From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail6.bemta8.messagelabs.com (mail6.bemta8.messagelabs.com [216.82.243.55]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E96F26B002C for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 08:08:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: from j77219.upc-j.chello.nl ([24.132.77.219] helo=dyad.programming.kicks-ass.net) by casper.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1RDEeU-0000Wk-JC for linux-mm@kvack.org; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 12:08:14 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] IO-less dirty throttling v12 From: Peter Zijlstra In-Reply-To: <20111003134228.090592370@intel.com> References: <20111003134228.090592370@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 14:14:06 +0200 Message-ID: <1318248846.14400.21.camel@laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Wu Fengguang Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Jan Kara , Christoph Hellwig , Dave Chinner , Greg Thelen , Minchan Kim , Vivek Goyal , Andrea Righi , linux-mm , LKML On Mon, 2011-10-03 at 21:42 +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote: > This is the minimal IO-less balance_dirty_pages() changes that are expected to > be regression free (well, except for NFS). I can't seem to get around reviewing these patches in detail, but fwiw I'm fine with pushing fwd with this set (plus a possible NFS fix). I don't see a reason to strip it down even further. So I guess that's: Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: email@kvack.org