linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Subject: Re: vmalloc performance
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 13:58:49 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1271681929.7196.175.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1271603649.2100.122.camel@barrios-desktop>

Hi,

On Mon, 2010-04-19 at 00:14 +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-04-16 at 15:10 +0100, Steven Whitehouse wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On Fri, 2010-04-16 at 01:51 +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > [snip]
> > > Thanks for the explanation. It seems to be real issue. 
> > > 
> > > I tested to see effect with flush during rb tree search.
> > > 
> > > Before I applied your patch, the time is 50300661 us. 
> > > After your patch, 11569357 us. 
> > > After my debug patch, 6104875 us.
> > > 
> > > I tested it as changing threshold value.
> > > 
> > > threshold	time
> > > 1000		13892809
> > > 500		9062110
> > > 200		6714172
> > > 100		6104875
> > > 50		6758316
> > > 
> > My results show:
> > 
> > threshold        time
> > 100000           139309948
> > 1000             13555878
> > 500              10069801
> > 200              7813667
> > 100              18523172
> > 50               18546256
> > 
> > > And perf shows smp_call_function is very low percentage.
> > > 
> > > In my cases, 100 is best. 
> > > 
> > Looks like 200 for me.
> > 
> > I think you meant to use the non _minmax version of proc_dointvec too?
> 
> Yes. My fault :)
> 
> > Although it doesn't make any difference for this basic test.
> > 
> > The original reporter also has 8 cpu cores I've discovered. In his case
> > divided by 4 cpus where as mine are divided by 2 cpus, but I think that
> > makes no real difference in this case.
> > 
> > I'll try and get some further test results ready shortly. Many thanks
> > for all your efforts in tracking this down,
> > 
> > Steve.
> 
> I voted "free area cache".
My results with this patch are:

vmalloc took 5419238 us
vmalloc took 5432874 us
vmalloc took 5425568 us
vmalloc took 5423867 us

So thats about a third of the time it took with my original patch, so
very much going in the right direction :-)

I did get a compile warning:
  CC      mm/vmalloc.o
mm/vmalloc.c: In function a??__free_vmap_areaa??:
mm/vmalloc.c:454: warning: unused variable a??preva??

....harmless, but it should be fixed before the final version,

Steve.


--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2010-04-19 12:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-04-12 16:27 vmalloc performance Steven Whitehouse
2010-04-14 12:49 ` Steven Whitehouse
2010-04-14 14:24   ` Steven Whitehouse
2010-04-14 15:12     ` Minchan Kim
2010-04-14 15:13   ` Minchan Kim
2010-04-14 16:35     ` Minchan Kim
2010-04-15  8:33       ` Steven Whitehouse
2010-04-15 16:51         ` Minchan Kim
2010-04-16 14:10           ` Steven Whitehouse
2010-04-18 15:14             ` Minchan Kim
2010-04-19 12:58               ` Steven Whitehouse [this message]
2010-04-19 14:12                 ` Minchan Kim
2010-04-29 13:43                   ` Steven Whitehouse
2010-05-02 17:29                     ` [PATCH] cache last free vmap_area to avoid restarting beginning Minchan Kim
2010-05-05 12:48                       ` Steven Whitehouse
2010-05-05 16:16                         ` Nick Piggin
2010-05-17 12:42                           ` Steven Whitehouse
2010-05-18 13:44                             ` Steven Whitehouse
2010-05-19 13:54                           ` Steven Whitehouse
2010-05-19 13:56                             ` Nick Piggin
2010-05-25  8:43                             ` Nick Piggin
2010-05-25 15:00                               ` Minchan Kim
2010-05-25 15:48                                 ` Steven Whitehouse
2010-05-22  9:53                           ` Minchan Kim
2010-05-24  6:23                             ` Nick Piggin
2010-04-19 13:38               ` vmalloc performance Nick Piggin
2010-04-19 14:09                 ` Minchan Kim
2010-04-16  6:12         ` Nick Piggin
2010-04-16  7:20           ` Minchan Kim
2010-04-16  8:50           ` Steven Whitehouse

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1271681929.7196.175.camel@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=swhiteho@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
    --cc=npiggin@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).