From: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
containers@lists.osdl.org, Andrea Righi <arighi@develer.com>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>,
Ciju Rajan K <ciju@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 10/11] memcg: add cgroupfs interface to memcg dirty limits
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 00:09:13 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1288336154-23256-11-git-send-email-gthelen@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1288336154-23256-1-git-send-email-gthelen@google.com>
Add cgroupfs interface to memcg dirty page limits:
Direct write-out is controlled with:
- memory.dirty_ratio
- memory.dirty_limit_in_bytes
Background write-out is controlled with:
- memory.dirty_background_ratio
- memory.dirty_background_limit_bytes
Other memcg cgroupfs files support 'M', 'm', 'k', 'K', 'g'
and 'G' suffixes for byte counts. This patch provides the
same functionality for memory.dirty_limit_in_bytes and
memory.dirty_background_limit_bytes.
Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <arighi@develer.com>
Signed-off-by: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>
---
Changelog since v3:
- Make use of new routine, __mem_cgroup_has_dirty_limit(), to disable memcg
dirty limits when use_hierarchy=1.
Changelog since v1:
- Renamed newly created proc files:
- memory.dirty_bytes -> memory.dirty_limit_in_bytes
- memory.dirty_background_bytes -> memory.dirty_background_limit_in_bytes
- Allow [kKmMgG] suffixes for newly created dirty limit value cgroupfs files.
mm/memcontrol.c | 114 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 files changed, 114 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 35dc329..52141c5 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -100,6 +100,13 @@ enum mem_cgroup_stat_index {
MEM_CGROUP_STAT_NSTATS,
};
+enum {
+ MEM_CGROUP_DIRTY_RATIO,
+ MEM_CGROUP_DIRTY_LIMIT_IN_BYTES,
+ MEM_CGROUP_DIRTY_BACKGROUND_RATIO,
+ MEM_CGROUP_DIRTY_BACKGROUND_LIMIT_IN_BYTES,
+};
+
struct mem_cgroup_stat_cpu {
s64 count[MEM_CGROUP_STAT_NSTATS];
};
@@ -4356,6 +4363,89 @@ static int mem_cgroup_oom_control_write(struct cgroup *cgrp,
return 0;
}
+static u64 mem_cgroup_dirty_read(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct cftype *cft)
+{
+ struct mem_cgroup *mem = mem_cgroup_from_cont(cgrp);
+ bool use_sys = !__mem_cgroup_has_dirty_limit(mem);
+
+ switch (cft->private) {
+ case MEM_CGROUP_DIRTY_RATIO:
+ return use_sys ? vm_dirty_ratio : mem->dirty_param.dirty_ratio;
+ case MEM_CGROUP_DIRTY_LIMIT_IN_BYTES:
+ return use_sys ? vm_dirty_bytes : mem->dirty_param.dirty_bytes;
+ case MEM_CGROUP_DIRTY_BACKGROUND_RATIO:
+ return use_sys ? dirty_background_ratio :
+ mem->dirty_param.dirty_background_ratio;
+ case MEM_CGROUP_DIRTY_BACKGROUND_LIMIT_IN_BYTES:
+ return use_sys ? dirty_background_bytes :
+ mem->dirty_param.dirty_background_bytes;
+ default:
+ BUG();
+ }
+}
+
+static int
+mem_cgroup_dirty_write_string(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct cftype *cft,
+ const char *buffer)
+{
+ struct mem_cgroup *memcg = mem_cgroup_from_cont(cgrp);
+ int type = cft->private;
+ int ret = -EINVAL;
+ unsigned long long val;
+
+ if (!__mem_cgroup_has_dirty_limit(memcg))
+ return ret;
+
+ switch (type) {
+ case MEM_CGROUP_DIRTY_LIMIT_IN_BYTES:
+ /* This function does all necessary parse...reuse it */
+ ret = res_counter_memparse_write_strategy(buffer, &val);
+ if (ret)
+ break;
+ memcg->dirty_param.dirty_bytes = val;
+ memcg->dirty_param.dirty_ratio = 0;
+ break;
+ case MEM_CGROUP_DIRTY_BACKGROUND_LIMIT_IN_BYTES:
+ ret = res_counter_memparse_write_strategy(buffer, &val);
+ if (ret)
+ break;
+ memcg->dirty_param.dirty_background_bytes = val;
+ memcg->dirty_param.dirty_background_ratio = 0;
+ break;
+ default:
+ BUG();
+ break;
+ }
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static int
+mem_cgroup_dirty_write(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct cftype *cft, u64 val)
+{
+ struct mem_cgroup *memcg = mem_cgroup_from_cont(cgrp);
+ int type = cft->private;
+
+ if (!__mem_cgroup_has_dirty_limit(memcg))
+ return -EINVAL;
+ if ((type == MEM_CGROUP_DIRTY_RATIO ||
+ type == MEM_CGROUP_DIRTY_BACKGROUND_RATIO) && val > 100)
+ return -EINVAL;
+ switch (type) {
+ case MEM_CGROUP_DIRTY_RATIO:
+ memcg->dirty_param.dirty_ratio = val;
+ memcg->dirty_param.dirty_bytes = 0;
+ break;
+ case MEM_CGROUP_DIRTY_BACKGROUND_RATIO:
+ memcg->dirty_param.dirty_background_ratio = val;
+ memcg->dirty_param.dirty_background_bytes = 0;
+ break;
+ default:
+ BUG();
+ break;
+ }
+ return 0;
+}
+
static struct cftype mem_cgroup_files[] = {
{
.name = "usage_in_bytes",
@@ -4419,6 +4509,30 @@ static struct cftype mem_cgroup_files[] = {
.unregister_event = mem_cgroup_oom_unregister_event,
.private = MEMFILE_PRIVATE(_OOM_TYPE, OOM_CONTROL),
},
+ {
+ .name = "dirty_ratio",
+ .read_u64 = mem_cgroup_dirty_read,
+ .write_u64 = mem_cgroup_dirty_write,
+ .private = MEM_CGROUP_DIRTY_RATIO,
+ },
+ {
+ .name = "dirty_limit_in_bytes",
+ .read_u64 = mem_cgroup_dirty_read,
+ .write_string = mem_cgroup_dirty_write_string,
+ .private = MEM_CGROUP_DIRTY_LIMIT_IN_BYTES,
+ },
+ {
+ .name = "dirty_background_ratio",
+ .read_u64 = mem_cgroup_dirty_read,
+ .write_u64 = mem_cgroup_dirty_write,
+ .private = MEM_CGROUP_DIRTY_BACKGROUND_RATIO,
+ },
+ {
+ .name = "dirty_background_limit_in_bytes",
+ .read_u64 = mem_cgroup_dirty_read,
+ .write_string = mem_cgroup_dirty_write_string,
+ .private = MEM_CGROUP_DIRTY_BACKGROUND_LIMIT_IN_BYTES,
+ },
};
#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR_SWAP
--
1.7.3.1
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-29 7:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-29 7:09 [PATCH v4 00/11] memcg: per cgroup dirty page accounting Greg Thelen
2010-10-29 7:09 ` [PATCH v4 01/11] memcg: add page_cgroup flags for dirty page tracking Greg Thelen
2010-10-29 7:09 ` [PATCH v4 02/11] memcg: document cgroup dirty memory interfaces Greg Thelen
2010-10-29 11:03 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-10-29 21:35 ` Greg Thelen
2010-10-30 3:02 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-10-29 20:19 ` Andrew Morton
2010-10-29 21:37 ` Greg Thelen
2010-10-29 7:09 ` [PATCH v4 03/11] memcg: create extensible page stat update routines Greg Thelen
2010-10-31 14:48 ` Ciju Rajan K
2010-10-31 20:11 ` Greg Thelen
2010-11-01 20:16 ` Ciju Rajan K
2010-11-02 19:35 ` Ciju Rajan K
2010-10-29 7:09 ` [PATCH v4 04/11] memcg: add lock to synchronize page accounting and migration Greg Thelen
2010-10-29 7:09 ` [PATCH v4 05/11] writeback: create dirty_info structure Greg Thelen
2010-10-29 7:50 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-11-18 0:49 ` Andrew Morton
2010-11-18 0:50 ` Andrew Morton
2010-11-18 2:02 ` Greg Thelen
2010-10-29 7:09 ` [PATCH v4 06/11] memcg: add dirty page accounting infrastructure Greg Thelen
2010-10-29 11:13 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-10-29 11:17 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-10-29 7:09 ` [PATCH v4 07/11] memcg: add kernel calls for memcg dirty page stats Greg Thelen
2010-10-29 7:09 ` [PATCH v4 08/11] memcg: add dirty limits to mem_cgroup Greg Thelen
2010-10-29 7:41 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-10-29 16:00 ` Greg Thelen
2010-10-29 7:09 ` [PATCH v4 09/11] memcg: CPU hotplug lockdep warning fix Greg Thelen
2010-10-29 20:19 ` Andrew Morton
2010-10-29 7:09 ` Greg Thelen [this message]
2010-10-29 7:43 ` [PATCH v4 10/11] memcg: add cgroupfs interface to memcg dirty limits KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-10-29 7:09 ` [PATCH v4 11/11] memcg: check memcg dirty limits in page writeback Greg Thelen
2010-10-29 7:48 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-10-29 16:06 ` Greg Thelen
2010-10-31 20:03 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-10-29 20:19 ` [PATCH v4 00/11] memcg: per cgroup dirty page accounting Andrew Morton
2010-10-30 21:46 ` Greg Thelen
2010-11-02 19:33 ` Ciju Rajan K
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1288336154-23256-11-git-send-email-gthelen@google.com \
--to=gthelen@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arighi@develer.com \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=ciju@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=containers@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
--cc=nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).