Re: [PATCH]: Free pages from local pcp lists under tight memory conditions

Christoph Lameter
2005-11-23T21:25:50Z

On Wed, 23 Nov 2005, Rohit Seth wrote:

> I thought Nick et.al came up with some of the constant values like batch
> size to tackle the page coloring issue specifically. In any case, I
> think one of the key difference between 2.4 and 2.6 allocators is the
> pcp list. And even with the minuscule batch and high watermarks this is
> helping ordinary benchmarks (by reducing the variation from run to run).

Could you share some benchmark results?