From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (d01relay02.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.234]) by e5.ny.us.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l9PIlQKe007419 for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2007 14:47:26 -0400 Received: from d01av04.pok.ibm.com (d01av04.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.64]) by d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.5) with ESMTP id l9PIlQJH096044 for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2007 14:47:26 -0400 Received: from d01av04.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av04.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l9PIlP5e016030 for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2007 14:47:25 -0400 Subject: Re: RFC/POC Make Page Tables Relocatable From: Dave Hansen In-Reply-To: References: <1193330774.4039.136.camel@localhost> <1193335725.24087.19.camel@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 11:47:23 -0700 Message-Id: <1193338043.24087.24.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Ross Biro Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Mel Gorman List-ID: On Thu, 2007-10-25 at 14:44 -0400, Ross Biro wrote: > This is why I asked for some micro > benchmarks. I figured people would send the ones they feel are most > likely to fail. lmbench has some fault speed tests that are pretty sensitive to things like changes in the allocator. You might take a look at those. -- Dave -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org