Re: [RFC] Replace the watermark-related union in struct zone with a watermark[] array

[Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com>]

On Thu, 2009-04-30 at 14:35 +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> I think what you're saying that you'd be ok with
> 
> zone_wmark_min(z)
> zone_wmark_low(z)
> zone_wmark_high(z)
> 
> and z->pages_mark[WMARK_MIN] =
> and z->pages_mark[WMARK_LOW] =
> and z->pages_mark[WMARK_HIGH] =
> 
> ?
> 
> Is that a significant improvement over what the patch currently does? To
> me, it seems more verbose.

Either way, there are _relatively_ few users.  From a quick cscope, it
appears setup_per_zone_pages_min() is really the heaviest user assigning
them.

Personally, I do like having the 'wmark' or something similar in the
function or structure member names.  But, I also like having the units
in there as well.  There's probably not room for both, though.  I'm fine
with the naming you have above.  The only thing I might consider is
removing 'zone_' from the function names since it's implied from the
variable name:

	min_wmark_pages(z)

The 'z->pages_mark[WMARK_*]' form is ugly, but it should be basically
restricted to use in setup_per_zone_pages_min().  I think that means we
don't need set_foo() functions because of a lack of use sites.

-- Dave

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>