From: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [patch 21/21] cull non-reclaimable anon pages from the LRU at fault time
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 15:19:33 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1204229973.5301.34.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080228192929.793021800@redhat.com>
On Thu, 2008-02-28 at 14:29 -0500, Rik van Riel wrote:
corrections to description in case we decide to keep this patch.
> V2 -> V3:
> + rebase to 23-mm1 atop RvR's split lru series.
>
> V1 -> V2:
> + no changes
>
> Optional part of "noreclaim infrastructure"
>
> In the fault paths that install new anonymous pages, check whether
> the page is reclaimable or not using lru_cache_add_active_or_noreclaim().
> If the page is reclaimable, just add it to the active lru list [via
> the pagevec cache], else add it to the noreclaim list.
>
> This "proactive" culling in the fault path mimics the handling of
> mlocked pages in Nick Piggin's series to keep mlocked pages off
> the lru lists.
>
> Notes:
>
> 1) This patch is optional--e.g., if one is concerned about the
> additional test in the fault path. We can defer the moving of
> nonreclaimable pages until when vmscan [shrink_*_list()]
> encounters them. Vmscan will only need to handle such pages
> once.
>
> 2) I moved the call to page_add_new_anon_rmap() to before the test
> for page_reclaimable() and thus before the calls to
> lru_cache_add_{active|noreclaim}(), so that page_reclaimable()
> could recognize the page as anon,
<snip the bit about the vma arg. replaced with new note 3 below>
> TBD: I think this reordering is OK, but the previous order may
> have existed to close some obscure race?
>
<delete prev note 3, as it referred to patches that are no longer in the
series [altho' I continue to maintain them separately, "just in case"].
replace with this note about vma arg to page_reclaimable()>
3) The 'vma' argument to page_reclaimable() is require to notice that
we're faulting a page into an mlock()ed vma w/o having to scan the
page's rmap in the fault path. Culling mlock()ed anon pages is
currently the only reason for this patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com>
> Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
>
> Index: linux-2.6.25-rc2-mm1/mm/memory.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.25-rc2-mm1.orig/mm/memory.c 2008-02-28 00:27:06.000000000 -0500
> +++ linux-2.6.25-rc2-mm1/mm/memory.c 2008-02-28 12:49:23.000000000 -0500
> @@ -1678,7 +1678,7 @@ gotten:
> set_pte_at(mm, address, page_table, entry);
> update_mmu_cache(vma, address, entry);
> SetPageSwapBacked(new_page);
> - lru_cache_add_active_anon(new_page);
> + lru_cache_add_active_or_noreclaim(new_page, vma);
> page_add_new_anon_rmap(new_page, vma, address);
>
> /* Free the old page.. */
> @@ -2150,7 +2150,7 @@ static int do_anonymous_page(struct mm_s
> goto release;
> inc_mm_counter(mm, anon_rss);
> SetPageSwapBacked(page);
> - lru_cache_add_active_anon(page);
> + lru_cache_add_active_or_noreclaim(page, vma);
> page_add_new_anon_rmap(page, vma, address);
> set_pte_at(mm, address, page_table, entry);
>
> @@ -2292,10 +2292,10 @@ static int __do_fault(struct mm_struct *
> entry = maybe_mkwrite(pte_mkdirty(entry), vma);
> set_pte_at(mm, address, page_table, entry);
> if (anon) {
> - inc_mm_counter(mm, anon_rss);
> + inc_mm_counter(mm, anon_rss);
> SetPageSwapBacked(page);
> - lru_cache_add_active_anon(page);
> - page_add_new_anon_rmap(page, vma, address);
> + lru_cache_add_active_or_noreclaim(page, vma);
> + page_add_new_anon_rmap(page, vma, address);
> } else {
> inc_mm_counter(mm, file_rss);
> page_add_file_rmap(page);
> Index: linux-2.6.25-rc2-mm1/mm/swap_state.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.25-rc2-mm1.orig/mm/swap_state.c 2008-02-28 00:29:51.000000000 -0500
> +++ linux-2.6.25-rc2-mm1/mm/swap_state.c 2008-02-28 12:49:23.000000000 -0500
> @@ -300,7 +300,10 @@ struct page *read_swap_cache_async(swp_e
> /*
> * Initiate read into locked page and return.
> */
> - lru_cache_add_anon(new_page);
> + if (!page_reclaimable(new_page, vma))
> + lru_cache_add_noreclaim(new_page);
> + else
> + lru_cache_add_anon(new_page);
> swap_readpage(NULL, new_page);
> return new_page;
> }
>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-28 20:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-28 19:29 [patch 00/21] VM pageout scalability improvements Rik van Riel
2008-02-28 19:29 ` [patch 01/21] move isolate_lru_page() to vmscan.c Rik van Riel
2008-02-29 2:29 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-29 2:41 ` Rik van Riel
2008-02-29 2:47 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-28 19:29 ` [patch 02/21] Use an indexed array for LRU variables Rik van Riel
2008-02-29 16:03 ` Andy Whitcroft
2008-03-03 18:57 ` Rik van Riel
2008-02-28 19:29 ` [patch 03/21] use an array for the LRU pagevecs Rik van Riel
2008-02-29 15:40 ` Andy Whitcroft
2008-03-01 7:02 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-03-04 11:04 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-03-04 20:38 ` Rik van Riel
2008-03-05 1:38 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-28 19:29 ` [patch 04/21] free swap space on swap-in/activation Rik van Riel
2008-02-28 20:05 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-28 20:20 ` Rik van Riel
2008-02-28 19:29 ` [patch 05/21] define page_file_cache() function Rik van Riel
2008-02-29 11:53 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-28 19:29 ` [patch 06/21] split LRU lists into anon & file sets Rik van Riel
2008-03-01 12:13 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-03-01 12:46 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-28 19:29 ` [patch 07/21] SEQ replacement for anonymous pages Rik van Riel
2008-03-03 10:50 ` barrioskmc@gmail
2008-02-28 19:29 ` [patch 08/21] (NEW) add some sanity checks to get_scan_ratio Rik van Riel
2008-03-04 10:40 ` minchan Kim
2008-02-28 19:29 ` [patch 09/21] (NEW) improve reclaim balancing Rik van Riel
2008-03-01 13:35 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-03-03 19:26 ` Rik van Riel
2008-02-28 19:29 ` [patch 10/21] add newly swapped in pages to the inactive list Rik van Riel
2008-02-28 19:29 ` [patch 11/21] (NEW) more aggressively use lumpy reclaim Rik van Riel
2008-03-02 10:35 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-03-02 14:23 ` Rik van Riel
2008-02-28 19:29 ` [patch 12/21] No Reclaim LRU Infrastructure Rik van Riel
[not found] ` <44c63dc40802282058h67f7597bvb614575f06c62e2c@mail.gmail.com>
2008-02-29 14:48 ` Lee Schermerhorn
[not found] ` <44c63dc40803021904n5de681datba400e08079c152d@mail.gmail.com>
2008-03-03 3:06 ` minchan Kim
2008-03-03 18:46 ` Rik van Riel
2008-03-03 23:38 ` barrioskmc@gmail
2008-03-04 1:55 ` Rik van Riel
2008-03-04 10:46 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-03-04 15:05 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-03-04 21:21 ` Rik van Riel
2008-03-05 1:42 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-28 19:29 ` [patch 13/21] Non-reclaimable page statistics Rik van Riel
2008-02-28 19:29 ` [patch 14/21] scan noreclaim list for reclaimable pages Rik van Riel
2008-02-28 23:41 ` Randy Dunlap
2008-02-29 14:38 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-28 19:29 ` [patch 15/21] ramfs pages are non-reclaimable Rik van Riel
2008-02-28 19:29 ` [patch 16/21] SHM_LOCKED pages are nonreclaimable Rik van Riel
2008-02-28 19:29 ` [patch 17/21] non-reclaimable mlocked pages Rik van Riel
[not found] ` <44c63dc40802282055q508af6ccsb0e8ac3fb5e67d24@mail.gmail.com>
2008-02-29 14:47 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-28 19:29 ` [patch 18/21] mlock vma pages under mmap_sem held for read Rik van Riel
2008-02-28 19:29 ` [patch 19/21] handle mlocked pages during map/unmap and truncate Rik van Riel
2008-02-28 19:29 ` [patch 20/21] account mlocked pages Rik van Riel
2008-02-28 19:29 ` [patch 21/21] cull non-reclaimable anon pages from the LRU at fault time Rik van Riel
2008-02-28 20:19 ` Lee Schermerhorn [this message]
2008-02-28 22:27 ` Rik van Riel
2008-02-28 19:49 ` [patch 00/21] VM pageout scalability improvements Rik van Riel
2008-02-28 20:14 ` John Stoffel
2008-02-28 20:23 ` Rik van Riel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1204229973.5301.34.camel@localhost \
--to=lee.schermerhorn@hp.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).