From: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, mel <mel@csn.ul.ie>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 v4]mm: simplify code of swap.c
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 09:45:21 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1300153521.2337.65.camel@sli10-conroe> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110314143457.GA11699@barrios-desktop>
On Mon, 2011-03-14 at 22:34 +0800, Minchan Kim wrote:
> Sorry for the late review.
>
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 01:30:18PM +0800, Shaohua Li wrote:
> > Clean up code and remove duplicate code. Next patch will use
> > pagevec_lru_move_fn introduced here too.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
>
> There is a just nitpick below but I don't care about it if you don't mind it.
> It's up to you or Andrew.
>
> >
> > ---
> > mm/swap.c | 133 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------------------
> > 1 file changed, 58 insertions(+), 75 deletions(-)
> >
> > Index: linux/mm/swap.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux.orig/mm/swap.c 2011-03-09 12:47:09.000000000 +0800
> > +++ linux/mm/swap.c 2011-03-09 13:39:26.000000000 +0800
> > @@ -179,15 +179,13 @@ void put_pages_list(struct list_head *pa
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL(put_pages_list);
> >
> > -/*
> > - * pagevec_move_tail() must be called with IRQ disabled.
> > - * Otherwise this may cause nasty races.
> > - */
> > -static void pagevec_move_tail(struct pagevec *pvec)
> > +static void pagevec_lru_move_fn(struct pagevec *pvec,
> > + void (*move_fn)(struct page *page, void *arg),
> > + void *arg)
> > {
> > int i;
> > - int pgmoved = 0;
> > struct zone *zone = NULL;
> > + unsigned long flags = 0;
> >
> > for (i = 0; i < pagevec_count(pvec); i++) {
> > struct page *page = pvec->pages[i];
> > @@ -195,30 +193,50 @@ static void pagevec_move_tail(struct pag
> >
> > if (pagezone != zone) {
> > if (zone)
> > - spin_unlock(&zone->lru_lock);
> > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&zone->lru_lock, flags);
> > zone = pagezone;
> > - spin_lock(&zone->lru_lock);
> > - }
> > - if (PageLRU(page) && !PageActive(page) && !PageUnevictable(page)) {
> > - enum lru_list lru = page_lru_base_type(page);
> > - list_move_tail(&page->lru, &zone->lru[lru].list);
> > - mem_cgroup_rotate_reclaimable_page(page);
> > - pgmoved++;
> > + spin_lock_irqsave(&zone->lru_lock, flags);
> > }
> > +
> > + (*move_fn)(page, arg);
> > }
> > if (zone)
> > - spin_unlock(&zone->lru_lock);
> > - __count_vm_events(PGROTATED, pgmoved);
> > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&zone->lru_lock, flags);
> > release_pages(pvec->pages, pvec->nr, pvec->cold);
> > pagevec_reinit(pvec);
> > }
> >
> > +static void pagevec_move_tail_fn(struct page *page, void *arg)
> > +{
> > + int *pgmoved = arg;
> > + struct zone *zone = page_zone(page);
> > +
> > + if (PageLRU(page) && !PageActive(page) && !PageUnevictable(page)) {
> > + enum lru_list lru = page_lru_base_type(page);
> > + list_move_tail(&page->lru, &zone->lru[lru].list);
> > + mem_cgroup_rotate_reclaimable_page(page);
> > + (*pgmoved)++;
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * pagevec_move_tail() must be called with IRQ disabled.
> > + * Otherwise this may cause nasty races.
> > + */
> > +static void pagevec_move_tail(struct pagevec *pvec)
> > +{
> > + int pgmoved = 0;
> > +
> > + pagevec_lru_move_fn(pvec, pagevec_move_tail_fn, &pgmoved);
> > + __count_vm_events(PGROTATED, pgmoved);
> > +}
> > +
>
> Do we really need 3rd argument of pagevec_lru_move_fn?
> It seems to be used just only pagevec_move_tail_fn.
> But let's think about it again.
> The __count_vm_events(pgmoved) could be done in pagevec_move_tail_fn.
>
> I don't like unnecessary argument passing although it's not a big overhead.
> I want to make the code simple if we don't have any reason.
Sure, making code simple is always preferred.
___pagevec_lru_add_fn uses the third the parameter too.
Thanks,
Shaohua
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-15 1:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-10 5:30 [PATCH 1/2 v4]mm: simplify code of swap.c Shaohua Li
2011-03-14 14:34 ` Minchan Kim
2011-03-14 14:39 ` Minchan Kim
2011-03-15 1:45 ` Shaohua Li [this message]
2011-03-15 2:03 ` Minchan Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1300153521.2337.65.camel@sli10-conroe \
--to=shaohua.li@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
--cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).