linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, joe@perches.com, mingo@elte.hu,
	mina86@mina86.com, apw@canonical.com, jirislaby@gmail.com,
	rientjes@google.com, dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] comm: Introduce comm_lock spinlock to protect task->comm access
Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 21:11:36 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1305691896.2915.136.camel@work-vm> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DD3287A.2030808@jp.fujitsu.com>

On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 11:01 +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> > diff --git a/fs/exec.c b/fs/exec.c
> > index 5e62d26..34fa611 100644
> > --- a/fs/exec.c
> > +++ b/fs/exec.c
> > @@ -998,17 +998,28 @@ static void flush_old_files(struct files_struct * files)
> > 
> >   char *get_task_comm(char *buf, struct task_struct *tsk)
> >   {
> > -	/* buf must be at least sizeof(tsk->comm) in size */
> > -	task_lock(tsk);
> > +	unsigned long flags;
> > +
> > +	spin_lock_irqsave(&tsk->comm_lock, flags);
> >   	strncpy(buf, tsk->comm, sizeof(tsk->comm));
> > -	task_unlock(tsk);
> > +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tsk->comm_lock, flags);
> >   	return buf;
> >   }
> > 
> >   void set_task_comm(struct task_struct *tsk, char *buf)
> >   {
> > +	unsigned long flags;
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * XXX - Even though comm is protected by comm_lock,
> > +	 * we take the task_lock here to serialize against
> > +	 * current users that directly access comm.
> > +	 * Once those users are removed, we can drop the
> > +	 * task locking&  memsetting.
> > +	 */
> 
> If we provide __get_task_comm(), we can't remove memset() forever.

True enough. I'll fix that comment up then.

> 
> >   	task_lock(tsk);
> > +	spin_lock_irqsave(&tsk->comm_lock, flags);
> 
> This is strange order. task_lock() doesn't disable interrupt.

Strange order? Can you explain why you think that is? Having comm_lock
as an inner-most lock seems quite reasonable, given the limited nature
of what it protects.

> And, can you please document why we need interrupt disabling?

Since we might access current->comm from irq context. Where would you
like this documented? Just there in the code?

thanks
-john


--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2011-05-18  4:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-18  1:41 [PATCH 0/4] v6 Improve task->comm locking situation John Stultz
2011-05-18  1:41 ` [PATCH 1/4] comm: Introduce comm_lock spinlock to protect task->comm access John Stultz
2011-05-18  2:01   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-18  4:11     ` John Stultz [this message]
2011-05-18  5:06       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-18  1:41 ` [PATCH 2/4] comm: Add lock-free task->comm accessor John Stultz
2011-05-18  1:41 ` [PATCH 3/4] printk: Add %ptc to safely print a task's comm John Stultz
2011-05-18  1:41 ` [PATCH 4/4] checkpatch.pl: Add check for task comm references John Stultz
2011-05-18  6:25 ` [PATCH 0/4] v6 Improve task->comm locking situation Ingo Molnar
2011-05-18  7:05   ` Andrew Morton
2011-05-18  7:58     ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-18 19:03   ` John Stultz
2011-05-18 19:33     ` Andrew Morton
2011-05-18 19:48       ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-18 19:56         ` Andrew Morton
2011-05-18 20:48           ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-18 19:58 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-05-20 10:41   ` KOSAKI Motohiro

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1305691896.2915.136.camel@work-vm \
    --to=john.stultz@linaro.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=apw@canonical.com \
    --cc=dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=jirislaby@gmail.com \
    --cc=joe@perches.com \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mina86@mina86.com \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).