From: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
To: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, ak@suse.de,
mtk-manpages@gmx.net, clameter@sgi.com, solo@google.com,
eric.whitney@hp.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC 1/5] Mem Policy: fix reference counting
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 19:48:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1189536502.32731.83.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070830185100.22619.197.sendpatchset@localhost>
You know this stuff better than I do. Take suggestions here with a large
grain of salt.
On Thu, 2007-08-30 at 14:51 -0400, Lee Schermerhorn wrote:
> PATCHRFC 1/5 Memory Policy: fix reference counting
>
> Against 2.6.23-rc3-mm1
>
> This patch proposes fixes to the reference counting of memory policy
> in the page allocation paths and in show_numa_map().
>
> Shared policy lookup [shmem] has always added a reference to the
> policy, but this was never unrefed after page allocation or after
> formatting the numa map data.
>
> Default system policy should not require additional ref counting,
> nor should the current task's task policy. However, show_numa_map()
> calls get_vma_policy() to examine what may be [likely is] another
> task's policy. The latter case needs protection against freeing
> of the policy.
>
> This patch adds a reference count to a mempolicy returned by
> get_vma_policy() when the policy is a vma policy or another
> task's mempolicy. Again, shared policy is already reference
> counted on lookup. A matching "unref" [__mpol_free()] is performed
> in alloc_page_vma() for shared and vma policies, and in
> show_numa_map() for shared and another task's mempolicy.
> We can call __mpol_free() directly, saving an admittedly
> inexpensive inline NULL test, because we know we have a non-NULL
> policy.
>
> Handling policy ref counts for hugepages is a bit tricker.
> huge_zonelist() returns a zone list that might come from a
> shared or vma 'BIND policy. In this case, we should hold the
> reference until after the huge page allocation in
> dequeue_hugepage(). The patch modifies huge_zonelist() to
> return a pointer to the mempolicy if it needs to be unref'd
> after allocation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com>
>
> include/linux/mempolicy.h | 4 +-
> mm/hugetlb.c | 4 +-
> mm/mempolicy.c | 79 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> 3 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> Index: Linux/mm/mempolicy.c
> ===================================================================
> --- Linux.orig/mm/mempolicy.c 2007-08-29 10:05:19.000000000 -0400
> +++ Linux/mm/mempolicy.c 2007-08-29 13:31:42.000000000 -0400
> @@ -1083,21 +1083,37 @@ asmlinkage long compat_sys_mbind(compat_
>
> #endif
>
> -/* Return effective policy for a VMA */
> +/*
> + * get_vma_policy(@task, @vma, @addr)
> + * @task - task for fallback if vma policy == default
> + * @vma - virtual memory area whose policy is sought
> + * @addr - address in @vma for shared policy lookup
> + *
> + * Returns effective policy for a VMA at specified address.
> + * Falls back to @task or system default policy, as necessary.
> + * Returned policy has extra reference count if shared, vma,
> + * or some other task's policy [show_numa_maps() can pass
> + * @task != current]. It is the caller's responsibility to
> + * free the reference in these cases.
> + */
> static struct mempolicy * get_vma_policy(struct task_struct *task,
> struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr)
> {
> struct mempolicy *pol = task->mempolicy;
> + int shared_pol = 0;
>
> if (vma) {
> - if (vma->vm_ops && vma->vm_ops->get_policy)
> + if (vma->vm_ops && vma->vm_ops->get_policy) {
> pol = vma->vm_ops->get_policy(vma, addr);
> - else if (vma->vm_policy &&
> + shared_pol = 1; /* if pol non-NULL, that is */
What do you mean here by "pol non-NULL, that is". Where do you check
that vm_ops->get_policy() returned a non-NULL value?
Should the comment be
/* Policy if set is shared, check later */
and rename the variable to check_shared_pol?
> + } else if (vma->vm_policy &&
> vma->vm_policy->policy != MPOL_DEFAULT)
> pol = vma->vm_policy;
> }
> if (!pol)
> pol = &default_policy;
> + else if (!shared_pol && pol != current->mempolicy)
> + mpol_get(pol); /* vma or other task's policy */
> return pol;
> }
>
> @@ -1213,19 +1229,45 @@ static inline unsigned interleave_nid(st
> }
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_HUGETLBFS
> -/* Return a zonelist suitable for a huge page allocation. */
> +/*
> + * huge_zonelist(@vma, @addr, @gfp_flags, @mpol)
> + * @vma = virtual memory area whose policy is sought
> + * @addr = address in @vma for shared policy lookup and interleave policy
> + * @gfp_flags = for requested zone
> + * @mpol = pointer to mempolicy pointer for reference counted 'BIND policy
> + *
> + * Returns a zonelist suitable for a huge page allocation.
> + * If the effective policy is 'BIND, returns pointer to policy's zonelist.
This comment here becomes redundant if applied on top of one-zonelist as
you suggest you will be doing later. The zonelist returned for MPOL_BIND
is the nodes zonelist but it is filtered based on a nodemask.
> + * If it is also a policy for which get_vma_policy() returns an extra
> + * reference, we must hold that reference until after allocation.
> + * In that case, return policy via @mpol so hugetlb allocation can drop
> + * the reference. For non-'BIND referenced policies, we can/do drop the
> + * reference here, so the caller doesn't need to know about the special case
> + * for default and current task policy.
> + */
> struct zonelist *huge_zonelist(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
> - gfp_t gfp_flags)
> + gfp_t gfp_flags, struct mempolicy **mpol)
> {
> struct mempolicy *pol = get_vma_policy(current, vma, addr);
> + struct zonelist *zl;
>
> + *mpol = NULL; /* probably no unref needed */
> if (pol->policy == MPOL_INTERLEAVE) {
> unsigned nid;
>
> nid = interleave_nid(pol, vma, addr, HPAGE_SHIFT);
> + __mpol_free(pol);
So, __mpol_free() here acts as a put on the get_vma_policy() right?
Either that needs commenting or __mpol_free() needs to be renamed to
__mpol_put() assuming that when the count reaches 0, it really gets
free.
> return NODE_DATA(nid)->node_zonelists + gfp_zone(gfp_flags);
> }
> - return zonelist_policy(GFP_HIGHUSER, pol);
> +
> + zl = zonelist_policy(GFP_HIGHUSER, pol);
> + if (unlikely(pol != &default_policy && pol != current->mempolicy)) {
> + if (pol->policy != MPOL_BIND)
> + __mpol_free(pol); /* finished with pol */
> + else
> + *mpol = pol; /* unref needed after allocation */
> + }
> + return zl;
> }
> #endif
>
> @@ -1270,6 +1312,7 @@ struct page *
> alloc_page_vma(gfp_t gfp, struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr)
> {
> struct mempolicy *pol = get_vma_policy(current, vma, addr);
> + struct zonelist *zl;
>
> cpuset_update_task_memory_state();
>
> @@ -1279,7 +1322,19 @@ alloc_page_vma(gfp_t gfp, struct vm_area
> nid = interleave_nid(pol, vma, addr, PAGE_SHIFT);
> return alloc_page_interleave(gfp, 0, nid);
> }
> - return __alloc_pages(gfp, 0, zonelist_policy(gfp, pol));
> + zl = zonelist_policy(gfp, pol);
> + if (pol != &default_policy && pol != current->mempolicy) {
> + /*
> + * slow path: ref counted policy -- shared or vma
> + */
> + struct page *page = __alloc_pages(gfp, 0, zl);
> + __mpol_free(pol);
> + return page;
> + }
> + /*
> + * fast path: default or task policy
> + */
> + return __alloc_pages(gfp, 0, zl);
> }
>
> /**
> @@ -1878,6 +1933,7 @@ int show_numa_map(struct seq_file *m, vo
> struct numa_maps *md;
> struct file *file = vma->vm_file;
> struct mm_struct *mm = vma->vm_mm;
> + struct mempolicy *pol;
> int n;
> char buffer[50];
>
> @@ -1888,8 +1944,13 @@ int show_numa_map(struct seq_file *m, vo
> if (!md)
> return 0;
>
> - mpol_to_str(buffer, sizeof(buffer),
> - get_vma_policy(priv->task, vma, vma->vm_start));
> + pol = get_vma_policy(priv->task, vma, vma->vm_start);
> + mpol_to_str(buffer, sizeof(buffer), pol);
> + /*
> + * unref shared or other task's mempolicy
> + */
> + if (pol != &default_policy && pol != current->mempolicy)
> + __mpol_free(pol);
>
> seq_printf(m, "%08lx %s", vma->vm_start, buffer);
>
> Index: Linux/include/linux/mempolicy.h
> ===================================================================
> --- Linux.orig/include/linux/mempolicy.h 2007-08-29 10:56:14.000000000 -0400
> +++ Linux/include/linux/mempolicy.h 2007-08-29 13:32:05.000000000 -0400
> @@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ extern void mpol_fix_fork_child_flag(str
>
> extern struct mempolicy default_policy;
> extern struct zonelist *huge_zonelist(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> - unsigned long addr, gfp_t gfp_flags);
> + unsigned long addr, gfp_t gfp_flags, struct mempolicy **mpol);
> extern unsigned slab_node(struct mempolicy *policy);
>
> extern enum zone_type policy_zone;
> @@ -238,7 +238,7 @@ static inline void mpol_fix_fork_child_f
> }
>
> static inline struct zonelist *huge_zonelist(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> - unsigned long addr, gfp_t gfp_flags)
> + unsigned long addr, gfp_t gfp_flags, struct mempolicy **mpol)
> {
> return NODE_DATA(0)->node_zonelists + gfp_zone(gfp_flags);
> }
> Index: Linux/mm/hugetlb.c
> ===================================================================
> --- Linux.orig/mm/hugetlb.c 2007-08-29 10:56:13.000000000 -0400
> +++ Linux/mm/hugetlb.c 2007-08-29 13:19:39.000000000 -0400
> @@ -71,8 +71,9 @@ static struct page *dequeue_huge_page(st
> {
> int nid;
> struct page *page = NULL;
> + struct mempolicy *mpol;
> struct zonelist *zonelist = huge_zonelist(vma, address,
> - htlb_alloc_mask);
> + htlb_alloc_mask, &mpol);
> struct zone **z;
>
> for (z = zonelist->zones; *z; z++) {
> @@ -87,6 +88,7 @@ static struct page *dequeue_huge_page(st
> break;
> }
> }
> + mpol_free(mpol); /* maybe need unref */
> return page;
> }
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-09-11 18:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 76+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-30 18:50 [PATCH/RFC 0/5] Memory Policy Cleanups and Enhancements Lee Schermerhorn
2007-08-30 18:51 ` [PATCH/RFC 1/5] Mem Policy: fix reference counting Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-11 18:48 ` Mel Gorman [this message]
2007-09-11 18:12 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-13 9:45 ` Mel Gorman
2007-08-30 18:51 ` [PATCH/RFC 2/5] Mem Policy: Use MPOL_PREFERRED for system-wide default policy Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-11 18:54 ` Mel Gorman
2007-09-11 18:22 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-13 9:48 ` Mel Gorman
2007-08-30 18:51 ` [PATCH/RFC 3/5] Mem Policy: MPOL_PREFERRED fixups for "local allocation" Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-11 18:58 ` Mel Gorman
2007-09-11 18:34 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-12 22:10 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-09-13 13:51 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-13 18:18 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-09-13 9:55 ` Mel Gorman
2007-09-12 22:06 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-09-13 13:35 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-13 18:21 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-30 18:51 ` [PATCH/RFC 4/5] Mem Policy: cpuset-independent interleave policy Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-12 21:20 ` Ethan Solomita
2007-09-12 22:14 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-09-13 13:26 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-13 17:17 ` Ethan Solomita
2007-09-12 21:59 ` Ethan Solomita
2007-09-13 13:32 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-13 17:19 ` Ethan Solomita
2007-09-13 18:20 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-10-09 6:15 ` Ethan Solomita
2007-10-09 13:39 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-10-09 18:49 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-10-09 19:02 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-08-30 18:51 ` [PATCH/RFC 5/5] Mem Policy: add MPOL_F_MEMS_ALLOWED get_mempolicy() flag Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-11 19:07 ` Mel Gorman
2007-09-11 18:42 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-12 22:14 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-09-14 20:24 ` [PATCH] " Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-14 20:27 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-09-11 16:20 ` [PATCH/RFC 0/5] Memory Policy Cleanups and Enhancements Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-11 19:12 ` Mel Gorman
2007-09-11 18:45 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-12 22:17 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-09-13 13:57 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-13 15:31 ` Mel Gorman
2007-09-13 15:01 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-13 18:55 ` Mel Gorman
2007-09-13 18:19 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-09-13 18:23 ` Mel Gorman
2007-09-13 18:26 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-09-13 21:17 ` Andrew Morton
2007-09-14 2:20 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-09-14 8:53 ` Mel Gorman
2007-09-14 15:06 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-14 17:46 ` Mel Gorman
2007-09-14 18:41 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-09-16 18:02 ` Mel Gorman
2007-09-17 18:12 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-09-17 18:19 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-09-17 20:14 ` Mel Gorman
2007-09-17 19:16 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-09-17 20:03 ` Mel Gorman
2007-09-14 20:15 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-16 18:05 ` Mel Gorman
2007-09-16 19:34 ` Andrew Morton
2007-09-16 21:22 ` Mel Gorman
2007-09-17 13:29 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-17 18:14 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-09-13 15:49 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-13 18:22 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-09-17 19:00 ` [PATCH] Fix NUMA Memory Policy Reference Counting Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-17 19:14 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-09-17 19:38 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-17 19:43 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-09-19 22:03 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-19 22:23 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-09-18 10:36 ` Mel Gorman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1189536502.32731.83.camel@localhost \
--to=mel@csn.ul.ie \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=eric.whitney@hp.com \
--cc=lee.schermerhorn@hp.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mtk-manpages@gmx.net \
--cc=solo@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).