linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	npiggin@suse.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	cl@linux-foundation.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] slab,slub: ignore __GFP_WAIT if we're booting or suspending
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 21:11:00 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1244805060.7172.126.camel@pasglop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <84144f020906120311x7c7dd628s82e3ca9a840f9890@mail.gmail.com>


> OK, but that means we need to fix up every single caller. I'm fine
> with that but Ben is not. As I am unable to test powerpc here, I am
> inclined to just merge Ben's patch as "obviously correct".
> 
> That does not mean we can't introduce GFP_BOOT later on if we want to. Hmm?

Again, you are missing part of the picture. Yes we -can- fix all the
-direct- callers that are obviously only be run at boot time. But what
about all the indirect ones (or even direct ones) that can be called
either at boot time or later. vmalloc() is the perfect example (or more
precisely __get_vm_area() which brings in ioremap etc...) but there are
many more.

Cheers,
Ben.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-06-12 11:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-06-12  8:13 [PATCH 2/2] slab,slub: ignore __GFP_WAIT if we're booting or suspending Pekka J Enberg
2009-06-12  9:03 ` [PATCH v2] " Pekka J Enberg
2009-06-12  9:10   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-12  9:21     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-12  9:24       ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-12  9:36         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-12  9:45           ` Pekka J Enberg
2009-06-12  9:58             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-12 10:00               ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-12 15:22             ` Andrew Morton
2009-06-12  9:49     ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-12  9:52       ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-12  9:54         ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-12  9:59         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-25  4:38           ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-12 10:07       ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-12 10:11         ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-12 10:15           ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-12 10:30             ` Pekka J Enberg
2009-06-12 10:32               ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-12 15:16               ` Linus Torvalds
2009-06-12 15:16                 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-12 11:13             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-12 11:24               ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-12 11:11           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2009-06-12 11:34             ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-12 11:41               ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-12 11:43                 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-12 15:30               ` Andrew Morton
2009-06-12 21:42                 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-25  4:41                 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-12 11:09         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-12 15:04   ` Linus Torvalds
2009-06-12 15:05     ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-19 14:59   ` Pavel Machek
2009-06-19 22:27     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-19 23:23       ` Pavel Machek
2009-06-19 23:50         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-20  0:28           ` Pavel Machek
2009-06-20  2:10             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-21  6:18               ` Pavel Machek
2009-06-21  9:31                 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-25  4:34                   ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-25  9:56                     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1244805060.7172.126.camel@pasglop \
    --to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=npiggin@suse.de \
    --cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).