From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail144.messagelabs.com (mail144.messagelabs.com [216.82.254.51]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 092A06B0169 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 06:52:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: from canuck.infradead.org ([2001:4978:20e::1]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1QmOCE-0002Kg-VV for linux-mm@kvack.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 10:52:07 +0000 Received: from j77219.upc-j.chello.nl ([24.132.77.219] helo=dyad.programming.kicks-ass.net) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1QmOCE-0001Tg-Ez for linux-mm@kvack.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 10:52:06 +0000 Subject: Re: possible recursive locking detected cache_alloc_refill() + cache_flusharray() From: Peter Zijlstra In-Reply-To: References: <20110716211850.GA23917@breakpoint.cc> <1311168638.5345.80.camel@twins> <1311176680.29152.20.camel@twins> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 12:56:39 +0200 Message-ID: <1311850599.2617.107.camel@laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Pekka Enberg Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Sebastian Siewior , Christoph Lameter , Matt Mackall , linux-mm@kvack.org On Thu, 2011-07-28 at 13:46 +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote: > On Wed, 20 Jul 2011, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > We just need to annotate the SLAB_DEBUG_OBJECTS slab with a different > > key. Something like the below, except that doesn't quite cover cpu > > hotplug yet I think.. /me pokes more > > > > Completely untested, hasn't even seen a compiler etc.. > > Ping? Did someone send me a patch I can apply? I've queued a slightly updated patch for the lockdep tree. It should hopefully hit -tip soonish. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: email@kvack.org