From: Johannes Weiner <jweiner@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>, Ying Han <yinghan@google.com>,
Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>,
Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Subject: [patch 2/2] mm: vmscan: drop nr_force_scan[] from get_scan_count
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 22:31:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1313094715-31187-2-git-send-email-jweiner@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1313094715-31187-1-git-send-email-jweiner@redhat.com>
The nr_force_scan[] tuple holds the effective scan numbers for anon
and file pages in case the situation called for a forced scan and the
regularly calculated scan numbers turned out zero.
However, the effective scan number can always be assumed to be
SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX right before the division into anon and file. The
numerators and denominator are properly set up for all cases, be it
force scan for just file, just anon, or both, to do the right thing.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <jweiner@redhat.com>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Cc: Ying Han <yinghan@google.com>
Cc: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
---
mm/vmscan.c | 24 ++----------------------
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 96061d7..45f0986 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -1831,7 +1831,6 @@ static void get_scan_count(struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc,
enum lru_list l;
int noswap = 0;
bool force_scan = false;
- unsigned long nr_force_scan[2];
/* kswapd does zone balancing and need to scan this zone */
if (scanning_global_lru(sc) && current_is_kswapd())
@@ -1846,8 +1845,6 @@ static void get_scan_count(struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc,
fraction[0] = 0;
fraction[1] = 1;
denominator = 1;
- nr_force_scan[0] = 0;
- nr_force_scan[1] = SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX;
goto out;
}
@@ -1864,8 +1861,6 @@ static void get_scan_count(struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc,
fraction[0] = 1;
fraction[1] = 0;
denominator = 1;
- nr_force_scan[0] = SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX;
- nr_force_scan[1] = 0;
goto out;
}
}
@@ -1914,11 +1909,6 @@ static void get_scan_count(struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc,
fraction[0] = ap;
fraction[1] = fp;
denominator = ap + fp + 1;
- if (force_scan) {
- unsigned long scan = SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX;
- nr_force_scan[0] = div64_u64(scan * ap, denominator);
- nr_force_scan[1] = div64_u64(scan * fp, denominator);
- }
out:
for_each_evictable_lru(l) {
int file = is_file_lru(l);
@@ -1927,20 +1917,10 @@ out:
scan = zone_nr_lru_pages(zone, sc, l);
if (priority || noswap) {
scan >>= priority;
+ if (!scan && force_scan)
+ scan = SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX;
scan = div64_u64(scan * fraction[file], denominator);
}
-
- /*
- * If zone is small or memcg is small, nr[l] can be 0.
- * This results no-scan on this priority and priority drop down.
- * For global direct reclaim, it can visit next zone and tend
- * not to have problems. For global kswapd, it's for zone
- * balancing and it need to scan a small amounts. When using
- * memcg, priority drop can cause big latency. So, it's better
- * to scan small amount. See may_noscan above.
- */
- if (!scan && force_scan)
- scan = nr_force_scan[file];
nr[l] = scan;
}
}
--
1.7.6
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-11 20:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-11 20:31 [patch 1/2] mm: vmscan: fix force-scanning small targets without swap Johannes Weiner
2011-08-11 20:31 ` Johannes Weiner [this message]
2011-08-11 23:44 ` [patch 2/2] mm: vmscan: drop nr_force_scan[] from get_scan_count Minchan Kim
2011-08-12 6:58 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-08-12 7:04 ` Minchan Kim
2011-08-12 13:33 ` Michal Hocko
2011-08-17 14:00 ` Mel Gorman
2011-08-17 1:12 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-08-11 23:16 ` [patch 1/2] mm: vmscan: fix force-scanning small targets without swap Minchan Kim
2011-08-12 13:10 ` Michal Hocko
2011-08-12 13:13 ` Michal Hocko
2011-08-17 1:12 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-08-17 13:38 ` Mel Gorman
2011-08-29 16:08 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-08-31 23:37 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1313094715-31187-2-git-send-email-jweiner@redhat.com \
--to=jweiner@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bsingharora@gmail.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
--cc=yinghan@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).