From: "Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>, Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] SLQB slab allocator
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 15:29:05 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1233646145.2604.137.camel@ymzhang> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1233565214.17835.13.camel@penberg-laptop>
On Mon, 2009-02-02 at 11:00 +0200, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> Hi Yanmin,
>
> On Mon, 2009-02-02 at 11:38 +0800, Zhang, Yanmin wrote:
> > Can we add a checking about free memory page number/percentage in function
> > allocate_slab that we can bypass the first try of alloc_pages when memory
> > is hungry?
>
> If the check isn't too expensive, I don't any reason not to. How would
> you go about checking how much free pages there are, though? Is there
> something in the page allocator that we can use for this?
i>>?We can use nr_free_pages(), totalram_pages and hugetlb_total_pages(). Below
patch is a try. I tested it with hackbench and tbench on my stoakley
(2 qual-core processors) and tigerton (4 qual-core processors). There is almost no
regression.
Besides this patch, I have another patch to try to reduce the calculation
of "i>>?totalram_pages - hugetlb_total_pages()", but it touches many files. So just
post the first simple patch here for review.
Hugh,
Would you like to test it on your machines?
Thanks,
Yanmin
---
--- linux-2.6.29-rc2/mm/slub.c 2009-01-20 14:20:45.000000000 +0800
+++ linux-2.6.29-rc2_slubfreecheck/mm/slub.c 2009-02-03 14:40:52.000000000 +0800
@@ -23,6 +23,8 @@
#include <linux/debugobjects.h>
#include <linux/kallsyms.h>
#include <linux/memory.h>
+#include <linux/swap.h>
+#include <linux/hugetlb.h>
#include <linux/math64.h>
#include <linux/fault-inject.h>
@@ -1076,14 +1078,18 @@ static inline struct page *alloc_slab_pa
static struct page *allocate_slab(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags, int node)
{
- struct page *page;
+ struct page *page = NULL;
struct kmem_cache_order_objects oo = s->oo;
+ unsigned long free_pages = nr_free_pages();
+ unsigned long total_pages = totalram_pages - hugetlb_total_pages();
flags |= s->allocflags;
- page = alloc_slab_page(flags | __GFP_NOWARN | __GFP_NORETRY, node,
- oo);
- if (unlikely(!page)) {
+ if (free_pages > total_pages >> 3) {
+ page = alloc_slab_page(flags | __GFP_NOWARN | __GFP_NORETRY,
+ node, oo);
+ }
+ if (!page) {
oo = s->min;
/*
* Allocation may have failed due to fragmentation.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-03 7:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 99+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-21 14:30 [patch] SLQB slab allocator Nick Piggin
2009-01-21 14:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-21 15:17 ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-21 16:56 ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-21 17:40 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-23 3:31 ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-23 6:14 ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-23 12:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-21 17:59 ` Joe Perches
2009-01-23 3:35 ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-23 4:00 ` Joe Perches
2009-01-21 18:10 ` Hugh Dickins
2009-01-22 10:01 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-01-22 12:47 ` Hugh Dickins
2009-01-23 14:23 ` Hugh Dickins
2009-01-23 14:30 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-02-02 3:38 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2009-02-02 9:00 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-02-02 15:00 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-02-03 1:34 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2009-02-03 7:29 ` Zhang, Yanmin [this message]
2009-02-03 12:18 ` Hugh Dickins
2009-02-04 2:21 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2009-02-05 19:04 ` Hugh Dickins
2009-02-06 0:47 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2009-02-06 8:57 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-02-06 12:33 ` Hugh Dickins
2009-02-10 8:56 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2009-02-02 11:50 ` Hugh Dickins
2009-01-23 3:55 ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-23 13:57 ` Hugh Dickins
2009-01-22 8:45 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2009-01-23 3:57 ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-23 9:00 ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-23 13:34 ` Hugh Dickins
2009-01-23 13:44 ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-23 9:55 ` Andi Kleen
2009-01-23 10:13 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-01-23 11:25 ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-23 11:57 ` Andi Kleen
2009-01-23 13:18 ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-23 14:04 ` Andi Kleen
2009-01-23 14:27 ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-23 15:06 ` Andi Kleen
2009-01-23 15:15 ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-23 12:55 ` Nick Piggin
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-01-14 9:04 Nick Piggin
2009-01-14 10:53 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-01-14 11:47 ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-14 13:44 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-01-14 14:22 ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-14 14:45 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-01-14 15:09 ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-14 15:22 ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-14 15:30 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-01-14 15:59 ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-14 18:40 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-01-15 6:19 ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-15 20:47 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-01-16 3:43 ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-16 21:25 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-01-19 6:18 ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-22 0:13 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-01-22 9:27 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-01-22 9:30 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2009-01-22 9:33 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-01-23 15:32 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-01-23 15:37 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-01-23 15:42 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-01-23 15:32 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-01-23 4:09 ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-23 15:41 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-01-23 15:53 ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-26 17:28 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-02-03 1:53 ` Nick Piggin
2009-02-03 17:33 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-02-03 18:42 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-02-03 18:47 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-02-04 4:22 ` Nick Piggin
2009-02-04 20:09 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-02-05 3:18 ` Nick Piggin
2009-02-04 20:10 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-02-05 3:14 ` Nick Piggin
2009-02-04 4:07 ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-14 18:01 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-01-15 6:03 ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-15 20:05 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-01-16 3:19 ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-16 21:07 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-01-19 5:47 ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-22 0:19 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-01-23 4:17 ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-23 15:52 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-01-23 16:10 ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-23 17:09 ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-26 17:46 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-02-03 1:42 ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-26 17:34 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-02-03 1:48 ` Nick Piggin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1233646145.2604.137.camel@ymzhang \
--to=yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ming.m.lin@intel.com \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).