Re: [PATCH] Add tracepoints to track pagecache transition

Christoph Hellwig
2009-02-19T18:52:13Z

On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 10:24:46AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> On Tue, 17 Feb 2009, Atsushi Tsuji wrote:
> > >
> > > This is rather asymmetric, why don't we care about the offset for the
> > > removed page?
> > >
> >
> > Indeed.
> > I added the offset to the argument for the removed page and resend fixed patch.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Atsushi Tsuji <a-tsuji@bk.jp.nec.com>
>
> Could you package it up in one patch again and resend with [PATCH v2].
> Also make sure to Cc the memory folks, and ask for an Acked-by from them.

Well, until we actually get a consumer of those tracepoints, e.g. a
ftrace pluging into the tree strong NACK for me.

(p.s. I really don't get it why people keep trying to push dead code
into the tree)