From: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, joe@perches.com, mingo@elte.hu,
mina86@mina86.com, apw@canonical.com, jirislaby@gmail.com,
rientjes@google.com, dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] comm: Introduce comm_lock spinlock to protect task->comm access
Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 21:11:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1305691896.2915.136.camel@work-vm> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DD3287A.2030808@jp.fujitsu.com>
On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 11:01 +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> > diff --git a/fs/exec.c b/fs/exec.c
> > index 5e62d26..34fa611 100644
> > --- a/fs/exec.c
> > +++ b/fs/exec.c
> > @@ -998,17 +998,28 @@ static void flush_old_files(struct files_struct * files)
> >
> > char *get_task_comm(char *buf, struct task_struct *tsk)
> > {
> > - /* buf must be at least sizeof(tsk->comm) in size */
> > - task_lock(tsk);
> > + unsigned long flags;
> > +
> > + spin_lock_irqsave(&tsk->comm_lock, flags);
> > strncpy(buf, tsk->comm, sizeof(tsk->comm));
> > - task_unlock(tsk);
> > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tsk->comm_lock, flags);
> > return buf;
> > }
> >
> > void set_task_comm(struct task_struct *tsk, char *buf)
> > {
> > + unsigned long flags;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * XXX - Even though comm is protected by comm_lock,
> > + * we take the task_lock here to serialize against
> > + * current users that directly access comm.
> > + * Once those users are removed, we can drop the
> > + * task locking& memsetting.
> > + */
>
> If we provide __get_task_comm(), we can't remove memset() forever.
True enough. I'll fix that comment up then.
>
> > task_lock(tsk);
> > + spin_lock_irqsave(&tsk->comm_lock, flags);
>
> This is strange order. task_lock() doesn't disable interrupt.
Strange order? Can you explain why you think that is? Having comm_lock
as an inner-most lock seems quite reasonable, given the limited nature
of what it protects.
> And, can you please document why we need interrupt disabling?
Since we might access current->comm from irq context. Where would you
like this documented? Just there in the code?
thanks
-john
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-18 4:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-18 1:41 [PATCH 0/4] v6 Improve task->comm locking situation John Stultz
2011-05-18 1:41 ` [PATCH 1/4] comm: Introduce comm_lock spinlock to protect task->comm access John Stultz
2011-05-18 2:01 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-18 4:11 ` John Stultz [this message]
2011-05-18 5:06 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-18 1:41 ` [PATCH 2/4] comm: Add lock-free task->comm accessor John Stultz
2011-05-18 1:41 ` [PATCH 3/4] printk: Add %ptc to safely print a task's comm John Stultz
2011-05-18 1:41 ` [PATCH 4/4] checkpatch.pl: Add check for task comm references John Stultz
2011-05-18 6:25 ` [PATCH 0/4] v6 Improve task->comm locking situation Ingo Molnar
2011-05-18 7:05 ` Andrew Morton
2011-05-18 7:58 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-18 19:03 ` John Stultz
2011-05-18 19:33 ` Andrew Morton
2011-05-18 19:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-18 19:56 ` Andrew Morton
2011-05-18 20:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-18 19:58 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-05-20 10:41 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1305691896.2915.136.camel@work-vm \
--to=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=apw@canonical.com \
--cc=dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=jirislaby@gmail.com \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mina86@mina86.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).