linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
To: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: sysfs interface to transparent hugepages
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 03:00:31 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1300676431.26693.317.camel@localhost> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1374 bytes --]

This kind of cute format:

       if (test_bit(enabled, &transparent_hugepage_flags)) {
               VM_BUG_ON(test_bit(req_madv, &transparent_hugepage_flags));
               return sprintf(buf, "[always] madvise never\n");
       } else if (test_bit(req_madv, &transparent_hugepage_flags))
               return sprintf(buf, "always [madvise] never\n");
       else
               return sprintf(buf, "always madvise [never]\n");

is probably nice for a kernel developer or experimental user poking
around in sysfs.  But sysfs is mostly meant for programs to read and
write, and this format is unnecessarily complex for a program to parse.

Please use separate attributes for the current value and available
values, like cpufreq does.  I know there are other examples of the above
format, but not everything already in sysfs is a *good* example!

This, on the other hand, is totally ridiculous:

       if (test_bit(flag, &transparent_hugepage_flags))
               return sprintf(buf, "[yes] no\n");
       else
               return sprintf(buf, "yes [no]\n");

Why show the possible values of a boolean?  I can't even find any
examples of 'yes' and 'no' rather than '1' and '0'.

And really, why add boolean flags for a tristate at all?

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 828 bytes --]

             reply	other threads:[~2011-03-21  3:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-03-21  3:00 Ben Hutchings [this message]
2011-03-21 12:42 ` sysfs interface to transparent hugepages Andrea Arcangeli
2011-03-21 13:13   ` Ben Hutchings
2011-03-21 14:08     ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-03-21 14:25       ` Ben Hutchings

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1300676431.26693.317.camel@localhost \
    --to=ben@decadent.org.uk \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).