From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com" <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
xemul@openvz.org, "hugh@veritas.com" <hugh@veritas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] radix-tree page cgroup
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 22:11:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1205961066.6437.10.camel@lappy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080314191733.eff648f8.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
On Fri, 2008-03-14 at 19:17 +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> A lookup routine for page_cgroup struct.
>
> Now, page_cgroup is pointed by struct page's page_cgroup entry
>
> struct page {
> ...
> struct page_cgroup *page_cgroup;
> ..
> }
>
> But some people dislike this because this increases sizeof(struct page).
>
> For avoiding that, we'll have to add a lookup routine for
> pfn <-> page_cgroup.
> by radix-tree.
Good stuff.
> New function is
>
> struct page *get_page_cgroup(struct page *page, gfp_mask mask, bool allocate);
>
> if (allocate == true), look up and allocate new one if necessary.
> if (allocate == false), just do look up and return NULL if not exist.
I think others said as well, but we generally just write
if (allocate)
if (!allocate)
> Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
>
> init/Kconfig | 14 ++++
> mm/Makefile | 2
> mm/page_cgroup.c | 169 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 184 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Index: mm-2.6.25-rc5-mm1/mm/page_cgroup.c
> ===================================================================
> --- /dev/null
> +++ mm-2.6.25-rc5-mm1/mm/page_cgroup.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,173 @@
> +/*
> + * page_cgroup mamagement codes.
> + * page_cgroup is yet another mem_map when cgroup's memory resoruce controller
> + * is activated. It containes information which cannot be stored in usual
> + * mem_map. (it's too big.)
> + * This allows us to keep 'struct page' small when a user doesn't activate
> + * memory resource controller.
> + *
> + * Note: all things are allocated on demand.
> + *
> + * We can translate : struct page <-> pfn -> page_cgroup -> struct page.
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/mm.h>
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include <linux/radix-tree.h>
> +#include <linux/memcontrol.h>
> +#include <linux/page_cgroup.h>
> +#include <linux/err.h>
> +
> +
> +
> +#define PCGRP_SHIFT (CONFIG_CGROUP_PAGE_CGROUP_ORDER)
> +#define PCGRP_SIZE (1 << PCGRP_SHIFT)
> +
> +struct page_cgroup_head {
> + struct page_cgroup pc[PCGRP_SIZE];
> +};
> +
> +struct page_cgroup_root {
> + spinlock_t tree_lock;
> + struct radix_tree_root root_node;
> +};
> +
> +static struct page_cgroup_root *root_dir[MAX_NUMNODES];
> +
> +static void init_page_cgroup(struct page_cgroup_head *head, unsigned long pfn)
> +{
> + int i;
> + struct page_cgroup *pc;
> +
> + memset(head, 0, sizeof(*head));
> + for (i = 0; i < PCGRP_SIZE; ++i) {
> + pc = &head->pc[i];
> + pc->page = pfn_to_page(pfn + i);
> + spin_lock_init(&pc->lock);
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pc->lru);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +
> +struct kmem_cache *page_cgroup_cachep;
> +
> +static struct page_cgroup_head *
> +alloc_init_page_cgroup(unsigned long pfn, int nid, gfp_t mask)
> +{
> + struct page_cgroup_head *head;
> +
> + head = kmem_cache_alloc_node(page_cgroup_cachep, mask, nid);
> + if (!head)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + init_page_cgroup(head, pfn);
Just because I'm lazy, I'll suggest the shorter:
if (head)
init_page_cgroup(head, pfn)
> +
> + return head;
> +}
> +
> +void free_page_cgroup(struct page_cgroup_head *head)
> +{
> + kmem_cache_free(page_cgroup_cachep, head);
> +}
> +
> +
> +/*
> + * Look up page_cgroup struct for struct page (page's pfn)
> + * if (allocate == true), look up and allocate new one if necessary.
> + * if (allocate == false), look up and return NULL if it cannot be found.
> + */
> +
> +struct page_cgroup *
> +get_page_cgroup(struct page *page, gfp_t gfpmask, bool allocate)
> +{
> + struct page_cgroup_root *root;
> + struct page_cgroup_head *head;
> + struct page_cgroup *pc;
> + unsigned long pfn, idx;
> + int nid;
> + unsigned long base_pfn, flags;
> + int error;
Would a this make sense? :
might_sleep_if(allocate && (gfp_mask & __GFP_WAIT));
> + if (!page)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + pfn = page_to_pfn(page);
> + idx = pfn >> PCGRP_SHIFT;
> + nid = page_to_nid(page);
> +
> + root = root_dir[nid];
> + /* Before Init ? */
> + if (unlikely(!root))
> + return NULL;
> +
> + base_pfn = idx << PCGRP_SHIFT;
> +retry:
> + error = 0;
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + head = radix_tree_lookup(&root->root_node, idx);
> + rcu_read_unlock();
This looks iffy, who protects head here?
> + if (likely(head))
> + return &head->pc[pfn - base_pfn];
> + if (allocate == false)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + /* Very Slow Path. On demand allocation. */
> + gfpmask = gfpmask & ~(__GFP_HIGHMEM | __GFP_MOVABLE);
> +
> + head = alloc_init_page_cgroup(base_pfn, nid, gfpmask);
> + if (!head)
> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> + pc = NULL;
> + error = radix_tree_preload(gfpmask);
> + if (error)
> + goto out;
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&root->tree_lock, flags);
> + error = radix_tree_insert(&root->root_node, idx, head);
> +
> + if (!error)
> + pc = &head->pc[pfn - base_pfn];
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&root->tree_lock, flags);
> + radix_tree_preload_end();
> +out:
> + if (!pc) {
> + free_page_cgroup(head);
> + if (error == -EEXIST)
> + goto retry;
> + }
> + if (error)
> + pc = ERR_PTR(error);
> + return pc;
> +}
> +
> +__init int page_cgroup_init(void)
> +{
> + int nid;
> + struct page_cgroup_root *root;
> +
> + page_cgroup_cachep = kmem_cache_create("page_cgroup",
> + sizeof(struct page_cgroup_head), 0,
> + SLAB_PANIC | SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU, NULL);
> + if (!page_cgroup_cachep) {
> + printk(KERN_ERR "page accouning setup failure\n");
> + printk(KERN_ERR "can't initialize slab memory\n");
> + /* FIX ME: should return some error code ? */
> + return 0;
> + }
> + for_each_online_node(nid) {
> + if (node_state(nid, N_NORMAL_MEMORY)
> + root = kmalloc_node(sizeof(struct page_cgroup_root),
> + GFP_KERNEL, nid);
> + else
> + root = kmalloc(sizeof(struct page_cgroup_root),
> + GFP_KERNEL);
if (!node_state(nid, N_NORMAL_MEMORY))
nid = -1;
allows us to use a single kmalloc_node() statement.
> + INIT_RADIX_TREE(&root->root_node, GFP_ATOMIC);
> + spin_lock_init(&root->tree_lock);
> + smp_wmb();
unadorned barrier; we usually require a comment outlining the race, and
a reference to the matching barrier.
> + root_dir[nid] = root;
> + }
> +
> + printk(KERN_INFO "Page Accouintg is activated\n");
> + return 0;
> +}
> +late_initcall(page_cgroup_init);
> Index: mm-2.6.25-rc5-mm1/mm/Makefile
> ===================================================================
> --- mm-2.6.25-rc5-mm1.orig/mm/Makefile
> +++ mm-2.6.25-rc5-mm1/mm/Makefile
> @@ -32,5 +32,5 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_FS_XIP) += filemap_xip.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_MIGRATION) += migrate.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_SMP) += allocpercpu.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_QUICKLIST) += quicklist.o
> -obj-$(CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR) += memcontrol.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR) += memcontrol.o page_cgroup.o
>
> Index: mm-2.6.25-rc5-mm1/init/Kconfig
> ===================================================================
> --- mm-2.6.25-rc5-mm1.orig/init/Kconfig
> +++ mm-2.6.25-rc5-mm1/init/Kconfig
> @@ -405,6 +405,20 @@ config SYSFS_DEPRECATED_V2
> If you are using a distro with the most recent userspace
> packages, it should be safe to say N here.
>
> +config CGROUP_PAGE_CGROUP_ORDER
> + int "Order of page accounting subsystem"
> + range 0 10
> + default 3 if HIGHMEM64G
> + default 10 if 64BIT
> + default 7
> + depends on CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR
> + help
> + By making this value to be small, wastes in memory usage of page
> + accounting can be small. But big number is good for perfomance.
> + Especially, HIGHMEM64G users should keep this to be small because
> + you tend to have small kernel memory.
> + If unsure, use default.
> +
> config PROC_PID_CPUSET
> bool "Include legacy /proc/<pid>/cpuset file"
> depends on CPUSETS
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-19 21:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-14 9:59 [PATCH 0/7] memcg: radix-tree page_cgroup KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-03-14 10:03 ` [PATCH 1/7] re-define page_cgroup KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-03-16 14:15 ` Balbir Singh
2008-03-18 1:10 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-03-17 0:21 ` Li Zefan
2008-03-18 1:12 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-03-17 2:07 ` Li Zefan
2008-03-18 1:11 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-03-14 10:06 ` [PATCH 2/7] charge/uncharge KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-03-17 1:46 ` Balbir Singh
2008-03-18 1:14 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-03-17 2:26 ` Li Zefan
2008-03-18 1:15 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-03-14 10:07 ` [PATCH 3/7] memcg: move_lists KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-03-18 16:44 ` Balbir Singh
2008-03-19 2:34 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-03-14 10:15 ` [PATCH 4/7] memcg: page migration KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-03-17 2:36 ` Li Zefan
2008-03-18 1:17 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-03-18 18:11 ` Balbir Singh
2008-03-19 2:44 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-03-14 10:17 ` [PATCH 5/7] radix-tree page cgroup KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-03-17 2:56 ` Li Zefan
2008-03-17 3:26 ` Li Zefan
2008-03-18 1:18 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-03-18 1:23 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-03-19 2:05 ` Balbir Singh
2008-03-19 2:51 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-03-19 3:14 ` Balbir Singh
2008-03-19 3:24 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-03-19 21:11 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2008-03-20 4:45 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-03-20 5:09 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-03-14 10:18 ` [PATCH 6/7] memcg: speed up by percpu KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-03-17 3:03 ` Li Zefan
2008-03-18 1:25 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-03-18 23:55 ` Li Zefan
2008-03-19 2:51 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-03-19 21:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-03-19 21:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-03-20 9:08 ` Andy Whitcroft
2008-03-20 4:46 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-03-14 10:22 ` [PATCH 7/7] memcg: freeing page_cgroup at suitable chance KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-03-17 3:10 ` Li Zefan
2008-03-18 1:30 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-03-19 21:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-03-20 5:07 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-03-20 7:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-03-20 14:49 ` kamezawa.hiroyu
2008-03-20 16:04 ` kamezawa.hiroyu
2008-03-20 16:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-03-20 16:15 ` kamezawa.hiroyu
2008-03-15 6:15 ` [PATCH 0/7] memcg: radix-tree page_cgroup Balbir Singh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1205961066.6437.10.camel@lappy \
--to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=xemul@openvz.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).