From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Jaya Kumar <jayakumar.lkml@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
stefani@seibold.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
Subject: Re: vm_ops.page_mkwrite() fails with vmalloc on 2.6.23
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 23:16:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1193696211.5644.100.camel@lappy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1193681839.27652.60.camel@twins>
On Mon, 2007-10-29 at 19:17 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-10-29 at 13:51 -0400, Jaya Kumar wrote:
> > On 10/29/07, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2007-10-29 at 01:17 -0700, Jaya Kumar wrote:
> > > > An aside, I just tested that deferred IO works fine on 2.6.22.10/pxa255.
> > > >
> > > > I understood from the thread that PeterZ is looking into page_mkclean
> > > > changes which I guess went into 2.6.23. I'm also happy to help in any
> > > > way if the way we're doing fb_defio needs to change.
> > >
> > > OK, seems I can't read. Or at least, I missed a large part of the
> > > problem.
> > >
> > > page_mkclean() hasn't changed, it was ->page_mkwrite() that changed. And
> > > looking at the fb_defio code, I'm not sure I understand how its
> > > page_mkclean() use could ever have worked.
> > >
> > > The proposed patch [1] only fixes the issue of ->page_mkwrite() on
> > > vmalloc()'ed memory. Not page_mkclean(), and that has never worked from
> > > what I can make of it.
> > >
> > > Jaya, could you shed some light on this? I presume you had your display
> > > working.
> > >
> >
> > I thought I had it working. I saw the display update after each
> > mmap/write sequence to the framebuffer. I need to check if there's an
> > munmap or anything else going on in between write sequences that would
> > cause it to behave like page_mkclean was working.
> >
> > Is it correct to assume that page_mkclean should mark the pages
> > read-only so that the next write would again trigger mkwrite?
>
> Well, yes, that is the intended behaviour.
>
> > Even if the page was from a vmalloc_to_page()?
>
> That is the crux, I only ever implemented it for file pages.
Hmm, so these vmalloc pages are mapped into user-space with
remap_pfn_range(), which doesn't have any form of rmap. That is, given a
pfn there is no way to obtain all ptes for it. So the interface to
page_mkclean() could never work for these (as it only provides a struct
page *).
[ also, remap_vmalloc_range() suffers similar issues, only file and anon
have proper rmap ]
I'm not sure we want full rmap for remap_pfn/vmalloc_range, but perhaps
we could assist drivers in maintaining and using vma lists.
I think page_mkclean_one() would work if you'd manually set page->index
and iterate the vmas yourself. Although atm I'm not sure of anything so
don't pin me on it.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-29 22:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1193064057.16541.1.camel@matrix>
2007-10-29 7:40 ` vm_ops.page_mkwrite() fails with vmalloc on 2.6.23 Andrew Morton
2007-10-29 8:17 ` Jaya Kumar
2007-10-29 10:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-10-29 12:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-10-29 14:28 ` Nick Piggin
2007-10-29 17:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-10-29 17:51 ` Jaya Kumar
2007-10-29 18:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-10-29 22:16 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2007-10-30 1:22 ` Jaya Kumar
2007-10-30 9:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-10-30 10:49 ` Stefani Seibold
2007-10-30 12:39 ` Hugh Dickins
2007-10-30 13:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-10-30 13:16 ` Jaya Kumar
2007-10-30 13:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-10-30 15:47 ` Hugh Dickins
2007-10-30 15:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-11-01 8:02 ` Jaya Kumar
2007-10-22 14:45 Stefani Seibold
2007-10-22 16:37 ` Hugh Dickins
2007-10-22 17:03 ` Jaya Kumar
2007-10-22 17:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-10-22 17:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1193696211.5644.100.camel@lappy \
--to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=jayakumar.lkml@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=stefani@seibold.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).