From: Stefani Seibold <stefani@seibold.net>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [patch] proc.txt: Update kernel filesystem/proc.txt documentation
Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2009 22:53:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1244580807.30614.10.camel@wall-e> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090609123641.f4733d8b.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Am Dienstag, den 09.06.2009, 12:36 -0700 schrieb Andrew Morton:
> On Tue, 09 Jun 2009 12:35:58 +0200
> Stefani Seibold <stefani@seibold.net> wrote:
>
> > This is a patch against the file Documentation/filesystem/proc.txt.
> >
> > It is an update for the "Process-Specific Subdirectories" to reflect
> > the changes till kernel 2.6.30. It also introduce the my
> > "provide stack information for threads".
>
> Sorry, but it would be much preferable to do this as two patches. The
> first fixes up proc.txt and the second adds the
> stack-information-for-threads material.
>
That is really frustrating. I did everything that you and ingo molnar
had complained.
What is wrong with the "provide stack information for threads"? It is a
very tiny patch which did not harm.
The only reason to fix and update the proc.txt was that you told me that
this is the last thing that you miss.
> This is because the two changes are quite conceptually distinct, and we
> might end up wanting to merge one chage and not the other.
>
Okay, if the other patch will not included than it makes no sense for me
to get in the other.
Simple question: will you accept the thread stack info patch or not? If
yes, i will spent the time to split proc.txt patch.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-09 20:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-31 14:58 Detailed Stack Information Patch [1/3] Stefani Seibold
2009-04-01 19:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-02 21:26 ` Stefani Seibold
2009-06-03 20:34 ` Detailed Stack Information Patch Next Generation Stefani Seibold
2009-06-03 21:06 ` Andrew Morton
2009-06-04 11:23 ` [patch] procfs: provide stack information for threads Stefani Seibold
2009-06-04 11:37 ` Andrew Morton
2009-06-04 11:56 ` Stefani Seibold
2009-06-04 17:57 ` Andrew Morton
2009-06-04 20:21 ` Stefani Seibold
2009-06-04 21:23 ` Andrew Morton
2009-06-05 19:12 ` Stefani Seibold
2009-06-05 19:19 ` Andrew Morton
2009-10-02 21:17 ` Andreas Schwab
2009-10-02 21:44 ` Andreas Schwab
2009-10-03 6:47 ` Andreas Schwab
2009-10-03 7:40 ` Stefani Seibold
2009-10-03 11:33 ` Stefani Seibold
2009-06-06 10:01 ` [patch] procfs: provide stack information for threads V0.6 Stefani Seibold
2009-06-09 10:35 ` [patch] proc.txt: Update kernel filesystem/proc.txt documentation Stefani Seibold
2009-06-09 19:36 ` Andrew Morton
2009-06-09 20:53 ` Stefani Seibold [this message]
2009-06-09 21:13 ` Andrew Morton
2009-06-10 6:46 ` [patch 1/2] " Stefani Seibold
2009-06-10 6:46 ` [patch 2/2] procfs: provide stack information for threads V0.7 Stefani Seibold
2009-06-10 7:20 ` [patch 2/2] procfs: provide stack information for threads V0.8 Stefani Seibold
2009-06-15 22:01 ` Andrew Morton
2009-06-16 7:14 ` Stefani Seibold
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1244580807.30614.10.camel@wall-e \
--to=stefani@seibold.net \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).