From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Nick Piggin <piggin@cyberone.com.au>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
clameter@sgi.com, torvalds@osdl.org, ak@suse.de,
rohitseth@google.com, mbligh@google.com, hugh@veritas.com,
riel@redhat.com, andrea@suse.de, arjan@infradead.org,
apw@shadowen.org, mel@csn.ul.ie, marcelo@kvack.org,
anton@samba.org, paulmck@us.ibm.com, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/3] tracking dirty pages in shared mappings -V4
Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 10:52:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1147423961.8951.26.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44644196.9070402@cyberone.com.au>
On Fri, 2006-05-12 at 18:04 +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:
> Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> >On Thu, 2006-05-11 at 21:30 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> >>Nick Piggin <piggin@cyberone.com.au> wrote:
> >>
> >>> >So let's see. We take a write fault, we mark the page dirty then we return
> >>> >to userspace which will proceed with the write and will mark the pte dirty.
> >>> >
> >>> >Later, the VM will write the page out.
> >>> >
> >>> >Later still, the pte will get cleaned by reclaim or by munmap or whatever
> >>> >and the page will be marked dirty and the page will again be written out.
> >>> >Potentially needlessly.
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>> page_wrprotect also marks the page clean,
> >>>
> >>Oh. I missed that when reading the comment which describes
> >>page_wrprotect() (I do go on).
> >>
> >
> >Yes, this name is not the best of names :-(
> >
> >I was aware of this, but since in my mind the counting through
> >protection
> >faults was the prime idea, I stuck to page_wrprotect().
> >
> >But I'm hard pressed to come up with a better one. Nick proposes:
> > page_mkclean()
> >But that also doesn't cover the whole of it from my perspective.
> >
>
> What's your perspective?
>
> With mmap shared accounting, the _whole VM's_ perspective is that clean
> MAP_SHARED ptes are marked readonly.
>
> The logical operation is marking the page's ptes clean. The VM mechanism
> also marks the ptes readonly as a side effect of that. Think about it:
> writeback does not want to make the page write protected, it wants to make
> it clean.
As said, I was looking at the added functionality on its own; that is,
counting dirty pages by trapping write faults.
However your view; the big picture; does make more sense. I shall
rename.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-05-12 8:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-05-05 20:35 [RFC][PATCH] tracking dirty pages in shared mappings Peter Zijlstra
2006-05-06 13:18 ` Nick Piggin
2006-05-06 13:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2006-05-06 13:47 ` Nick Piggin
2006-05-06 15:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2006-05-07 0:40 ` Nick Piggin
2006-05-07 3:43 ` Nick Piggin
2006-05-08 6:43 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-05-08 7:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2006-05-08 19:20 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/2] tracking dirty pages in shared mappings -V3 Peter Zijlstra
2006-05-09 5:41 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-05-09 6:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2006-05-09 20:44 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/3] tracking dirty pages in shared mappings -V4 Peter Zijlstra
2006-05-09 20:52 ` Peter Chubb
2006-05-09 20:55 ` Martin Bligh
2006-05-09 22:56 ` Brian Twichell
2006-05-10 0:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-05-10 0:29 ` Nick Piggin
2006-05-10 1:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-05-11 15:02 ` Andrew Morton
2006-05-11 16:39 ` Andy Whitcroft
2006-05-11 22:52 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-05-11 23:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-05-11 23:44 ` Andrew Morton
2006-05-12 0:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-05-12 8:07 ` Andy Whitcroft
2006-05-12 14:25 ` Martin J. Bligh
2006-05-14 15:58 ` Andy Whitcroft
2006-05-12 1:51 ` Nick Piggin
2006-05-12 4:30 ` Andrew Morton
2006-05-12 5:05 ` Nick Piggin
2006-05-12 7:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2006-05-12 8:04 ` Nick Piggin
2006-05-12 8:52 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2006-05-12 8:07 ` Nick Piggin
2006-05-12 4:51 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-05-09 20:44 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/3] throttle writers of shared mappings Peter Zijlstra
2006-05-09 22:54 ` Nick Piggin
2006-05-09 22:55 ` Nick Piggin
2006-05-10 6:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2006-05-09 20:44 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/3] optimize follow_pages() Peter Zijlstra
2006-05-10 6:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2006-05-08 19:24 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/2] throttle writers of shared mappings Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1147423961.8951.26.camel@twins \
--to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=andrea@suse.de \
--cc=anton@samba.org \
--cc=apw@shadowen.org \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=marcelo@kvack.org \
--cc=mbligh@google.com \
--cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
--cc=paulmck@us.ibm.com \
--cc=piggin@cyberone.com.au \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=rohitseth@google.com \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).