 Mar 2022 20:49:18 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <0c3b9efe-018b-7d60-7226-c93cafc0de3e@acm.org> Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2022 20:49:17 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.7.0 Subject: Re: [LSF/MM/BPF TOPIC] block drivers in user space Content-Language: en-US To: Ming Lei , Gabriel Krisman Bertazi Cc: Hannes Reinecke , lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Xiaoguang Wang , linux-mm@kvack.org References: <87tucsf0sr.fsf@collabora.com> <986caf55-65d1-0755-383b-73834ec04967@suse.de> <87o81prfrg.fsf@collabora.com> <87bkxor7ye.fsf@collabora.com> <87tubfpag3.fsf@collabora.com> From: Bart Van Assche In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Stat-Signature: 335sfpskp1tapy974n1rp5heoor548zk X-Rspamd-Server: rspam07 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: D5257180006 Authentication-Results: imf24.hostedemail.com; dkim=none; spf=pass (imf24.hostedemail.com: domain of bart.vanassche@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.182 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bart.vanassche@gmail.com; dmarc=none X-Rspam-User: X-HE-Tag: 1648698560-898579 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On 3/30/22 18:38, Ming Lei wrote: > The topic has been discussed for a bit long, and looks people are still > interested in it, so I prefer to send out patches on linux-block if no > one objects. Then we can still discuss further when reviewing patches. I'm in favor of the above proposal :-) Bart.