From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.106]) by e31.co.us.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m3UL1J79007654 for ; Wed, 30 Apr 2008 17:01:19 -0400 Received: from d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (d03av04.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.170]) by d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.7) with ESMTP id m3UL19MW086870 for ; Wed, 30 Apr 2008 15:01:10 -0600 Received: from d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id m3UL16mr017449 for ; Wed, 30 Apr 2008 15:01:09 -0600 Subject: Re: [patch 12/18] hugetlbfs: support larger than MAX_ORDER From: Dave Hansen In-Reply-To: <20080423015430.965631000@nick.local0.net> References: <20080423015302.745723000@nick.local0.net> <20080423015430.965631000@nick.local0.net> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 14:01:03 -0700 Message-Id: <1209589263.4461.35.camel@nimitz.home.sr71.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: npiggin@suse.de Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, andi@firstfloor.org, kniht@linux.vnet.ibm.com, nacc@us.ibm.com, abh@cray.com, wli@holomorphy.com List-ID: On Wed, 2008-04-23 at 11:53 +1000, npiggin@suse.de wrote: > +static int __init alloc_bm_huge_page(struct hstate *h) I was just reading one of Jon's patches, and saw this. Could we expand the '_bm_' to '_boot_'? Or, maybe rename to bootmem_alloc_hpage()? 'bm' just doesn't seem to register in my teeny brain. -- Dave -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org