From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67B77C433EF for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 17:07:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id C837A6B0095; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 12:07:01 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id C32F36B0098; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 12:07:01 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id AFA7C6B0099; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 12:07:01 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0239.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.239]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2AD26B0095 for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 12:07:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin17.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay04.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60D80886C3 for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 17:07:01 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 78942431442.17.060F653 Received: from serv108.segi.ulg.ac.be (serv108.segi.ulg.ac.be [139.165.32.111]) by imf24.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54A59180052 for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 17:06:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mbx12-zne.ulg.ac.be (serv470.segi.ulg.ac.be [139.165.32.199]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by serv108.segi.ulg.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E632B200BE63; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 18:06:39 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 serv108.segi.ulg.ac.be E632B200BE63 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=uliege.be; s=ulg20190529; t=1640106399; bh=CqnTppCRL/Z3iguzsQkfLaxXmal+39aqeE7ldFtTgQI=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From; b=giuH0XxfSdHffbcmLMHLKXCfnbus4h1hL/64gFa9pEFEEgMh6f8zW6sCktRyA+OX2 LaPhz8Ngqe9GeiVI+XgMJObu+LVZe4QCe8woeXFZa7/4rQPhC67QLwVt5z5Lttm7ks eCOLsWwRSf9pn8lW6lV6WQkjzXz6zO3nKAG0RWBD9IWgId+diAAVJCHTkxoeHiSWC4 rTyI582pB3HAqunyyOY1007bL4ZLs1E3WVopl5QbGTEs0Z0G2XK/syOjnriIHovpUK ekW/d6nBhkUWYhcbRfYocu9nBO++c0DzvQi6a0J+UoAFjZqPRCEm6dOZ5o7CrW55ES +5neRAQDe/lew== Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mbx12-zne.ulg.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3A0A603B0F5E; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 18:06:39 +0100 (CET) Received: from mbx12-zne.ulg.ac.be ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mbx12-zne.ulg.ac.be [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id gTTgnXttnc-k; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 18:06:39 +0100 (CET) Received: from mbx12-zne.ulg.ac.be (mbx12-zne.ulg.ac.be [139.165.32.199]) by mbx12-zne.ulg.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABD0D6008D821; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 18:06:39 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2021 18:06:39 +0100 (CET) From: Justin Iurman Reply-To: Justin Iurman To: Jakub Kicinski Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, dsahern@kernel.org, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, cl@linux.com, penberg@kernel.org, rientjes@google.com, iamjoonsoo kim , akpm@linux-foundation.org, vbabka@suse.cz, Roopa Prabhu , Nikolay Aleksandrov , Andrew Lunn , Stephen Hemminger , Vladimir Oltean , Florian Fainelli , Florian Westphal , Paolo Abeni Message-ID: <1065685246.241690721.1640106399663.JavaMail.zimbra@uliege.be> In-Reply-To: <20211209163828.223815bd@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com> References: <20211206211758.19057-1-justin.iurman@uliege.be> <20211207075037.6cda8832@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com> <1045511371.220520131.1638894949373.JavaMail.zimbra@uliege.be> <20211207090700.55725775@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com> <1665643630.220612437.1638900313011.JavaMail.zimbra@uliege.be> <20211208141825.3091923c@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com> <1067680364.223350225.1639059024535.JavaMail.zimbra@uliege.be> <20211209163828.223815bd@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com> Subject: Re: [RFC net-next 2/2] ipv6: ioam: Support for Buffer occupancy data field MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [81.240.24.148] X-Mailer: Zimbra 8.8.15_GA_4018 (ZimbraWebClient - FF95 (Linux)/8.8.15_GA_4026) Thread-Topic: ipv6: ioam: Support for Buffer occupancy data field Thread-Index: cXzyaHe7M6fBsCgL0fZBmOJtzfWNjg== Authentication-Results: imf24.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=uliege.be header.s=ulg20190529 header.b=giuH0Xxf; spf=pass (imf24.hostedemail.com: domain of justin.iurman@uliege.be designates 139.165.32.111 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=justin.iurman@uliege.be; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=uliege.be X-Rspamd-Server: rspam06 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 54A59180052 X-Stat-Signature: c1rq6in5dd11ky5b9iqp3mw8qo36xe8t X-HE-Tag: 1640106399-713378 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Dec 10, 2021, at 1:38 AM, Jakub Kicinski kuba@kernel.org wrote: > [...] > I think we're on the same page, the main problem is I've not seen > anyone use the skbuff_head_cache occupancy as a signal in practice. > > I'm adding a bunch of people to the CC list, hopefully someone has > an opinion one way or the other. It looks like we won't have more opinions on that, unfortunately. @Jakub - Should I submit it as a PATCH and see if we receive more feedback there?