From: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
To: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, sachinp@in.ibm.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] slqb: Do not use DEFINE_PER_CPU for per-node data
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 20:34:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1253302451-27740-2-git-send-email-mel@csn.ul.ie> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1253302451-27740-1-git-send-email-mel@csn.ul.ie>
SLQB used a seemingly nice hack to allocate per-node data for the statically
initialised caches. Unfortunately, due to some unknown per-cpu
optimisation, these regions are being reused by something else as the
per-node data is getting randomly scrambled. This patch fixes the
problem but it's not fully understood *why* it fixes the problem at the
moment.
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
---
mm/slqb.c | 16 ++++++++--------
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/slqb.c b/mm/slqb.c
index 4ca85e2..4d72be2 100644
--- a/mm/slqb.c
+++ b/mm/slqb.c
@@ -1944,16 +1944,16 @@ static void init_kmem_cache_node(struct kmem_cache *s,
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct kmem_cache_cpu, kmem_cache_cpus);
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
-/* XXX: really need a DEFINE_PER_NODE for per-node data, but this is better than
- * a static array */
-static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct kmem_cache_node, kmem_cache_nodes);
+/* XXX: really need a DEFINE_PER_NODE for per-node data because a static
+ * array is wasteful */
+static struct kmem_cache_node kmem_cache_nodes[MAX_NUMNODES];
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
static struct kmem_cache kmem_cpu_cache;
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct kmem_cache_cpu, kmem_cpu_cpus);
#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
-static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct kmem_cache_node, kmem_cpu_nodes); /* XXX per-nid */
+static struct kmem_cache_node kmem_cpu_nodes[MAX_NUMNODES]; /* XXX per-nid */
#endif
#endif
@@ -1962,7 +1962,7 @@ static struct kmem_cache kmem_node_cache;
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct kmem_cache_cpu, kmem_node_cpus);
#endif
-static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct kmem_cache_node, kmem_node_nodes); /*XXX per-nid */
+static struct kmem_cache_node kmem_node_nodes[MAX_NUMNODES]; /*XXX per-nid */
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
@@ -2918,15 +2918,15 @@ void __init kmem_cache_init(void)
for_each_node_state(i, N_NORMAL_MEMORY) {
struct kmem_cache_node *n;
- n = &per_cpu(kmem_cache_nodes, i);
+ n = &kmem_cache_nodes[i];
init_kmem_cache_node(&kmem_cache_cache, n);
kmem_cache_cache.node_slab[i] = n;
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
- n = &per_cpu(kmem_cpu_nodes, i);
+ n = &kmem_cpu_nodes[i];
init_kmem_cache_node(&kmem_cpu_cache, n);
kmem_cpu_cache.node_slab[i] = n;
#endif
- n = &per_cpu(kmem_node_nodes, i);
+ n = &kmem_node_nodes[i];
init_kmem_cache_node(&kmem_node_cache, n);
kmem_node_cache.node_slab[i] = n;
}
--
1.6.3.3
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-18 19:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-18 19:34 [RFC PATCH 0/3] Hatchet job for SLQB on memoryless configurations Mel Gorman
2009-09-18 19:34 ` Mel Gorman [this message]
2009-09-20 8:45 ` [PATCH 1/3] slqb: Do not use DEFINE_PER_CPU for per-node data Pekka Enberg
2009-09-20 10:00 ` Tejun Heo
2009-09-20 10:12 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-09-20 15:55 ` Tejun Heo
2009-09-21 6:24 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-09-21 8:46 ` Mel Gorman
2009-09-21 8:30 ` Sachin Sant
2009-09-21 8:42 ` Mel Gorman
2009-09-21 9:00 ` Tejun Heo
2009-09-21 9:44 ` Mel Gorman
2009-09-21 9:53 ` Tejun Heo
2009-09-21 10:04 ` Mel Gorman
2009-09-21 9:02 ` Sachin Sant
2009-09-21 9:09 ` Mel Gorman
2009-09-21 13:04 ` Mel Gorman
2009-09-21 13:31 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-09-21 13:45 ` Tejun Heo
2009-09-21 13:57 ` Mel Gorman
2009-09-21 23:54 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-09-20 14:04 ` Mel Gorman
2009-09-18 19:34 ` [PATCH 2/3] slqb: Treat pages freed on a memoryless node as local node Mel Gorman
2009-09-18 21:01 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-09-19 11:46 ` Mel Gorman
2009-09-21 17:34 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-09-22 13:33 ` Mel Gorman
2009-09-22 18:29 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-09-18 19:34 ` [PATCH 3/3] slqb: Allow SLQB to be used on PPC and S390 Mel Gorman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1253302451-27740-2-git-send-email-mel@csn.ul.ie \
--to=mel@csn.ul.ie \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=sachinp@in.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).