From: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
To: linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2]mm: batch activate_page() to reduce lock contention
Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2011 16:00:09 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1294214409.1949.573.camel@sli10-conroe> (raw)
The zone->lru_lock is heavily contented in workload where activate_page()
is frequently used. We could do batch activate_page() to reduce the lock
contention. The batched pages will be added into zone list when the pool
is full or page reclaim is trying to drain them.
For example, in a 4 socket 64 CPU system, create a sparse file and 64 processes,
processes shared map to the file. Each process read access the whole file and
then exit. The process exit will do unmap_vmas() and cause a lot of
activate_page() call. In such workload, we saw about 58% total time reduction
with below patch. Other workloads with a lot of activate_page also benefits a
lot too.
V1->v2:
1. reduced footprint in UP case as requested by akpm. Currently the patched
kernel binary adds 34 bytes in UP case.
2. When putback_lru_pages activates a page, it follows the same path like
activate_page. This is suggested by akpm.
Initial post is at:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=127961033307852&w=2
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
---
mm/internal.h | 9 +++++
mm/swap.c | 91 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
mm/vmscan.c | 6 ++-
3 files changed, 93 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
Index: linux/mm/swap.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/mm/swap.c 2011-01-04 13:56:12.000000000 +0800
+++ linux/mm/swap.c 2011-01-04 13:57:07.000000000 +0800
@@ -191,27 +191,94 @@ static void update_page_reclaim_stat(str
}
/*
- * FIXME: speed this up?
+ * A page will go to active list either by activate_page or putback_lru_page.
+ * In the activate_page case, the page hasn't active bit set. The page might
+ * not in LRU list because it's isolated before it gets a chance to be moved to
+ * active list. The window is small because pagevec just stores several pages.
+ * For such case, we do nothing for such page.
+ * In the putback_lru_page case, the page isn't in lru list but has active
+ * bit set
*/
-void activate_page(struct page *page)
+static void __activate_page(struct page *page, void *arg)
{
struct zone *zone = page_zone(page);
+ int file = page_is_file_cache(page);
+ int lru = page_lru_base_type(page);
+ bool putback = !PageLRU(page);
+
+ /* The page is isolated before it's moved to active list */
+ if (!PageLRU(page) && !PageActive(page))
+ return;
+ if ((PageLRU(page) && PageActive(page)) || PageUnevictable(page))
+ return;
- spin_lock_irq(&zone->lru_lock);
- if (PageLRU(page) && !PageActive(page) && !PageUnevictable(page)) {
- int file = page_is_file_cache(page);
- int lru = page_lru_base_type(page);
+ if (!putback)
del_page_from_lru_list(zone, page, lru);
+ else
+ SetPageLRU(page);
+
+ SetPageActive(page);
+ lru += LRU_ACTIVE;
+ add_page_to_lru_list(zone, page, lru);
+
+ if (putback)
+ return;
+ __count_vm_event(PGACTIVATE);
+ update_page_reclaim_stat(zone, page, file, 1);
+}
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct pagevec, activate_page_pvecs);
+
+static void activate_page_drain(int cpu)
+{
+ struct pagevec *pvec = &per_cpu(activate_page_pvecs, cpu);
+
+ if (pagevec_count(pvec))
+ pagevec_lru_move_fn(pvec, __activate_page, NULL);
+}
+
+void activate_page(struct page *page)
+{
+ if (PageLRU(page) && !PageActive(page) && !PageUnevictable(page)) {
+ struct pagevec *pvec = &get_cpu_var(activate_page_pvecs);
- SetPageActive(page);
- lru += LRU_ACTIVE;
- add_page_to_lru_list(zone, page, lru);
- __count_vm_event(PGACTIVATE);
+ page_cache_get(page);
+ if (!pagevec_add(pvec, page))
+ pagevec_lru_move_fn(pvec, __activate_page, NULL);
+ put_cpu_var(activate_page_pvecs);
+ }
+}
+
+/* Caller should hold zone->lru_lock */
+int putback_active_lru_page(struct zone *zone, struct page *page)
+{
+ struct pagevec *pvec = &get_cpu_var(activate_page_pvecs);
- update_page_reclaim_stat(zone, page, file, 1);
+ if (!pagevec_add(pvec, page)) {
+ spin_unlock_irq(&zone->lru_lock);
+ pagevec_lru_move_fn(pvec, __activate_page, NULL);
+ spin_lock_irq(&zone->lru_lock);
}
+ put_cpu_var(activate_page_pvecs);
+ return 1;
+}
+
+#else
+static void inline activate_page_drain(int cpu)
+{
+}
+
+void activate_page(struct page *page)
+{
+ struct zone *zone = page_zone(page);
+
+ spin_lock_irq(&zone->lru_lock);
+ if (PageLRU(page) && !PageActive(page) && !PageUnevictable(page))
+ __activate_page(page, NULL);
spin_unlock_irq(&zone->lru_lock);
}
+#endif
/*
* Mark a page as having seen activity.
@@ -310,6 +377,8 @@ static void drain_cpu_pagevecs(int cpu)
pagevec_move_tail(pvec);
local_irq_restore(flags);
}
+
+ activate_page_drain(cpu);
}
void lru_add_drain(void)
Index: linux/mm/vmscan.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/mm/vmscan.c 2011-01-04 11:06:33.000000000 +0800
+++ linux/mm/vmscan.c 2011-01-04 13:57:07.000000000 +0800
@@ -1253,13 +1253,15 @@ putback_lru_pages(struct zone *zone, str
spin_lock_irq(&zone->lru_lock);
continue;
}
- SetPageLRU(page);
lru = page_lru(page);
- add_page_to_lru_list(zone, page, lru);
if (is_active_lru(lru)) {
int file = is_file_lru(lru);
reclaim_stat->recent_rotated[file]++;
+ if (putback_active_lru_page(zone, page))
+ continue;
}
+ SetPageLRU(page);
+ add_page_to_lru_list(zone, page, lru);
if (!pagevec_add(&pvec, page)) {
spin_unlock_irq(&zone->lru_lock);
__pagevec_release(&pvec);
Index: linux/mm/internal.h
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/mm/internal.h 2011-01-04 11:06:33.000000000 +0800
+++ linux/mm/internal.h 2011-01-04 13:57:07.000000000 +0800
@@ -39,6 +39,15 @@ static inline void __put_page(struct pag
extern unsigned long highest_memmap_pfn;
+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+extern int putback_active_lru_page(struct zone *zone, struct page *page);
+#else
+static inline int putback_active_lru_page(struct zone *zone, struct page *page)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+#endif
+
/*
* in mm/vmscan.c:
*/
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom policy in Canada: sign http://dissolvethecrtc.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next reply other threads:[~2011-01-05 8:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-05 8:00 Shaohua Li [this message]
2011-01-05 22:10 ` [PATCH v2 2/2]mm: batch activate_page() to reduce lock contention Andrew Morton
2011-01-07 8:33 ` Shaohua Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1294214409.1949.573.camel@sli10-conroe \
--to=shaohua.li@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).