linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
To: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	pagupta@redhat.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] mm/sparse: Optimize memmap allocation during sparse_init()
Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2018 21:36:16 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <11c4796f-865e-9e0c-076a-f750d5da0ea7@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180415021940.GA1750@localhost.localdomain>

On 04/14/2018 07:19 PM, Baoquan He wrote:
>>> Yes, this place is the hardest to understand. The temorary arrays are
>>> allocated beforehand with the size of 'nr_present_sections'. The error
>>> paths you mentioned is caused by allocation failure of mem_map or
>>> map_map, but whatever it's error or success paths, the sections must be
>>> marked as present in memory_present(). Error or success paths happened
>>> in alloc_usemap_and_memmap(), while checking if it's erorr or success
>>> paths happened in the last for_each_present_section_nr() of
>>> sparse_init(), and clear the ms->section_mem_map if it goes along error
>>> paths. This is the key point of this new allocation way.
>> I think you owe some commenting because this is so hard to understand.
> I can arrange and write a code comment above sparse_init() according to
> this patch's git log, do you think it's OK?
> 
> Honestly, it took me several days to write code, while I spent more
> than one week to write the patch log. Writing patch log is really a
> headache to me.

I often find the same: writing the code is the easy part.  Explaining
why it is right is the hard part.

  reply	other threads:[~2018-04-16  4:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-28  3:26 [PATCH v3 0/4] mm/sparse: Optimize memmap allocation during sparse_init() Baoquan He
2018-02-28  3:26 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] mm/sparse: Add a static variable nr_present_sections Baoquan He
2018-02-28  3:26 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] mm/sparsemem: Defer the ms->section_mem_map clearing Baoquan He
2018-04-06 14:23   ` Dave Hansen
2018-04-08  6:50     ` Baoquan He
2018-04-09 16:02       ` Dave Hansen
2018-04-10  0:26         ` Baoquan He
2018-02-28  3:26 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] mm/sparse: Add a new parameter 'data_unit_size' for alloc_usemap_and_memmap Baoquan He
2018-02-28  3:26 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] mm/sparse: Optimize memmap allocation during sparse_init() Baoquan He
2018-04-06 14:50   ` Dave Hansen
2018-04-08  8:20     ` Baoquan He
2018-04-09  2:07       ` Baoquan He
2018-04-11 15:48       ` Dave Hansen
2018-04-15  2:19         ` Baoquan He
2018-04-16  4:36           ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2018-04-05 22:08 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] " Andrew Morton
2018-04-06 11:05   ` Kirill A. Shutemov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=11c4796f-865e-9e0c-076a-f750d5da0ea7@intel.com \
    --to=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=pagupta@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).