From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: select_task_rq_fair: WARNING: at kernel/lockdep.c match_held_lock
Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2011 14:36:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1312547780.28695.1.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110804155347.GB3562@swordfish.minsk.epam.com>
On Thu, 2011-08-04 at 18:53 +0300, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
>
> Nope, that's `if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!class))'
>
The below is what I've come up with.
---
Subject: lockdep: Fix wrong assumption in match_held_lock
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Date: Fri Aug 05 14:26:17 CEST 2011
match_held_lock() was assuming it was being called on a lock class
that had already seen usage.
This condition was true for bug-free code using lockdep_assert_held(),
since you're in fact holding the lock when calling it. However the
assumption fails the moment you assume the assertion can fail, which
is the whole point of having the assertion in the first place.
Anyway, now that there's more lockdep_is_held() users, notably
__rcu_dereference_check(), its much easier to trigger this since we
test for a number of locks and we only need to hold any one of them to
be good.
Reported-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
---
kernel/lockdep.c | 8 +++++++-
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/lockdep.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/lockdep.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/lockdep.c
@@ -3111,7 +3111,13 @@ static int match_held_lock(struct held_l
if (!class)
class = look_up_lock_class(lock, 0);
- if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!class))
+ /*
+ * If look_up_lock_class() failed to find a class, we're trying
+ * to test if we hold a lock that has never yet been acquired.
+ * Clearly if the lock hasn't been acquired _ever_, we're not
+ * holding it either, so report failure.
+ */
+ if (!class)
return 0;
if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!hlock->nest_lock))
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-05 12:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-04 14:13 select_task_rq_fair: WARNING: at kernel/lockdep.c match_held_lock Sergey Senozhatsky
2011-08-04 15:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-04 15:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-04 15:37 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2011-08-04 15:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-04 15:53 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2011-08-04 15:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-04 16:04 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2011-08-05 12:36 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2011-08-05 15:27 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2011-08-06 19:39 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1312547780.28695.1.camel@twins \
--to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).