From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx201.postini.com [74.125.245.201]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9C6FE6B002C for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 21:01:22 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <1330999280.10358.3.camel@joe2Laptop> Subject: [RFC PATCH] checkpatch: Warn on use of yield() From: Joe Perches Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 18:01:20 -0800 In-Reply-To: <20120305121804.3b4daed4.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <20120302112358.GA3481@suse.de> <1330723262.11248.233.camel@twins> <20120305121804.3b4daed4.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Andrew Morton Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Mel Gorman , Miao Xie , Christoph Lameter , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Use of yield() is deprecated or at least generally undesirable. Add a checkpatch warning when it's used. Suggest cpu_relax instead. Signed-off-by: Joe Perches --- > Joe, can we please have a checkpatch rule? Something like this? scripts/checkpatch.pl | 5 +++++ 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl index e32ea7f..80ad474 100755 --- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl +++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl @@ -3300,6 +3300,11 @@ sub process { "__func__ should be used instead of gcc specific __FUNCTION__\n" . $herecurr); } +# check for use of yield() + if ($line =~ /\byield\s*\(\s*\)/ { + WARN("YIELD", + "yield() is deprecated, consider cpu_relax()\n" . $herecurr); + } # check for semaphores initialized locked if ($line =~ /^.\s*sema_init.+,\W?0\W?\)/) { WARN("CONSIDER_COMPLETION", -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: email@kvack.org