linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
To: Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	Andy Isaacson <adi@hexapodia.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <jweiner@redhat.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	Nai Xia <nai.xia@gmail.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 10/11] mm: vmscan: Check if reclaim should really abort even if compaction_ready() is true for one zone
Date: Thu,  1 Dec 2011 17:36:20 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1322760981-28719-11-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1322760981-28719-1-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de>

If compaction can proceed for a given zone, shrink_zones() does not
reclaim any more pages from it. After commit [e0c2327: vmscan: abort
reclaim/compaction if compaction can proceed], do_try_to_free_pages()
tries to finish as soon as possible once one zone can compact.

This was intended to prevent slabs being shrunk unnecessarily but
there are side-effects. One is that a small zone that is ready for
compaction will abort reclaim even if the chances of successfully
allocating a THP from that zone is small. It also means that reclaim
can return too early even though sc->nr_to_reclaim pages were not
reclaimed.

This partially reverts the commit until it is proven that slabs are
really being shrunk unnecessarily but preserves the check to return
1 to avoid OOM if reclaim was aborted prematurely.

[aarcange@redhat.com: This patch replaces a revert from Andrea]
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
---
 mm/vmscan.c |   19 +++++++++----------
 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 6c7085d..b0eeec7 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -2176,7 +2176,8 @@ static inline bool compaction_ready(struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc)
  *
  * This function returns true if a zone is being reclaimed for a costly
  * high-order allocation and compaction is ready to begin. This indicates to
- * the caller that it should retry the allocation or fail.
+ * the caller that it should consider retrying the allocation instead of
+ * further reclaim.
  */
 static bool shrink_zones(int priority, struct zonelist *zonelist,
 					struct scan_control *sc)
@@ -2185,7 +2186,7 @@ static bool shrink_zones(int priority, struct zonelist *zonelist,
 	struct zone *zone;
 	unsigned long nr_soft_reclaimed;
 	unsigned long nr_soft_scanned;
-	bool should_abort_reclaim = false;
+	bool aborted_reclaim = false;
 
 	for_each_zone_zonelist_nodemask(zone, z, zonelist,
 					gfp_zone(sc->gfp_mask), sc->nodemask) {
@@ -2211,7 +2212,7 @@ static bool shrink_zones(int priority, struct zonelist *zonelist,
 				 * allocations.
 				 */
 				if (compaction_ready(zone, sc)) {
-					should_abort_reclaim = true;
+					aborted_reclaim = true;
 					continue;
 				}
 			}
@@ -2233,7 +2234,7 @@ static bool shrink_zones(int priority, struct zonelist *zonelist,
 		shrink_zone(priority, zone, sc);
 	}
 
-	return should_abort_reclaim;
+	return aborted_reclaim;
 }
 
 static bool zone_reclaimable(struct zone *zone)
@@ -2287,7 +2288,7 @@ static unsigned long do_try_to_free_pages(struct zonelist *zonelist,
 	struct zoneref *z;
 	struct zone *zone;
 	unsigned long writeback_threshold;
-	bool should_abort_reclaim;
+	bool aborted_reclaim;
 
 	get_mems_allowed();
 	delayacct_freepages_start();
@@ -2299,9 +2300,7 @@ static unsigned long do_try_to_free_pages(struct zonelist *zonelist,
 		sc->nr_scanned = 0;
 		if (!priority)
 			disable_swap_token(sc->mem_cgroup);
-		should_abort_reclaim = shrink_zones(priority, zonelist, sc);
-		if (should_abort_reclaim)
-			break;
+		aborted_reclaim = shrink_zones(priority, zonelist, sc);
 
 		/*
 		 * Don't shrink slabs when reclaiming memory from
@@ -2368,8 +2367,8 @@ out:
 	if (oom_killer_disabled)
 		return 0;
 
-	/* Aborting reclaim to try compaction? don't OOM, then */
-	if (should_abort_reclaim)
+	/* Aborted reclaim to try compaction? don't OOM, then */
+	if (aborted_reclaim)
 		return 1;
 
 	/* top priority shrink_zones still had more to do? don't OOM, then */
-- 
1.7.3.4

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-12-01 17:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-12-01 17:36 [PATCH 0/11] Reduce compaction-related stalls and improve asynchronous migration of dirty pages v5 Mel Gorman
2011-12-01 17:36 ` [PATCH 01/11] mm: compaction: Allow compaction to isolate dirty pages Mel Gorman
2011-12-01 17:36 ` [PATCH 02/11] mm: compaction: Use synchronous compaction for /proc/sys/vm/compact_memory Mel Gorman
2011-12-01 17:36 ` [PATCH 03/11] mm: vmscan: Check if we isolated a compound page during lumpy scan Mel Gorman
2011-12-01 17:36 ` [PATCH 04/11] mm: vmscan: Do not OOM if aborting reclaim to start compaction Mel Gorman
2011-12-01 17:36 ` [PATCH 05/11] mm: compaction: Determine if dirty pages can be migrated without blocking within ->migratepage Mel Gorman
2011-12-01 17:36 ` [PATCH 06/11] mm: compaction: make isolate_lru_page() filter-aware again Mel Gorman
2011-12-01 17:36 ` [PATCH 07/11] mm: page allocator: Do not call direct reclaim for THP allocations while compaction is deferred Mel Gorman
2011-12-01 17:36 ` [PATCH 08/11] mm: compaction: Introduce sync-light migration for use by compaction Mel Gorman
2011-12-01 17:36 ` [PATCH 09/11] mm: vmscan: When reclaiming for compaction, ensure there are sufficient free pages available Mel Gorman
2011-12-01 17:36 ` Mel Gorman [this message]
2011-12-01 17:36 ` [PATCH 11/11] mm: Isolate pages for immediate reclaim on their own LRU Mel Gorman
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-12-14 15:41 [PATCH 0/11] Reduce compaction-related stalls and improve asynchronous migration of dirty pages v6 Mel Gorman
2011-12-14 15:41 ` [PATCH 10/11] mm: vmscan: Check if reclaim should really abort even if compaction_ready() is true for one zone Mel Gorman
2011-12-16  4:38   ` Rik van Riel
2011-12-16 11:29     ` Mel Gorman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1322760981-28719-11-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de \
    --to=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=adi@hexapodia.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=jweiner@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
    --cc=nai.xia@gmail.com \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).