Re: [patch 1/6] mm: Allow architectures to define additional protection bits

Dave Kleikamp
2008-07-08T13:35:53Z

On Tue, 2008-07-08 at 16:18 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:

> Andrew, what tree should this go via ? I have further powerpc patches
> depending on this one... so on one hand I'd be happy to take it, but
> on the other hand, it's more likely to clash with other things...

Andrew has asked that it go through Paul, which now means you.

"It'd be simpler if Paul were to merge this. It doesn't conflict with
any pending work."
http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2008-July/058948.html

>
> Maybe I should check how it applies on top of linux-next.

Looks pretty clean:

patching file include/linux/mman.h
patching file mm/mmap.c
patching file mm/mprotect.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 237 (offset -2 lines).

Thanks,
Shaggy
--
David Kleikamp
IBM Linux Technology Center