From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, davej@redhat.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.or, viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk,
jwboyer@redhat.com
Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH] hugetlbfs: lockdep annotate root inode properly
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 01:58:46 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1334608126-17295-1-git-send-email-aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
This fix the below reported false lockdep warning. e096d0c7e2e4e5893792db865dd065ac73cf1f00
did a similar annotation for every other inode in hugetlbfs but missed the root
inode because it was allocated by a separate function.
For HugeTLB fs we allow taking i_mutex in mmap. HugeTLB fs doesn't support file
write and its file read callback is modified in a05b0855fd15504972dba2358e5faa172a1e50ba
to not take i_mutex. Hence for HugeTLB fs with regular files we really don't take
i_mutex with mmap_sem held.
======================================================
[ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
3.4.0-rc1+ #322 Not tainted
-------------------------------------------------------
bash/1572 is trying to acquire lock:
(&mm->mmap_sem){++++++}, at: [<ffffffff810f1618>] might_fault+0x40/0x90
but task is already holding lock:
(&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#12){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff81125f88>] vfs_readdir+0x56/0xa8
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #1 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#12){+.+.+.}:
[<ffffffff810a09e5>] lock_acquire+0xd5/0xfa
[<ffffffff816a2f5e>] __mutex_lock_common+0x48/0x350
[<ffffffff816a3325>] mutex_lock_nested+0x2a/0x31
[<ffffffff811fb8e1>] hugetlbfs_file_mmap+0x7d/0x104
[<ffffffff810f859a>] mmap_region+0x272/0x47d
[<ffffffff810f8a39>] do_mmap_pgoff+0x294/0x2ee
[<ffffffff810f8b65>] sys_mmap_pgoff+0xd2/0x10e
[<ffffffff8103d19e>] sys_mmap+0x1d/0x1f
[<ffffffff816a5922>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
-> #0 (&mm->mmap_sem){++++++}:
[<ffffffff810a0256>] __lock_acquire+0xa81/0xd75
[<ffffffff810a09e5>] lock_acquire+0xd5/0xfa
[<ffffffff810f1645>] might_fault+0x6d/0x90
[<ffffffff81125d62>] filldir+0x6a/0xc2
[<ffffffff81133a83>] dcache_readdir+0x5c/0x222
[<ffffffff81125fa8>] vfs_readdir+0x76/0xa8
[<ffffffff811260b6>] sys_getdents+0x79/0xc9
[<ffffffff816a5922>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#12);
lock(&mm->mmap_sem);
lock(&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#12);
lock(&mm->mmap_sem);
*** DEADLOCK ***
1 lock held by bash/1572:
#0: (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#12){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff81125f88>] vfs_readdir+0x56/0xa8
stack backtrace:
Pid: 1572, comm: bash Not tainted 3.4.0-rc1+ #322
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff81699a3c>] print_circular_bug+0x1f8/0x209
[<ffffffff810a0256>] __lock_acquire+0xa81/0xd75
[<ffffffff810f38aa>] ? handle_pte_fault+0x5ff/0x614
[<ffffffff8109e622>] ? mark_lock+0x2d/0x258
[<ffffffff810f1618>] ? might_fault+0x40/0x90
[<ffffffff810a09e5>] lock_acquire+0xd5/0xfa
[<ffffffff810f1618>] ? might_fault+0x40/0x90
[<ffffffff816a3249>] ? __mutex_lock_common+0x333/0x350
[<ffffffff810f1645>] might_fault+0x6d/0x90
[<ffffffff810f1618>] ? might_fault+0x40/0x90
[<ffffffff81125d62>] filldir+0x6a/0xc2
[<ffffffff81133a83>] dcache_readdir+0x5c/0x222
[<ffffffff81125cf8>] ? sys_ioctl+0x74/0x74
[<ffffffff81125cf8>] ? sys_ioctl+0x74/0x74
[<ffffffff81125cf8>] ? sys_ioctl+0x74/0x74
[<ffffffff81125fa8>] vfs_readdir+0x76/0xa8
[<ffffffff811260b6>] sys_getdents+0x79/0xc9
[<ffffffff816a5922>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c b/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c
index 92f75aa..d8899e1 100644
--- a/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c
@@ -485,6 +485,7 @@ static struct inode *hugetlbfs_get_root(struct super_block *sb,
inode->i_fop = &simple_dir_operations;
/* directory inodes start off with i_nlink == 2 (for "." entry) */
inc_nlink(inode);
+ lockdep_annotate_inode_mutex_key(inode);
}
return inode;
}
--
1.7.10
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next reply other threads:[~2012-04-16 20:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-16 20:28 Aneesh Kumar K.V [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-03-08 9:15 [PATCH] hugetlbfs: lockdep annotate root inode properly Aneesh Kumar K.V
2012-03-08 21:02 ` Andrew Morton
2012-03-08 21:10 ` Dave Jones
2012-03-08 21:19 ` Tyler Hicks
2012-03-08 21:40 ` Andrew Morton
2012-03-08 21:49 ` Al Viro
2012-03-08 22:19 ` Andrew Morton
2012-03-08 22:33 ` Dave Jones
2012-03-08 22:45 ` Andrew Morton
2012-03-09 5:00 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2012-03-09 5:03 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2012-03-08 21:44 ` Al Viro
2012-03-08 22:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-03-08 22:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1334608126-17295-1-git-send-email-aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=jwboyer@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.or \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).