From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail137.messagelabs.com (mail137.messagelabs.com [216.82.249.19]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 413AA6B0044 for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 04:07:27 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: [patch] SLQB slab allocator (try 2) From: Peter Zijlstra In-Reply-To: <1232959706.21504.7.camel@penberg-laptop> References: <20090123154653.GA14517@wotan.suse.de> <1232959706.21504.7.camel@penberg-laptop> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 10:07:20 +0100 Message-Id: <1232960840.4863.7.camel@laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Pekka Enberg Cc: Nick Piggin , Linux Memory Management List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Andrew Morton , Lin Ming , "Zhang, Yanmin" , Christoph Lameter List-ID: On Mon, 2009-01-26 at 10:48 +0200, Pekka Enberg wrote: > Christoph has expressed concerns over latency issues of SLQB, I suppose > it would be interesting to hear if it makes any difference to the > real-time folks. I'll 'soon' take a stab at converting SLQB for -rt. Currently -rt is SLAB only. Then again, anything that does allocation is per definition not bounded and not something we can have on latency critical paths -- so on that respect its not interesting. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org