From: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
"M. Vefa Bicakci" <bicave@superonline.com>,
stable@kernel.org,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: [PATCH] vmscan: don't use return value trick when oom_killer_disabled
Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 00:47:41 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1283442461-16290-1-git-send-email-minchan.kim@gmail.com> (raw)
M. Vefa Bicakci reported 2.6.35 kernel hang up when hibernation on his
32bit 3GB mem machine. (https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16771)
Also he was bisected first bad commit is below
commit bb21c7ce18eff8e6e7877ca1d06c6db719376e3c
Author: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Fri Jun 4 14:15:05 2010 -0700
vmscan: fix do_try_to_free_pages() return value when priority==0 reclaim failure
At first impression, this seemed very strange because the above commit only
chenged function return value and hibernate_preallocate_memory() ignore
return value of shrink_all_memory(). But it's related.
Now, page allocation from hibernation code may enter infinite loop if
the system has highmem.
The reasons are two. 1) hibernate_preallocate_memory() call
alloc_pages() wrong order 2) vmscan don't care enough OOM case when
oom_killer_disabled.
This patch only fix (2). Why is oom_killer_disabled so special?
because when hibernation case, zone->all_unreclaimable never be turned on.
hibernation freeze all tasks at first, then kswapd can't works in this
case, and zone->all_unreclaimable is only turned from kswapd.
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: M. Vefa Bicakci <bicave@superonline.com>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
---
mm/vmscan.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
1 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index f620ab3..53b23a7 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -1893,12 +1893,11 @@ static void shrink_zone(int priority, struct zone *zone,
* If a zone is deemed to be full of pinned pages then just give it a light
* scan then give up on it.
*/
-static bool shrink_zones(int priority, struct zonelist *zonelist,
+static void shrink_zones(int priority, struct zonelist *zonelist,
struct scan_control *sc)
{
struct zoneref *z;
struct zone *zone;
- bool all_unreclaimable = true;
for_each_zone_zonelist_nodemask(zone, z, zonelist,
gfp_zone(sc->gfp_mask), sc->nodemask) {
@@ -1916,8 +1915,31 @@ static bool shrink_zones(int priority, struct zonelist *zonelist,
}
shrink_zone(priority, zone, sc);
- all_unreclaimable = false;
}
+}
+
+static inline bool all_unreclaimable(struct zonelist *zonelist,
+ struct scan_control *sc)
+{
+ struct zoneref *z;
+ struct zone *zone;
+ bool all_unreclaimable = true;
+
+ if (!scanning_global_lru(sc))
+ return false;
+
+ for_each_zone_zonelist_nodemask(zone, z, zonelist,
+ gfp_zone(sc->gfp_mask), sc->nodemask) {
+ if (!populated_zone(zone))
+ continue;
+ if (!cpuset_zone_allowed_hardwall(zone, GFP_KERNEL))
+ continue;
+ if (zone->pages_scanned < (zone_reclaimable_pages(zone) * 6)) {
+ all_unreclaimable = false;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+
return all_unreclaimable;
}
@@ -1941,7 +1963,6 @@ static unsigned long do_try_to_free_pages(struct zonelist *zonelist,
struct scan_control *sc)
{
int priority;
- bool all_unreclaimable;
unsigned long total_scanned = 0;
struct reclaim_state *reclaim_state = current->reclaim_state;
struct zoneref *z;
@@ -1958,7 +1979,7 @@ static unsigned long do_try_to_free_pages(struct zonelist *zonelist,
sc->nr_scanned = 0;
if (!priority)
disable_swap_token();
- all_unreclaimable = shrink_zones(priority, zonelist, sc);
+ shrink_zones(priority, zonelist, sc);
/*
* Don't shrink slabs when reclaiming memory from
* over limit cgroups
@@ -2020,7 +2041,7 @@ out:
return sc->nr_reclaimed;
/* top priority shrink_zones still had more to do? don't OOM, then */
- if (scanning_global_lru(sc) && !all_unreclaimable)
+ if (!all_unreclaimable(zonelist, sc))
return 1;
return 0;
--
1.7.0.5
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next reply other threads:[~2010-09-02 15:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-02 15:47 Minchan Kim [this message]
2010-09-02 20:04 ` [PATCH] vmscan: don't use return value trick when oom_killer_disabled Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-09-03 4:28 ` Minchan Kim
2010-09-03 6:33 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1283442461-16290-1-git-send-email-minchan.kim@gmail.com \
--to=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bicave@superonline.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).