From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
To: Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Andy Isaacson <adi@hexapodia.org>,
Johannes Weiner <jweiner@redhat.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Nai Xia <nai.xia@gmail.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 10/11] mm: vmscan: Check if reclaim should really abort even if compaction_ready() is true for one zone
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2011 17:36:20 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1322760981-28719-11-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1322760981-28719-1-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de>
If compaction can proceed for a given zone, shrink_zones() does not
reclaim any more pages from it. After commit [e0c2327: vmscan: abort
reclaim/compaction if compaction can proceed], do_try_to_free_pages()
tries to finish as soon as possible once one zone can compact.
This was intended to prevent slabs being shrunk unnecessarily but
there are side-effects. One is that a small zone that is ready for
compaction will abort reclaim even if the chances of successfully
allocating a THP from that zone is small. It also means that reclaim
can return too early even though sc->nr_to_reclaim pages were not
reclaimed.
This partially reverts the commit until it is proven that slabs are
really being shrunk unnecessarily but preserves the check to return
1 to avoid OOM if reclaim was aborted prematurely.
[aarcange@redhat.com: This patch replaces a revert from Andrea]
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
---
mm/vmscan.c | 19 +++++++++----------
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 6c7085d..b0eeec7 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -2176,7 +2176,8 @@ static inline bool compaction_ready(struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc)
*
* This function returns true if a zone is being reclaimed for a costly
* high-order allocation and compaction is ready to begin. This indicates to
- * the caller that it should retry the allocation or fail.
+ * the caller that it should consider retrying the allocation instead of
+ * further reclaim.
*/
static bool shrink_zones(int priority, struct zonelist *zonelist,
struct scan_control *sc)
@@ -2185,7 +2186,7 @@ static bool shrink_zones(int priority, struct zonelist *zonelist,
struct zone *zone;
unsigned long nr_soft_reclaimed;
unsigned long nr_soft_scanned;
- bool should_abort_reclaim = false;
+ bool aborted_reclaim = false;
for_each_zone_zonelist_nodemask(zone, z, zonelist,
gfp_zone(sc->gfp_mask), sc->nodemask) {
@@ -2211,7 +2212,7 @@ static bool shrink_zones(int priority, struct zonelist *zonelist,
* allocations.
*/
if (compaction_ready(zone, sc)) {
- should_abort_reclaim = true;
+ aborted_reclaim = true;
continue;
}
}
@@ -2233,7 +2234,7 @@ static bool shrink_zones(int priority, struct zonelist *zonelist,
shrink_zone(priority, zone, sc);
}
- return should_abort_reclaim;
+ return aborted_reclaim;
}
static bool zone_reclaimable(struct zone *zone)
@@ -2287,7 +2288,7 @@ static unsigned long do_try_to_free_pages(struct zonelist *zonelist,
struct zoneref *z;
struct zone *zone;
unsigned long writeback_threshold;
- bool should_abort_reclaim;
+ bool aborted_reclaim;
get_mems_allowed();
delayacct_freepages_start();
@@ -2299,9 +2300,7 @@ static unsigned long do_try_to_free_pages(struct zonelist *zonelist,
sc->nr_scanned = 0;
if (!priority)
disable_swap_token(sc->mem_cgroup);
- should_abort_reclaim = shrink_zones(priority, zonelist, sc);
- if (should_abort_reclaim)
- break;
+ aborted_reclaim = shrink_zones(priority, zonelist, sc);
/*
* Don't shrink slabs when reclaiming memory from
@@ -2368,8 +2367,8 @@ out:
if (oom_killer_disabled)
return 0;
- /* Aborting reclaim to try compaction? don't OOM, then */
- if (should_abort_reclaim)
+ /* Aborted reclaim to try compaction? don't OOM, then */
+ if (aborted_reclaim)
return 1;
/* top priority shrink_zones still had more to do? don't OOM, then */
--
1.7.3.4
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-01 17:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-01 17:36 [PATCH 0/11] Reduce compaction-related stalls and improve asynchronous migration of dirty pages v5 Mel Gorman
2011-12-01 17:36 ` [PATCH 01/11] mm: compaction: Allow compaction to isolate dirty pages Mel Gorman
2011-12-01 17:36 ` [PATCH 02/11] mm: compaction: Use synchronous compaction for /proc/sys/vm/compact_memory Mel Gorman
2011-12-01 17:36 ` [PATCH 03/11] mm: vmscan: Check if we isolated a compound page during lumpy scan Mel Gorman
2011-12-01 17:36 ` [PATCH 04/11] mm: vmscan: Do not OOM if aborting reclaim to start compaction Mel Gorman
2011-12-01 17:36 ` [PATCH 05/11] mm: compaction: Determine if dirty pages can be migrated without blocking within ->migratepage Mel Gorman
2011-12-01 17:36 ` [PATCH 06/11] mm: compaction: make isolate_lru_page() filter-aware again Mel Gorman
2011-12-01 17:36 ` [PATCH 07/11] mm: page allocator: Do not call direct reclaim for THP allocations while compaction is deferred Mel Gorman
2011-12-01 17:36 ` [PATCH 08/11] mm: compaction: Introduce sync-light migration for use by compaction Mel Gorman
2011-12-01 17:36 ` [PATCH 09/11] mm: vmscan: When reclaiming for compaction, ensure there are sufficient free pages available Mel Gorman
2011-12-01 17:36 ` Mel Gorman [this message]
2011-12-01 17:36 ` [PATCH 11/11] mm: Isolate pages for immediate reclaim on their own LRU Mel Gorman
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-12-14 15:41 [PATCH 0/11] Reduce compaction-related stalls and improve asynchronous migration of dirty pages v6 Mel Gorman
2011-12-14 15:41 ` [PATCH 10/11] mm: vmscan: Check if reclaim should really abort even if compaction_ready() is true for one zone Mel Gorman
2011-12-16 4:38 ` Rik van Riel
2011-12-16 11:29 ` Mel Gorman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1322760981-28719-11-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de \
--to=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=adi@hexapodia.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jweiner@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
--cc=nai.xia@gmail.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).