linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johannes Weiner <jweiner@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>,
	Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>,
	Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>,
	Ying Han <yinghan@google.com>, Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>,
	Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [patch 02/10] mm: vmscan: distinguish global reclaim from global LRU scanning
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 23:00:56 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1317330064-28893-3-git-send-email-jweiner@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1317330064-28893-1-git-send-email-jweiner@redhat.com>

The traditional zone reclaim code is scanning the per-zone LRU lists
during direct reclaim and kswapd, and the per-zone per-memory cgroup
LRU lists when reclaiming on behalf of a memory cgroup limit.

Subsequent patches will convert the traditional reclaim code to
reclaim exclusively from the per-memory cgroup LRU lists.  As a
result, using the predicate for which LRU list is scanned will no
longer be appropriate to tell global reclaim from limit reclaim.

This patch adds a global_reclaim() predicate to tell direct/kswapd
reclaim from memory cgroup limit reclaim and substitutes it in all
places where currently scanning_global_lru() is used for that.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <jweiner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name>
---
 mm/vmscan.c |   62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
 1 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 71b5616..4bb7f78 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -153,9 +153,25 @@ static LIST_HEAD(shrinker_list);
 static DECLARE_RWSEM(shrinker_rwsem);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR
-#define scanning_global_lru(sc)	(!(sc)->mem_cgroup)
+static bool global_reclaim(struct scan_control *sc)
+{
+	return !sc->mem_cgroup;
+}
+
+static bool scanning_global_lru(struct scan_control *sc)
+{
+	return !sc->mem_cgroup;
+}
 #else
-#define scanning_global_lru(sc)	(1)
+static bool global_reclaim(struct scan_control *sc)
+{
+	return true;
+}
+
+static bool scanning_global_lru(struct scan_control *sc)
+{
+	return true;
+}
 #endif
 
 static struct zone_reclaim_stat *get_reclaim_stat(struct zone *zone,
@@ -1011,7 +1027,7 @@ keep_lumpy:
 	 * back off and wait for congestion to clear because further reclaim
 	 * will encounter the same problem
 	 */
-	if (nr_dirty && nr_dirty == nr_congested && scanning_global_lru(sc))
+	if (nr_dirty && nr_dirty == nr_congested && global_reclaim(sc))
 		zone_set_flag(zone, ZONE_CONGESTED);
 
 	free_page_list(&free_pages);
@@ -1330,7 +1346,7 @@ static int too_many_isolated(struct zone *zone, int file,
 	if (current_is_kswapd())
 		return 0;
 
-	if (!scanning_global_lru(sc))
+	if (!global_reclaim(sc))
 		return 0;
 
 	if (file) {
@@ -1508,6 +1524,12 @@ shrink_inactive_list(unsigned long nr_to_scan, struct zone *zone,
 	if (scanning_global_lru(sc)) {
 		nr_taken = isolate_pages_global(nr_to_scan, &page_list,
 			&nr_scanned, sc->order, reclaim_mode, zone, 0, file);
+	} else {
+		nr_taken = mem_cgroup_isolate_pages(nr_to_scan, &page_list,
+			&nr_scanned, sc->order, reclaim_mode, zone,
+			sc->mem_cgroup, 0, file);
+	}
+	if (global_reclaim(sc)) {
 		zone->pages_scanned += nr_scanned;
 		if (current_is_kswapd())
 			__count_zone_vm_events(PGSCAN_KSWAPD, zone,
@@ -1515,14 +1537,6 @@ shrink_inactive_list(unsigned long nr_to_scan, struct zone *zone,
 		else
 			__count_zone_vm_events(PGSCAN_DIRECT, zone,
 					       nr_scanned);
-	} else {
-		nr_taken = mem_cgroup_isolate_pages(nr_to_scan, &page_list,
-			&nr_scanned, sc->order, reclaim_mode, zone,
-			sc->mem_cgroup, 0, file);
-		/*
-		 * mem_cgroup_isolate_pages() keeps track of
-		 * scanned pages on its own.
-		 */
 	}
 
 	if (nr_taken == 0) {
@@ -1647,18 +1661,16 @@ static void shrink_active_list(unsigned long nr_pages, struct zone *zone,
 						&pgscanned, sc->order,
 						reclaim_mode, zone,
 						1, file);
-		zone->pages_scanned += pgscanned;
 	} else {
 		nr_taken = mem_cgroup_isolate_pages(nr_pages, &l_hold,
 						&pgscanned, sc->order,
 						reclaim_mode, zone,
 						sc->mem_cgroup, 1, file);
-		/*
-		 * mem_cgroup_isolate_pages() keeps track of
-		 * scanned pages on its own.
-		 */
 	}
 
+	if (global_reclaim(sc))
+		zone->pages_scanned += pgscanned;
+
 	reclaim_stat->recent_scanned[file] += nr_taken;
 
 	__count_zone_vm_events(PGREFILL, zone, pgscanned);
@@ -1828,7 +1840,7 @@ static unsigned long shrink_list(enum lru_list lru, unsigned long nr_to_scan,
 
 static int vmscan_swappiness(struct scan_control *sc)
 {
-	if (scanning_global_lru(sc))
+	if (global_reclaim(sc))
 		return vm_swappiness;
 	return mem_cgroup_swappiness(sc->mem_cgroup);
 }
@@ -1863,9 +1875,9 @@ static void get_scan_count(struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc,
 	 * latencies, so it's better to scan a minimum amount there as
 	 * well.
 	 */
-	if (scanning_global_lru(sc) && current_is_kswapd())
+	if (current_is_kswapd())
 		force_scan = true;
-	if (!scanning_global_lru(sc))
+	if (!global_reclaim(sc))
 		force_scan = true;
 
 	/* If we have no swap space, do not bother scanning anon pages. */
@@ -1882,7 +1894,7 @@ static void get_scan_count(struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc,
 	file  = zone_nr_lru_pages(zone, sc, LRU_ACTIVE_FILE) +
 		zone_nr_lru_pages(zone, sc, LRU_INACTIVE_FILE);
 
-	if (scanning_global_lru(sc)) {
+	if (global_reclaim(sc)) {
 		free  = zone_page_state(zone, NR_FREE_PAGES);
 		/* If we have very few page cache pages,
 		   force-scan anon pages. */
@@ -2109,7 +2121,7 @@ static void shrink_zones(int priority, struct zonelist *zonelist,
 		 * Take care memory controller reclaiming has small influence
 		 * to global LRU.
 		 */
-		if (scanning_global_lru(sc)) {
+		if (global_reclaim(sc)) {
 			if (!cpuset_zone_allowed_hardwall(zone, GFP_KERNEL))
 				continue;
 			if (zone->all_unreclaimable && priority != DEF_PRIORITY)
@@ -2188,7 +2200,7 @@ static unsigned long do_try_to_free_pages(struct zonelist *zonelist,
 	get_mems_allowed();
 	delayacct_freepages_start();
 
-	if (scanning_global_lru(sc))
+	if (global_reclaim(sc))
 		count_vm_event(ALLOCSTALL);
 
 	for (priority = DEF_PRIORITY; priority >= 0; priority--) {
@@ -2200,7 +2212,7 @@ static unsigned long do_try_to_free_pages(struct zonelist *zonelist,
 		 * Don't shrink slabs when reclaiming memory from
 		 * over limit cgroups
 		 */
-		if (scanning_global_lru(sc)) {
+		if (global_reclaim(sc)) {
 			unsigned long lru_pages = 0;
 			for_each_zone_zonelist(zone, z, zonelist,
 					gfp_zone(sc->gfp_mask)) {
@@ -2261,7 +2273,7 @@ out:
 		return 0;
 
 	/* top priority shrink_zones still had more to do? don't OOM, then */
-	if (scanning_global_lru(sc) && !all_unreclaimable(zonelist, sc))
+	if (global_reclaim(sc) && !all_unreclaimable(zonelist, sc))
 		return 1;
 
 	return 0;
-- 
1.7.6.2

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-09-29 21:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-09-29 21:00 [patch 00/10] memcg naturalization -rc4 Johannes Weiner
2011-09-29 21:00 ` [patch 01/10] mm: memcg: consolidate hierarchy iteration primitives Johannes Weiner
2011-09-29 21:00 ` Johannes Weiner [this message]
2011-09-29 21:00 ` [patch 03/10] mm: vmscan: distinguish between memcg triggering reclaim and memcg being scanned Johannes Weiner
2011-09-29 21:00 ` [patch 04/10] mm: memcg: per-priority per-zone hierarchy scan generations Johannes Weiner
2011-09-30  9:25   ` Michal Hocko
2011-09-29 21:00 ` [patch 05/10] mm: move memcg hierarchy reclaim to generic reclaim code Johannes Weiner
2011-09-29 21:01 ` [patch 06/10] mm: memcg: remove optimization of keeping the root_mem_cgroup LRU lists empty Johannes Weiner
2011-09-29 21:01 ` [patch 07/10] mm: vmscan: convert global reclaim to per-memcg LRU lists Johannes Weiner
2011-09-29 21:01 ` [patch 08/10] mm: collect LRU list heads into struct lruvec Johannes Weiner
2011-09-29 21:01 ` [patch 09/10] mm: make per-memcg LRU lists exclusive Johannes Weiner
2011-09-29 21:01 ` [patch 10/10] mm: memcg: remove unused node/section info from pc->flags Johannes Weiner
2011-09-30  8:05 ` [patch 00/10] memcg naturalization -rc4 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-09-30  9:32   ` Johannes Weiner
2011-10-03 10:04     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-09-30  9:31 ` Michal Hocko
2011-10-03 23:11 ` Andrew Morton
2011-10-04  7:47   ` Johannes Weiner
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-11-08 21:23 [patch 00/10] memcg naturalization -rc5 Johannes Weiner
2011-11-08 21:23 ` [patch 02/10] mm: vmscan: distinguish global reclaim from global LRU scanning Johannes Weiner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1317330064-28893-3-git-send-email-jweiner@redhat.com \
    --to=jweiner@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bsingharora@gmail.com \
    --cc=gthelen@google.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
    --cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
    --cc=nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=walken@google.com \
    --cc=yinghan@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).