linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johannes Weiner <jweiner@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>,
	Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>,
	Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>,
	Ying Han <yinghan@google.com>, Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>,
	Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [patch 07/10] mm: vmscan: convert global reclaim to per-memcg LRU lists
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 23:01:01 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1317330064-28893-8-git-send-email-jweiner@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1317330064-28893-1-git-send-email-jweiner@redhat.com>

The global per-zone LRU lists are about to go away on memcg-enabled
kernels, global reclaim must be able to find its pages on the
per-memcg LRU lists.

Since the LRU pages of a zone are distributed over all existing memory
cgroups, a scan target for a zone is complete when all memory cgroups
are scanned for their proportional share of a zone's memory.

The forced scanning of small scan targets from kswapd is limited to
zones marked unreclaimable, otherwise kswapd can quickly overreclaim
by force-scanning the LRU lists of multiple memory cgroups.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <jweiner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name>
---
 mm/vmscan.c |   39 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
 1 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 96acc1a..f411e7f 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -1887,7 +1887,7 @@ static void get_scan_count(struct mem_cgroup_zone *mz, struct scan_control *sc,
 	 * latencies, so it's better to scan a minimum amount there as
 	 * well.
 	 */
-	if (current_is_kswapd())
+	if (current_is_kswapd() && mz->zone->all_unreclaimable)
 		force_scan = true;
 	if (!global_reclaim(sc))
 		force_scan = true;
@@ -2111,16 +2111,6 @@ static void shrink_zone(int priority, struct zone *zone,
 	};
 	struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
 
-	if (global_reclaim(sc)) {
-		struct mem_cgroup_zone mz = {
-			.mem_cgroup = NULL,
-			.zone = zone,
-		};
-
-		shrink_mem_cgroup_zone(priority, &mz, sc);
-		return;
-	}
-
 	memcg = mem_cgroup_iter(root, NULL, &reclaim);
 	do {
 		struct mem_cgroup_zone mz = {
@@ -2134,6 +2124,10 @@ static void shrink_zone(int priority, struct zone *zone,
 		 * scanned it with decreasing priority levels until
 		 * nr_to_reclaim had been reclaimed.  This priority
 		 * cycle is thus over after a single memcg.
+		 *
+		 * Direct reclaim and kswapd, on the other hand, have
+		 * to scan all memory cgroups to fulfill the overall
+		 * scan target for the zone.
 		 */
 		if (!global_reclaim(sc)) {
 			mem_cgroup_iter_break(root, memcg);
@@ -2451,13 +2445,24 @@ unsigned long try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(struct mem_cgroup *mem_cont,
 static void age_active_anon(struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc,
 			    int priority)
 {
-	struct mem_cgroup_zone mz = {
-		.mem_cgroup = NULL,
-		.zone = zone,
-	};
+	struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
 
-	if (inactive_anon_is_low(&mz))
-		shrink_active_list(SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX, &mz, sc, priority, 0);
+	if (!total_swap_pages)
+		return;
+
+	memcg = mem_cgroup_iter(NULL, NULL, NULL);
+	do {
+		struct mem_cgroup_zone mz = {
+			.mem_cgroup = memcg,
+			.zone = zone,
+		};
+
+		if (inactive_anon_is_low(&mz))
+			shrink_active_list(SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX, &mz,
+					   sc, priority, 0);
+
+		memcg = mem_cgroup_iter(NULL, memcg, NULL);
+	} while (memcg);
 }
 
 /*
-- 
1.7.6.2

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-09-29 21:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-09-29 21:00 [patch 00/10] memcg naturalization -rc4 Johannes Weiner
2011-09-29 21:00 ` [patch 01/10] mm: memcg: consolidate hierarchy iteration primitives Johannes Weiner
2011-09-29 21:00 ` [patch 02/10] mm: vmscan: distinguish global reclaim from global LRU scanning Johannes Weiner
2011-09-29 21:00 ` [patch 03/10] mm: vmscan: distinguish between memcg triggering reclaim and memcg being scanned Johannes Weiner
2011-09-29 21:00 ` [patch 04/10] mm: memcg: per-priority per-zone hierarchy scan generations Johannes Weiner
2011-09-30  9:25   ` Michal Hocko
2011-09-29 21:00 ` [patch 05/10] mm: move memcg hierarchy reclaim to generic reclaim code Johannes Weiner
2011-09-29 21:01 ` [patch 06/10] mm: memcg: remove optimization of keeping the root_mem_cgroup LRU lists empty Johannes Weiner
2011-09-29 21:01 ` Johannes Weiner [this message]
2011-09-29 21:01 ` [patch 08/10] mm: collect LRU list heads into struct lruvec Johannes Weiner
2011-09-29 21:01 ` [patch 09/10] mm: make per-memcg LRU lists exclusive Johannes Weiner
2011-09-29 21:01 ` [patch 10/10] mm: memcg: remove unused node/section info from pc->flags Johannes Weiner
2011-09-30  8:05 ` [patch 00/10] memcg naturalization -rc4 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-09-30  9:32   ` Johannes Weiner
2011-10-03 10:04     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-09-30  9:31 ` Michal Hocko
2011-10-03 23:11 ` Andrew Morton
2011-10-04  7:47   ` Johannes Weiner
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-11-08 21:23 [patch 00/10] memcg naturalization -rc5 Johannes Weiner
2011-11-08 21:23 ` [patch 07/10] mm: vmscan: convert global reclaim to per-memcg LRU lists Johannes Weiner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1317330064-28893-8-git-send-email-jweiner@redhat.com \
    --to=jweiner@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bsingharora@gmail.com \
    --cc=gthelen@google.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
    --cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
    --cc=nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=walken@google.com \
    --cc=yinghan@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).