Re: [PATCH 2/5] writeback: dirty position control

Wu Fengguang
2011-08-26T13:24:50Z

On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 09:18:21PM +0800, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-08-26 at 21:13 +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> > We got similar result as in the read disturber case, even though one
> > disturbs N and the other impacts writeout bandwith. The original
> > patchset is consistently performing much better :)
>
> It does indeed, and I figure on these timescales it makes sense to
> assumes N is a constant. Fair enough, thanks!

Thank you! Glad that we finally reaches some consensus :)

Thanks,
Fengguang