From: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@kvack.org,
Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>,
lwoodman@redhat.com, aarcange@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC -v2 PATCH -mm] change anon_vma linking to fix multi-process server scalability issue
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 00:29:35 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1264087775.1818.26.camel@barrios-desktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B57E442.5060700@redhat.com>
Hi, Rik.
Actually, I tested this patch a few days ago.
I met problem like you that hang with udev.
I will debug it when I have a time. :)
On Thu, 2010-01-21 at 00:21 -0500, Rik van Riel wrote:
> Today having 1000 client connections to a forking server is
> considered a lot, but I suspect it could be more common in a
> few years. I would like Linux to be ready for those kinds of
> workloads.
>
BTW, last year I suggested that removing anon_vma facility itself in
no swap machine(ie, embedded machine).
Although your patch add small cost, many of small memory machine don't
like it if they become to aware this patch.
So I want to make this patch configurable until we prove this patch is
no cost and afterwards we can remove configurable option.
Thanks for new trial to improve VM. :)
--
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-21 15:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-18 3:21 [RFC -v2 PATCH -mm] change anon_vma linking to fix multi-process server scalability issue Rik van Riel
2010-01-21 5:05 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-01-21 5:21 ` Rik van Riel
2010-01-21 15:29 ` Minchan Kim [this message]
2010-01-24 14:17 ` Minchan Kim
2010-01-22 6:57 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-01-22 16:25 ` Rik van Riel
2010-01-25 8:37 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-01-27 20:57 ` Rik van Riel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1264087775.1818.26.camel@barrios-desktop \
--to=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
--cc=Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lwoodman@redhat.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).