From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmu notifiers #v8 From: Peter Zijlstra In-Reply-To: <20080303191540.GB11156@sgi.com> References: <20080221161028.GA14220@sgi.com> <20080227192610.GF28483@v2.random> <20080302155457.GK8091@v2.random> <20080303032934.GA3301@wotan.suse.de> <20080303125152.GS8091@v2.random> <20080303131017.GC13138@wotan.suse.de> <20080303151859.GA19374@sgi.com> <20080303165910.GA23998@wotan.suse.de> <20080303180605.GA3552@sgi.com> <20080303184517.GA4951@wotan.suse.de> <20080303191540.GB11156@sgi.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2008 11:35:32 +0100 Message-Id: <1204626932.6241.41.camel@lappy> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Jack Steiner Cc: Nick Piggin , Andrea Arcangeli , akpm@linux-foundation.org, Robin Holt , Avi Kivity , Izik Eidus , kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, general@lists.openfabrics.org, Steve Wise , Roland Dreier , Kanoj Sarcar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, daniel.blueman@quadrics.com, Christoph Lameter List-ID: On Mon, 2008-03-03 at 13:15 -0600, Jack Steiner wrote: > I haven't thought about locking requirements for the radix tree. Most accesses > would be read-only & updates infrequent. Any chance of an RCU-based radix > implementation? Otherwise, don't we add the potential for hot locks/cachelines > for threaded applications ??? The current radix tree implementation in the kernel is RCU capable. We just don't have many RCU users yet. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org