Re: [RFC/T/D][PATCH 2/2] Linux/Guest cooperative unmapped page cache control

[Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com>]

On Thu, 2010-06-10 at 19:55 +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
> > I'm not sure victimizing unmapped cache pages is a good idea.
> > Shouldn't page selection use the LRU for recency information instead
> > of the cost of guest reclaim?  Dropping a frequently used unmapped
> > cache page can be more expensive than dropping an unused text page
> > that was loaded as part of some executable's initialization and
> > forgotten.
> 
> We victimize the unmapped cache only if it is unused (in LRU order).
> We don't force the issue too much. We also have free slab cache to go
> after.

Just to be clear, let's say we have a mapped page (say of /sbin/init)
that's been unreferenced since _just_ after the system booted.  We also
have an unmapped page cache page of a file often used at runtime, say
one from /etc/resolv.conf or /etc/passwd.

Which page will be preferred for eviction with this patch set?

-- Dave

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>