From: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nommu: Push kobjsize() slab-specific logic down to ksize().
Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 14:00:23 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1211310023.18026.210.camel@calx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0805201149270.10868@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
On Tue, 2008-05-20 at 11:51 -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Tue, 20 May 2008, Matt Mackall wrote:
>
> > > Hmm. That means we are sanctioning using ksize on arbitrary objects? SLUB
> > > supports that but SLAB wont and neither will SLOB. I think we need to stay
> > > with the strict definition that is needed by SLOB.
> >
> > Of course SLUB won't be able to tell you the size of objects allocated
> > statically, through bootmem, etc.
>
> Right the function actually give misleading results even if you just pass
> a pointer to an int at an address that is page backed but not using a slab
> allocator. Then PAGE_SIZE will be returned?
>
> So the semantics are screwed up here. kobjsize() should only be called for
> slab objects.
>
> Remove kobjsize completely and replace with calls to ksize? Callers must
> not call ksize() on non slab objects.
What'd you think of my idea of adding WARN_ONs to SLAB and SLUB for
these cases? That is, warn whenever ksize() gets a non-kmalloced
address?
--
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-20 19:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-20 9:59 [PATCH] nommu: Push kobjsize() slab-specific logic down to ksize() Paul Mundt
2008-05-20 15:18 ` David Howells
2008-05-20 16:52 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-05-20 18:23 ` Matt Mackall
2008-05-20 18:51 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-05-20 19:00 ` Matt Mackall [this message]
2008-05-20 19:08 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-05-20 19:14 ` Matt Mackall
2008-05-20 19:16 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-05-20 21:22 ` Matt Mackall
2008-05-21 1:19 ` Paul Mundt
2008-05-21 1:52 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-05-22 4:23 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-05-20 16:29 ` Matt Mackall
2008-05-21 2:43 ` Paul Mundt
2008-05-21 14:58 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-05-21 15:06 ` Matt Mackall
2008-05-21 17:13 ` Pekka J Enberg
2008-05-21 17:27 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-05-21 19:08 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-05-21 23:43 ` Paul Mundt
2008-05-22 0:01 ` Christoph Lameter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1211310023.18026.210.camel@calx \
--to=mpm@selenic.com \
--cc=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).