linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>
To: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>,
	wli@holomorphy.com, melgor@ie.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, agl@us.ibm.com, pj@sgi.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/5] hugetlb: fix cpuset-constrained pool resizing
Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2007 09:26:38 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1186579598.5055.11.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070808015042.GF15714@us.ibm.com>

On Tue, 2007-08-07 at 18:50 -0700, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
<snip>
> Finally, after my hugetlb interleave dequeue patch is applied:
> 
> /cpuset ~
> Trying to resize the pool to     200 from the top cpuset
> Node 3 HugePages_Free:     50
> Node 2 HugePages_Free:     50
> Node 1 HugePages_Free:     50
> Node 0 HugePages_Free:     50
> Done.     200 free
> Trying to resize the pool back to     100 from the top cpuset
> Node 3 HugePages_Free:     25
> Node 2 HugePages_Free:     25
> Node 1 HugePages_Free:     25
> Node 0 HugePages_Free:     25
> Done.     100 free
> /cpuset/set1 /cpuset ~
> Trying to resize the pool to     200 from a cpuset restricted to node 1
> Node 3 HugePages_Free:     50
> Node 2 HugePages_Free:     50
> Node 1 HugePages_Free:     50
> Node 0 HugePages_Free:     50
> Done.     200 free
> Trying to shrink the pool down to 0 from a cpuset restricted to node 1
> Node 3 HugePages_Free:      0
> Node 2 HugePages_Free:      0
> Node 1 HugePages_Free:      0
> Node 0 HugePages_Free:      0
> Done.       0 free

That's the behavior I'd like to see!!!

> 
> So, it would appear that, in your opinion, this set of patches
> constitutes a pseudo-bug-fix? Without the last patch, it seems, cpusets
> are able to constrain what nodes a root process can remove hugepages
> from.
> 
> Thanks,
> Nish
> 

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2007-08-08 13:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-08-06 16:32 [RFC][PATCH 0/5] hugetlb NUMA improvements Nishanth Aravamudan
2007-08-06 16:37 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/5] Fix hugetlb pool allocation with empty nodes V9 Nishanth Aravamudan
2007-08-06 16:38   ` [RFC][PATCH 2/5] hugetlb: numafy several functions Nishanth Aravamudan
2007-08-06 16:40     ` [RFC][PATCH 3/5] hugetlb: add per-node nr_hugepages sysfs attribute Nishanth Aravamudan
2007-08-06 16:44       ` [RFC][PATCH 4/5] hugetlb: fix cpuset-constrained pool resizing Nishanth Aravamudan
2007-08-06 16:45         ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2007-08-06 16:48         ` [RFC][PATCH 5/5] hugetlb: interleave dequeueing of huge pages Nishanth Aravamudan
2007-08-06 18:04         ` [RFC][PATCH 4/5] hugetlb: fix cpuset-constrained pool resizing Christoph Lameter
2007-08-06 18:26           ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2007-08-06 18:41             ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-07  0:03               ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2007-08-06 19:37           ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-08-08  1:50           ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2007-08-08 13:26             ` Lee Schermerhorn [this message]
2007-08-06 17:59     ` [RFC][PATCH 2/5] hugetlb: numafy several functions Christoph Lameter
2007-08-06 18:15       ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2007-08-07  0:34         ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2007-08-06 18:00   ` [RFC][PATCH 1/5] Fix hugetlb pool allocation with empty nodes V9 Christoph Lameter
2007-08-06 18:19     ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2007-08-06 18:37       ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-06 19:52         ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-08-06 20:15           ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-07  0:04             ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2007-08-06 16:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/5] hugetlb NUMA improvements Nishanth Aravamudan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1186579598.5055.11.camel@localhost \
    --to=lee.schermerhorn@hp.com \
    --cc=agl@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=clameter@sgi.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=melgor@ie.ibm.com \
    --cc=nacc@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=pj@sgi.com \
    --cc=wli@holomorphy.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).