From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/28] Swap over NFS -v16 From: Peter Zijlstra In-Reply-To: References: <20080220144610.548202000@chello.nl> <20080223000620.7fee8ff8.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <18371.43950.150842.429997@notabene.brown> <1204023042.6242.271.camel@lappy> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 16:41:57 +0100 Message-Id: <1204040517.6242.324.camel@lappy> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Miklos Szeredi Cc: neilb@suse.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no List-ID: On Tue, 2008-02-26 at 16:29 +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > > > mm-page_file_methods.patch > > > > > > This makes page_offset and others more expensive by adding a > > > conditional jump to a function call that is not usually made. > > > > > > Why do swap pages have a different index to everyone else? > > > > Because the page->index of an anonymous page is related to its (anon)vma > > so that it satisfies the constraints for vm_normal_page(). > > > > The index in the swap file it totally unrelated and quite random. Hence > > the swap-cache uses page->private to store it in. > > Yeah, and putting the condition into page_offset() will confuse code > which uses it for finding the offset in the VMA Right, do we do that anywhere? > or in a tmpfs file. Good point. I really should go read tmpfs some day, its really a blind spot for me. > So why not just have a separate page_swap_offset() function, used > exclusively by swap_in/out()? That would require duplicating quite a lot of NFS code from what I can see. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org