linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ying Han <yinghan@google.com>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>,
	Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>,
	Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>, Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
	Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Zhu Yanhai <zhu.yanhai@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: [PATCH V2 1/2] Add the soft_limit reclaim in global direct reclaim.
Date: Mon,  2 May 2011 09:50:24 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1304355025-1421-2-git-send-email-yinghan@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1304355025-1421-1-git-send-email-yinghan@google.com>

We recently added the change in global background reclaim which
counts the return value of soft_limit reclaim. Now this patch adds
the similar logic on global direct reclaim.

We should skip scanning global LRU on shrink_zone if soft_limit reclaim
does enough work. This is the first step where we start with counting
the nr_scanned and nr_reclaimed from soft_limit reclaim into global
scan_control.

no change since v1.

Signed-off-by: Ying Han <yinghan@google.com>
---
 mm/vmscan.c |   16 ++++++++++++++--
 1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index b3a569f..84003cc 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -1959,11 +1959,14 @@ restart:
  * If a zone is deemed to be full of pinned pages then just give it a light
  * scan then give up on it.
  */
-static void shrink_zones(int priority, struct zonelist *zonelist,
+static unsigned long shrink_zones(int priority, struct zonelist *zonelist,
 					struct scan_control *sc)
 {
 	struct zoneref *z;
 	struct zone *zone;
+	unsigned long nr_soft_reclaimed;
+	unsigned long nr_soft_scanned;
+	unsigned long total_scanned = 0;
 
 	for_each_zone_zonelist_nodemask(zone, z, zonelist,
 					gfp_zone(sc->gfp_mask), sc->nodemask) {
@@ -1980,8 +1983,17 @@ static void shrink_zones(int priority, struct zonelist *zonelist,
 				continue;	/* Let kswapd poll it */
 		}
 
+		nr_soft_scanned = 0;
+		nr_soft_reclaimed = mem_cgroup_soft_limit_reclaim(zone,
+							sc->order, sc->gfp_mask,
+							&nr_soft_scanned);
+		sc->nr_reclaimed += nr_soft_reclaimed;
+		total_scanned += nr_soft_scanned;
+
 		shrink_zone(priority, zone, sc);
 	}
+
+	return total_scanned;
 }
 
 static bool zone_reclaimable(struct zone *zone)
@@ -2045,7 +2057,7 @@ static unsigned long do_try_to_free_pages(struct zonelist *zonelist,
 		sc->nr_scanned = 0;
 		if (!priority)
 			disable_swap_token();
-		shrink_zones(priority, zonelist, sc);
+		total_scanned += shrink_zones(priority, zonelist, sc);
 		/*
 		 * Don't shrink slabs when reclaiming memory from
 		 * over limit cgroups
-- 
1.7.3.1

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2011-05-02 16:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-02 16:50 [PATCH V2 0/2] memcg:add the soft_limit reclaim in global direct reclaim Ying Han
2011-05-02 16:50 ` Ying Han [this message]
2011-05-02 16:52   ` [PATCH V2 1/2] Add " Ying Han
2011-05-03 13:25   ` Rik van Riel
2011-05-02 16:50 ` [PATCH V2 2/2] Add stats to monitor soft_limit reclaim Ying Han
2011-05-02 16:52   ` Ying Han
2011-05-03 13:54   ` Rik van Riel
2011-05-03 16:59     ` Ying Han

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1304355025-1421-2-git-send-email-yinghan@google.com \
    --to=yinghan@google.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
    --cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
    --cc=nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=xemul@openvz.org \
    --cc=zhu.yanhai@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).