From: Ying Han <yinghan@google.com>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>,
Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>, Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Zhu Yanhai <zhu.yanhai@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: [PATCH V4 07/10] Add per-memcg zone "unreclaimable"
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 15:54:26 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1302821669-29862-8-git-send-email-yinghan@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1302821669-29862-1-git-send-email-yinghan@google.com>
After reclaiming each node per memcg, it checks mem_cgroup_watermark_ok()
and breaks the priority loop if it returns true. The per-memcg zone will
be marked as "unreclaimable" if the scanning rate is much greater than the
reclaiming rate on the per-memcg LRU. The bit is cleared when there is a
page charged to the memcg being freed. Kswapd breaks the priority loop if
all the zones are marked as "unreclaimable".
changelog v4..v3:
1. split off from the per-memcg background reclaim patch in V3.
Signed-off-by: Ying Han <yinghan@google.com>
---
include/linux/memcontrol.h | 30 ++++++++++++++
include/linux/swap.h | 2 +
mm/memcontrol.c | 96 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
mm/vmscan.c | 19 +++++++++
4 files changed, 147 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
index d4ff7f2..a8159f5 100644
--- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
+++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
@@ -155,6 +155,12 @@ static inline void mem_cgroup_dec_page_stat(struct page *page,
unsigned long mem_cgroup_soft_limit_reclaim(struct zone *zone, int order,
gfp_t gfp_mask);
u64 mem_cgroup_get_limit(struct mem_cgroup *mem);
+void mem_cgroup_clear_unreclaimable(struct mem_cgroup *mem, struct page *page);
+bool mem_cgroup_zone_reclaimable(struct mem_cgroup *mem, int nid, int zid);
+bool mem_cgroup_mz_unreclaimable(struct mem_cgroup *mem, struct zone *zone);
+void mem_cgroup_mz_set_unreclaimable(struct mem_cgroup *mem, struct zone *zone);
+void mem_cgroup_mz_pages_scanned(struct mem_cgroup *mem, struct zone* zone,
+ unsigned long nr_scanned);
#ifdef CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE
void mem_cgroup_split_huge_fixup(struct page *head, struct page *tail);
@@ -345,6 +351,25 @@ static inline void mem_cgroup_dec_page_stat(struct page *page,
{
}
+static inline void mem_cgroup_mz_pages_scanned(struct mem_cgroup *mem,
+ struct zone *zone,
+ unsigned long nr_scanned)
+{
+}
+
+static inline void mem_cgroup_clear_unreclaimable(struct page *page,
+ struct zone *zone)
+{
+}
+static inline void mem_cgroup_mz_set_unreclaimable(struct mem_cgroup *mem,
+ struct zone *zone)
+{
+}
+static inline bool mem_cgroup_mz_unreclaimable(struct mem_cgroup *mem,
+ struct zone *zone)
+{
+}
+
static inline
unsigned long mem_cgroup_soft_limit_reclaim(struct zone *zone, int order,
gfp_t gfp_mask)
@@ -363,6 +388,11 @@ static inline void mem_cgroup_split_huge_fixup(struct page *head,
{
}
+static inline bool mem_cgroup_zone_reclaimable(struct mem_cgroup *mem, int nid,
+ int zid)
+{
+ return false;
+}
#endif /* CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_CONT */
#if !defined(CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR) || !defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_VM)
diff --git a/include/linux/swap.h b/include/linux/swap.h
index 17e0511..319b800 100644
--- a/include/linux/swap.h
+++ b/include/linux/swap.h
@@ -160,6 +160,8 @@ enum {
SWP_SCANNING = (1 << 8), /* refcount in scan_swap_map */
};
+#define ZONE_RECLAIMABLE_RATE 6
+
#define SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX 32
#define COMPACT_CLUSTER_MAX SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index e22351a..da6a130 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -133,7 +133,10 @@ struct mem_cgroup_per_zone {
bool on_tree;
struct mem_cgroup *mem; /* Back pointer, we cannot */
/* use container_of */
+ unsigned long pages_scanned; /* since last reclaim */
+ bool all_unreclaimable; /* All pages pinned */
};
+
/* Macro for accessing counter */
#define MEM_CGROUP_ZSTAT(mz, idx) ((mz)->count[(idx)])
@@ -1135,6 +1138,96 @@ mem_cgroup_get_reclaim_stat_from_page(struct page *page)
return &mz->reclaim_stat;
}
+static unsigned long mem_cgroup_zone_reclaimable_pages(
+ struct mem_cgroup_per_zone *mz)
+{
+ int nr;
+ nr = MEM_CGROUP_ZSTAT(mz, LRU_ACTIVE_FILE) +
+ MEM_CGROUP_ZSTAT(mz, LRU_INACTIVE_FILE);
+
+ if (nr_swap_pages > 0)
+ nr += MEM_CGROUP_ZSTAT(mz, LRU_ACTIVE_ANON) +
+ MEM_CGROUP_ZSTAT(mz, LRU_INACTIVE_ANON);
+
+ return nr;
+}
+
+void mem_cgroup_mz_pages_scanned(struct mem_cgroup *mem, struct zone* zone,
+ unsigned long nr_scanned)
+{
+ struct mem_cgroup_per_zone *mz = NULL;
+ int nid = zone_to_nid(zone);
+ int zid = zone_idx(zone);
+
+ if (!mem)
+ return;
+
+ mz = mem_cgroup_zoneinfo(mem, nid, zid);
+ if (mz)
+ mz->pages_scanned += nr_scanned;
+}
+
+bool mem_cgroup_zone_reclaimable(struct mem_cgroup *mem, int nid, int zid)
+{
+ struct mem_cgroup_per_zone *mz = NULL;
+
+ if (!mem)
+ return 0;
+
+ mz = mem_cgroup_zoneinfo(mem, nid, zid);
+ if (mz)
+ return mz->pages_scanned <
+ mem_cgroup_zone_reclaimable_pages(mz) *
+ ZONE_RECLAIMABLE_RATE;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+bool mem_cgroup_mz_unreclaimable(struct mem_cgroup *mem, struct zone *zone)
+{
+ struct mem_cgroup_per_zone *mz = NULL;
+ int nid = zone_to_nid(zone);
+ int zid = zone_idx(zone);
+
+ if (!mem)
+ return false;
+
+ mz = mem_cgroup_zoneinfo(mem, nid, zid);
+ if (mz)
+ return mz->all_unreclaimable;
+
+ return false;
+}
+
+void mem_cgroup_mz_set_unreclaimable(struct mem_cgroup *mem, struct zone *zone)
+{
+ struct mem_cgroup_per_zone *mz = NULL;
+ int nid = zone_to_nid(zone);
+ int zid = zone_idx(zone);
+
+ if (!mem)
+ return;
+
+ mz = mem_cgroup_zoneinfo(mem, nid, zid);
+ if (mz)
+ mz->all_unreclaimable = true;
+}
+
+void mem_cgroup_clear_unreclaimable(struct mem_cgroup *mem, struct page *page)
+{
+ struct mem_cgroup_per_zone *mz = NULL;
+
+ if (!mem)
+ return;
+
+ mz = page_cgroup_zoneinfo(mem, page);
+ if (mz) {
+ mz->pages_scanned = 0;
+ mz->all_unreclaimable = false;
+ }
+
+ return;
+}
+
unsigned long mem_cgroup_isolate_pages(unsigned long nr_to_scan,
struct list_head *dst,
unsigned long *scanned, int order,
@@ -2801,6 +2894,7 @@ __mem_cgroup_uncharge_common(struct page *page, enum charge_type ctype)
* special functions.
*/
+ mem_cgroup_clear_unreclaimable(mem, page);
unlock_page_cgroup(pc);
/*
* even after unlock, we have mem->res.usage here and this memcg
@@ -4569,6 +4663,8 @@ static int alloc_mem_cgroup_per_zone_info(struct mem_cgroup *mem, int node)
mz->usage_in_excess = 0;
mz->on_tree = false;
mz->mem = mem;
+ mz->pages_scanned = 0;
+ mz->all_unreclaimable = false;
}
return 0;
}
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index b8345d2..c081112 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -1414,6 +1414,9 @@ shrink_inactive_list(unsigned long nr_to_scan, struct zone *zone,
ISOLATE_BOTH : ISOLATE_INACTIVE,
zone, sc->mem_cgroup,
0, file);
+
+ mem_cgroup_mz_pages_scanned(sc->mem_cgroup, zone, nr_scanned);
+
/*
* mem_cgroup_isolate_pages() keeps track of
* scanned pages on its own.
@@ -1533,6 +1536,7 @@ static void shrink_active_list(unsigned long nr_pages, struct zone *zone,
* mem_cgroup_isolate_pages() keeps track of
* scanned pages on its own.
*/
+ mem_cgroup_mz_pages_scanned(sc->mem_cgroup, zone, pgscanned);
}
reclaim_stat->recent_scanned[file] += nr_taken;
@@ -2648,6 +2652,7 @@ static void balance_pgdat_node(pg_data_t *pgdat, int order,
unsigned long total_scanned = 0;
struct mem_cgroup *mem_cont = sc->mem_cgroup;
int priority = sc->priority;
+ int nid = pgdat->node_id;
/*
* Now scan the zone in the dma->highmem direction, and we scan
@@ -2664,10 +2669,20 @@ static void balance_pgdat_node(pg_data_t *pgdat, int order,
if (!populated_zone(zone))
continue;
+ if (mem_cgroup_mz_unreclaimable(mem_cont, zone) &&
+ priority != DEF_PRIORITY)
+ continue;
+
sc->nr_scanned = 0;
shrink_zone(priority, zone, sc);
total_scanned += sc->nr_scanned;
+ if (mem_cgroup_mz_unreclaimable(mem_cont, zone))
+ continue;
+
+ if (!mem_cgroup_zone_reclaimable(mem_cont, nid, i))
+ mem_cgroup_mz_set_unreclaimable(mem_cont, zone);
+
/*
* If we've done a decent amount of scanning and
* the reclaim ratio is low, start doing writepage
@@ -2752,6 +2767,10 @@ loop_again:
if (!populated_zone(zone))
continue;
+
+ if (!mem_cgroup_mz_unreclaimable(mem_cont,
+ zone))
+ break;
}
if (i < 0)
node_clear(nid, do_nodes);
--
1.7.3.1
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-14 22:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-14 22:54 [PATCH V4 00/10] memcg: per cgroup background reclaim Ying Han
2011-04-14 22:54 ` [PATCH V4 01/10] Add kswapd descriptor Ying Han
2011-04-15 0:04 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-04-15 3:35 ` Ying Han
2011-04-15 4:16 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-04-15 21:46 ` Ying Han
2011-04-14 22:54 ` [PATCH V4 02/10] Add per memcg reclaim watermarks Ying Han
2011-04-15 0:16 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-04-15 3:45 ` Ying Han
2011-04-14 22:54 ` [PATCH V4 03/10] New APIs to adjust per-memcg wmarks Ying Han
2011-04-15 0:25 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-04-15 4:00 ` Ying Han
2011-04-14 22:54 ` [PATCH V4 04/10] Infrastructure to support per-memcg reclaim Ying Han
2011-04-15 0:34 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-04-15 4:04 ` Ying Han
2011-04-14 22:54 ` [PATCH V4 05/10] Implement the select_victim_node within memcg Ying Han
2011-04-15 0:40 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-04-15 4:36 ` Ying Han
2011-04-14 22:54 ` [PATCH V4 06/10] Per-memcg background reclaim Ying Han
2011-04-15 1:11 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-04-15 6:08 ` Ying Han
2011-04-15 8:14 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-04-15 18:00 ` Ying Han
2011-04-15 6:26 ` Ying Han
2011-04-14 22:54 ` Ying Han [this message]
2011-04-15 1:32 ` [PATCH V4 07/10] Add per-memcg zone "unreclaimable" KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-03-19 8:27 ` Zhu Yanhai
2012-03-20 5:45 ` Ying Han
2012-03-22 1:13 ` Zhu Yanhai
2011-04-14 22:54 ` [PATCH V4 08/10] Enable per-memcg background reclaim Ying Han
2011-04-15 1:34 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-04-14 22:54 ` [PATCH V4 09/10] Add API to export per-memcg kswapd pid Ying Han
2011-04-15 1:40 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-04-15 4:47 ` Ying Han
2011-04-14 22:54 ` [PATCH V4 10/10] Add some per-memcg stats Ying Han
2011-04-15 9:40 ` [PATCH V4 00/10] memcg: per cgroup background reclaim Michal Hocko
2011-04-15 16:40 ` Ying Han
2011-04-18 9:13 ` Michal Hocko
2011-04-18 17:01 ` Ying Han
2011-04-18 18:42 ` Michal Hocko
2011-04-18 22:27 ` Ying Han
2011-04-19 2:48 ` Zhu Yanhai
2011-04-19 3:46 ` Ying Han
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1302821669-29862-8-git-send-email-yinghan@google.com \
--to=yinghan@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
--cc=nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=xemul@openvz.org \
--cc=zhu.yanhai@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).