From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linuxfoundation.org>,
David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>,
"Jason@zx2c4.com" <Jason@zx2c4.com>,
"pedro.falcato@gmail.com" <pedro.falcato@gmail.com>,
Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] minmax: reduce compilation time
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2024 10:36:30 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0c5b8177-3602-4840-8956-6196a6175c04@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1d87456d-b565-410f-bf4b-91fe5704617c@lucifer.local>
On 7/27/24 10:31 AM, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 27, 2024 at 09:38:54AM GMT, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 7/27/24 9:30 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>> On 7/26/24 4:48 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>>>> I didn't even look at what the issue was with the
>>>> bio_for_each_segment() expansion, in the hope that Jens will make that
>>>> one look better.
>>>
>>> I did take a quick look, pretty obviously bvec_iter_bvec() which makes
>>> it horrible, which came from Kent's immutable work quite a while ago.
>>> Not sure yet what to do about it, will spend some time on this next
>>> week.
>>
>> Maybe something like this, totally untested...
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/bvec.h b/include/linux/bvec.h
>> index f41c7f0ef91e..9ccccddadde2 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/bvec.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/bvec.h
>> @@ -130,12 +130,15 @@ struct bvec_iter_all {
>> (mp_bvec_iter_page((bvec), (iter)) + \
>> mp_bvec_iter_page_idx((bvec), (iter)))
>>
>> -#define bvec_iter_bvec(bvec, iter) \
>> -((struct bio_vec) { \
>> - .bv_page = bvec_iter_page((bvec), (iter)), \
>> - .bv_len = bvec_iter_len((bvec), (iter)), \
>> - .bv_offset = bvec_iter_offset((bvec), (iter)), \
>> -})
>> +static inline struct bio_vec bvec_iter_bvec(struct bio_vec *bv,
>> + struct bvec_iter iter)
>> +{
>> + return (struct bio_vec) {
>> + .bv_page = bvec_iter_page(bv, iter),
>> + .bv_len = bvec_iter_len(bv, iter),
>> + .bv_offset = bvec_iter_offset(bv, iter)
>> + };
>> +}
>>
>> static inline bool bvec_iter_advance(const struct bio_vec *bv,
>> struct bvec_iter *iter, unsigned bytes)
>>
>> --
>> Jens Axboe
>>
>
> I tried this patch, doesn't seem to make a huge difference, going from
> 3,958,564 bytes with longest line of 82 kB to 3,943,824 bytes with a
> longest line of 77kB.
>
> It seems that the .bv_len = ... expansion is what's doing it, so I tried
> patching mp_bvec_iter_len() as well to do a silly ?: thing (sorry), which
> takes us down to 3,880,309 with longest line of 20kB.
Right, I did compile it after the fact and applied the same thing to
mp_bvec_iter_len().
> This is starting to feel like whack-a-mole isn't it? I looked at the next
> longest line, which originates from include/linux/pid_namespace.h believe
> it or not where some compiler cleverness + a loop is resulting in _another_
> combinatorial explosion.
Oh it's certainly whack-a-mole, doesn't mean it's not worth doing for
the low hanging stuff :-)
> Patch attached including Jens's change + mine.
bvec side matches what I have here, fwiw, except I also did
mp_bvec_iter_len(). Didn't see big expansion there, but might as well
keep them consistent.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-27 16:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-24 14:26 [PATCH 0/7] minmax: reduce compilation time David Laight
2024-07-24 14:28 ` [PATCH 1/7] minmax: Put all the clamp() definitions together David Laight
2024-07-24 14:29 ` [PATCH 2/7] minmax: Use _Static_assert() instead of static_assert() David Laight
2024-07-24 14:29 ` [PATCH 3/7] compiler.h: Add __if_constexpr(expr, if_const, if_not_const) David Laight
2024-07-24 17:32 ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-07-25 9:12 ` David Laight
2024-07-24 19:48 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-07-25 8:45 ` David Laight
2024-07-24 14:30 ` [PATCH 4/7] minmax: Simplify signedness check David Laight
2024-07-24 16:48 ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-07-24 20:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-07-25 9:00 ` David Laight
2024-07-25 17:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-07-26 9:43 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2024-07-26 12:57 ` David Laight
2024-07-26 13:27 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2024-07-25 13:24 ` kernel test robot
2024-07-25 16:39 ` David Laight
2024-07-24 14:31 ` [PATCH 5/7] minmax: Factor out the zero-extension logic from umin/umax David Laight
2024-07-24 14:32 ` [PATCH 6/7] minmax: Optimise _Static_assert() check in clamp() David Laight
2024-07-24 14:33 ` [PATCH 7/7] minmax: minmax: Add __types_ok3() and optimise defines with 3 arguments David Laight
2024-07-24 17:03 ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-07-25 9:07 ` David Laight
2024-07-24 19:34 ` [PATCH 0/7] minmax: reduce compilation time Lorenzo Stoakes
2024-07-24 19:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-07-26 18:12 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2024-07-26 18:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-07-26 18:56 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2024-07-26 19:21 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2024-07-26 21:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-07-26 21:46 ` Jens Axboe
2024-07-26 22:48 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-07-27 15:30 ` Jens Axboe
2024-07-27 15:38 ` Jens Axboe
2024-07-27 16:31 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2024-07-27 16:36 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2024-07-27 16:41 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2024-07-27 16:52 ` Jens Axboe
2024-07-27 16:56 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2024-07-28 11:32 ` David Laight
2024-07-27 4:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-07-27 4:14 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-07-27 8:08 ` David Laight
2024-07-27 18:58 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2024-07-27 19:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-07-28 11:17 ` David Laight
2024-07-28 13:07 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2024-07-27 17:33 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-07-27 18:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-07-27 8:07 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2024-07-27 16:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-07-27 18:44 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2024-07-30 4:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-07-30 10:36 ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-07-28 17:57 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2024-07-28 18:43 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2024-07-26 21:32 ` David Laight
2024-07-26 21:38 ` Linus Torvalds
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0c5b8177-3602-4840-8956-6196a6175c04@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=David.Laight@aculab.com \
--cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=arnd@kernel.org \
--cc=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=mjguzik@gmail.com \
--cc=pedro.falcato@gmail.com \
--cc=torvalds@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox