linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alok Kataria <akataria@vmware.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Hugepages should be accounted as unevictable pages.
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 17:08:34 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1245802114.24110.80.camel@alok-dev1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1245800490.31856.21.camel@nimitz>


On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 16:41 -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 15:23 -0700, Alok Kataria wrote:
> > > Could you just teach the thing to which you are hinting that it also
> > > needs to go look in sysfs for huge page counts?
> > 
> > :) yeah i could do that too...the point is that its a module and the
> > function to get the hugepages count is not exported right now. I could
> > very well add this as an exported symbol and use it from there, but
> > there can be someone who doesn't want symbols to be unnecessarily
> > exported if their is no in-tree modular usage of that symbol. 
> 
> Hmmm.  So what is the module doing?  The ol', "try to get as much memory
> as I possibly can" game? :)
> 
> It sounds like you can get access to the vm statistics from existing
> exported symbols, but the stats don't give you quite the info that you
> need.

>   So, you're trying to change things that you *can* get access to.

:) Not entirely, I thought that UNEVICTABLE by definition should
consider hugepages too. 

> 
> We do export all this stuff to userspace.  We export all of the huge
> page sizes and how many pages are reserved, used, and allocated in each,
> plus the contentious Unevictable.  Could you just do this calculation in
> userspace and pass it into the module with a modparam or sysfs file?

Hmm...lets see, I will look to moving that to userspace or something. 

But irrespective of my need, we must clear the confusion around what
unevictable should actually mean. 

I am biased towards getting hugepages accounted in that :), but what do
others think ? 

Lee, I will let you take a decision on that, if the current semantics
look okay, it would be great if you could update the unevictable_lru
documentation about this being just the number of pages on
unevictable_lru.

Thanks,
Alok
> 
> -- Dave
> 

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2009-06-24  0:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-06-22 21:25 [PATCH] Hugepages should be accounted as unevictable pages Alok Kataria
2009-06-23  3:25 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-06-23  4:46   ` Alok Kataria
2009-06-23  5:05     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-06-23  5:11       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-06-23  5:54         ` Alok Kataria
2009-06-23  6:06           ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-06-23 19:28             ` Alok Kataria
2009-06-23 20:30               ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-06-23 21:24           ` Rik van Riel
2009-06-23 21:42             ` Alok Kataria
2009-06-23 21:55               ` Rik van Riel
2009-06-23 22:06                 ` Alok Kataria
2009-06-23 22:19                   ` Dave Hansen
2009-06-23 22:55                   ` Rik van Riel
2009-06-23 23:28                     ` Alok Kataria
2009-06-23 23:48                       ` Dave Hansen
2009-06-23 22:15               ` Dave Hansen
2009-06-23 22:23                 ` Alok Kataria
2009-06-23 23:41                   ` Dave Hansen
2009-06-24  0:08                     ` Alok Kataria [this message]
2009-06-23 12:26       ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-06-29  9:58 ` Mel Gorman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1245802114.24110.80.camel@alok-dev1 \
    --to=akataria@vmware.com \
    --cc=Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com \
    --cc=dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).