From: Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@linux.intel.com>
To: Sagi Shahar <sagis@google.com>
Cc: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@google.com>,
Ryan Afranji <afranji@google.com>,
Erdem Aktas <erdemaktas@google.com>,
Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@intel.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>, Peter Gonda <pgonda@google.com>,
Haibo Xu <haibo1.xu@intel.com>,
Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com>,
Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@google.com>,
Roger Wang <runanwang@google.com>,
Vipin Sharma <vipinsh@google.com>,
jmattson@google.com, dmatlack@google.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v5 10/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Adding test case for TDX port IO
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 2024 21:20:48 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1334f23c-2d9d-4d89-8b8e-98cf8d712daf@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231212204647.2170650-11-sagis@google.com>
On 12/13/2023 4:46 AM, Sagi Shahar wrote:
> From: Erdem Aktas <erdemaktas@google.com>
>
> Verifies TDVMCALL<INSTRUCTION.IO> READ and WRITE operations.
>
> Signed-off-by: Erdem Aktas <erdemaktas@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sagi Shahar <sagis@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ryan Afranji <afranji@google.com>
> ---
> .../kvm/include/x86_64/tdx/test_util.h | 34 ++++++++
> .../selftests/kvm/x86_64/tdx_vm_tests.c | 82 +++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 116 insertions(+)
One nit comment below.
Reviewed-by: Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@linux.intel.com>
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/tdx/test_util.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/tdx/test_util.h
> index 6d69921136bd..95a5d5be7f0b 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/tdx/test_util.h
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/tdx/test_util.h
> @@ -9,6 +9,40 @@
> #define TDX_TEST_SUCCESS_PORT 0x30
> #define TDX_TEST_SUCCESS_SIZE 4
>
> +/**
> + * Assert that some IO operation involving tdg_vp_vmcall_instruction_io() was
> + * called in the guest.
> + */
> +#define TDX_TEST_ASSERT_IO(VCPU, PORT, SIZE, DIR) \
> + do { \
> + TEST_ASSERT((VCPU)->run->exit_reason == KVM_EXIT_IO, \
> + "Got exit_reason other than KVM_EXIT_IO: %u (%s)\n", \
> + (VCPU)->run->exit_reason, \
> + exit_reason_str((VCPU)->run->exit_reason)); \
> + \
> + TEST_ASSERT(((VCPU)->run->exit_reason == KVM_EXIT_IO) && \
> + ((VCPU)->run->io.port == (PORT)) && \
> + ((VCPU)->run->io.size == (SIZE)) && \
> + ((VCPU)->run->io.direction == (DIR)), \
> + "Got unexpected IO exit values: %u (%s) %d %d %d\n", \
> + (VCPU)->run->exit_reason, \
> + exit_reason_str((VCPU)->run->exit_reason), \
> + (VCPU)->run->io.port, (VCPU)->run->io.size, \
> + (VCPU)->run->io.direction); \
> + } while (0)
> +
> +/**
> + * Check and report if there was some failure in the guest, either an exception
> + * like a triple fault, or if a tdx_test_fatal() was hit.
> + */
> +#define TDX_TEST_CHECK_GUEST_FAILURE(VCPU) \
> + do { \
> + if ((VCPU)->run->exit_reason == KVM_EXIT_SYSTEM_EVENT) \
> + TEST_FAIL("Guest reported error. error code: %lld (0x%llx)\n", \
> + (VCPU)->run->system_event.data[1], \
> + (VCPU)->run->system_event.data[1]); \
> + } while (0)
> +
> /**
> * Assert that tdx_test_success() was called in the guest.
> */
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/tdx_vm_tests.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/tdx_vm_tests.c
> index 8638c7bbedaa..75467c407ca7 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/tdx_vm_tests.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/tdx_vm_tests.c
> @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
>
> #include <signal.h>
> #include "kvm_util_base.h"
> +#include "tdx/tdcall.h"
> #include "tdx/tdx.h"
> #include "tdx/tdx_util.h"
> #include "tdx/test_util.h"
> @@ -74,6 +75,86 @@ void verify_report_fatal_error(void)
> printf("\t ... PASSED\n");
> }
>
> +#define TDX_IOEXIT_TEST_PORT 0x50
> +
> +/*
> + * Verifies IO functionality by writing a |value| to a predefined port.
> + * Verifies that the read value is |value| + 1 from the same port.
> + * If all the tests are passed then write a value to port TDX_TEST_PORT
> + */
> +void guest_ioexit(void)
> +{
> + uint64_t data_out, data_in, delta;
> + uint64_t ret;
> +
> + data_out = 0xAB;
> + ret = tdg_vp_vmcall_instruction_io(TDX_IOEXIT_TEST_PORT, 1,
> + TDG_VP_VMCALL_INSTRUCTION_IO_WRITE,
> + &data_out);
> + if (ret)
> + tdx_test_fatal(ret);
> +
> + ret = tdg_vp_vmcall_instruction_io(TDX_IOEXIT_TEST_PORT, 1,
> + TDG_VP_VMCALL_INSTRUCTION_IO_READ,
> + &data_in);
> + if (ret)
> + tdx_test_fatal(ret);
> +
> + delta = data_in - data_out;
> + if (delta != 1)
Nit: Is it more direct to compare data_in with 0xAC?
> + tdx_test_fatal(ret);
> +
> + tdx_test_success();
> +}
> +
> +void verify_td_ioexit(void)
> +{
> + struct kvm_vm *vm;
> + struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
> +
> + uint32_t port_data;
> +
> + vm = td_create();
> + td_initialize(vm, VM_MEM_SRC_ANONYMOUS, 0);
> + vcpu = td_vcpu_add(vm, 0, guest_ioexit);
> + td_finalize(vm);
> +
> + printf("Verifying TD IO Exit:\n");
> +
> + /* Wait for guest to do a IO write */
> + td_vcpu_run(vcpu);
> + TDX_TEST_CHECK_GUEST_FAILURE(vcpu);
> + TDX_TEST_ASSERT_IO(vcpu, TDX_IOEXIT_TEST_PORT, 1,
> + TDG_VP_VMCALL_INSTRUCTION_IO_WRITE);
> + port_data = *(uint8_t *)((void *)vcpu->run + vcpu->run->io.data_offset);
> +
> + printf("\t ... IO WRITE: OK\n");
> +
> + /*
> + * Wait for the guest to do a IO read. Provide the previous written data
> + * + 1 back to the guest
> + */
> + td_vcpu_run(vcpu);
> + TDX_TEST_CHECK_GUEST_FAILURE(vcpu);
> + TDX_TEST_ASSERT_IO(vcpu, TDX_IOEXIT_TEST_PORT, 1,
> + TDG_VP_VMCALL_INSTRUCTION_IO_READ);
> + *(uint8_t *)((void *)vcpu->run + vcpu->run->io.data_offset) = port_data + 1;
> +
> + printf("\t ... IO READ: OK\n");
> +
> + /*
> + * Wait for the guest to complete execution successfully. The read
> + * value is checked within the guest.
> + */
> + td_vcpu_run(vcpu);
> + TDX_TEST_CHECK_GUEST_FAILURE(vcpu);
> + TDX_TEST_ASSERT_SUCCESS(vcpu);
> +
> + printf("\t ... IO verify read/write values: OK\n");
> + kvm_vm_free(vm);
> + printf("\t ... PASSED\n");
> +}
> +
> int main(int argc, char **argv)
> {
> setbuf(stdout, NULL);
> @@ -85,6 +166,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
>
> run_in_new_process(&verify_td_lifecycle);
> run_in_new_process(&verify_report_fatal_error);
> + run_in_new_process(&verify_td_ioexit);
>
> return 0;
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-29 13:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 109+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-12 20:46 [RFC PATCH v5 00/29] TDX KVM selftests Sagi Shahar
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 01/29] KVM: selftests: Add function to allow one-to-one GVA to GPA mappings Sagi Shahar
2024-02-21 1:43 ` Binbin Wu
2024-07-23 19:55 ` Sagi Shahar
2024-03-21 22:29 ` Zhang, Dongsheng X
2024-07-23 19:56 ` Sagi Shahar
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 02/29] KVM: selftests: Expose function that sets up sregs based on VM's mode Sagi Shahar
2024-02-21 2:18 ` Binbin Wu
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 03/29] KVM: selftests: Store initial stack address in struct kvm_vcpu Sagi Shahar
2024-02-21 2:29 ` Binbin Wu
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 04/29] KVM: selftests: Refactor steps in vCPU descriptor table initialization Sagi Shahar
2024-02-21 5:43 ` Binbin Wu
2024-07-23 21:25 ` Sagi Shahar
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 05/29] KVM: selftests: Add helper functions to create TDX VMs Sagi Shahar
2024-02-22 9:24 ` Yan Zhao
2024-02-28 16:19 ` Binbin Wu
2024-03-21 22:54 ` Zhang, Dongsheng X
2024-04-12 5:34 ` Ackerley Tng
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 06/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Use KVM_TDX_CAPABILITIES to validate TDs' attribute configuration Sagi Shahar
2024-02-29 8:31 ` Binbin Wu
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 07/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Update load_td_memory_region for VM memory backed by guest memfd Sagi Shahar
2024-02-22 9:19 ` Yan Zhao
2024-07-24 16:42 ` Ackerley Tng
2024-07-25 18:19 ` Ackerley Tng
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 08/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Add TDX lifecycle test Sagi Shahar
2024-02-23 1:55 ` Chen Yu
2024-03-01 4:58 ` Yan Zhao
2024-03-01 7:36 ` Yan Zhao
2024-03-21 23:20 ` Zhang, Dongsheng X
2024-04-12 4:42 ` Ackerley Tng
2024-03-22 21:33 ` Chen, Zide
2024-07-25 19:52 ` Sagi Shahar
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 09/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Add report_fatal_error test Sagi Shahar
2024-02-29 12:31 ` Binbin Wu
2024-03-01 6:52 ` Binbin Wu
2024-07-25 20:37 ` Sagi Shahar
2024-03-01 12:09 ` Yan Zhao
2024-04-12 4:56 ` Ackerley Tng
2024-04-12 11:57 ` Yan Zhao
2024-04-15 8:05 ` Ackerley Tng
2024-04-15 10:09 ` Yan Zhao
2024-04-16 18:50 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-04-17 22:41 ` Yan Zhao
2024-04-22 21:23 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-07-28 11:16 ` Binbin Wu
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 10/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Adding test case for TDX port IO Sagi Shahar
2024-02-29 13:20 ` Binbin Wu [this message]
2024-03-04 2:19 ` Yan Zhao
2024-03-04 9:16 ` Binbin Wu
2024-03-04 9:18 ` Yan Zhao
2024-07-25 22:35 ` Sagi Shahar
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 11/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Add basic TDX CPUID test Sagi Shahar
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 12/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Add basic get_td_vmcall_info test Sagi Shahar
2024-03-01 6:03 ` Binbin Wu
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 13/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Add TDX IO writes test Sagi Shahar
2024-03-01 6:55 ` Binbin Wu
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 14/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Add TDX IO reads test Sagi Shahar
2024-03-01 8:22 ` Binbin Wu
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 15/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Add TDX MSR read/write tests Sagi Shahar
2024-03-01 12:00 ` Binbin Wu
2024-03-01 12:09 ` Binbin Wu
2024-03-05 0:22 ` Yan Zhao
2024-03-21 23:40 ` Zhang, Dongsheng X
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 16/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Add TDX HLT exit test Sagi Shahar
2024-03-02 7:31 ` Binbin Wu
2024-03-05 5:40 ` Yan Zhao
2024-07-27 23:23 ` Sagi Shahar
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 17/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Add TDX MMIO reads test Sagi Shahar
2024-03-05 7:09 ` Yan Zhao
2024-03-21 23:45 ` Zhang, Dongsheng X
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 18/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Add TDX MMIO writes test Sagi Shahar
2024-03-02 7:58 ` Binbin Wu
2024-03-05 8:58 ` Yan Zhao
2024-07-30 19:03 ` Sagi Shahar
2024-03-21 23:46 ` Zhang, Dongsheng X
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 19/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Add TDX CPUID TDVMCALL test Sagi Shahar
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 20/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Verify the behavior when host consumes a TD private memory Sagi Shahar
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 21/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Add TDG.VP.INFO test Sagi Shahar
2024-03-06 4:50 ` Yan Zhao
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 22/29] KVM: selftests: Add functions to allow mapping as shared Sagi Shahar
2024-03-05 11:09 ` Yan Zhao
[not found] ` <DS7PR11MB7886BD37E5E56DAB9A0087A3F6292@DS7PR11MB7886.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
2024-03-16 6:24 ` Chen, Zide
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 23/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Add shared memory test Sagi Shahar
2024-03-01 12:02 ` Yan Zhao
2024-03-06 1:36 ` Yan Zhao
2024-03-06 1:20 ` Yan Zhao
[not found] ` <DS7PR11MB7886AA5F8A19CDFCB5566B0EF6292@DS7PR11MB7886.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
2024-03-16 6:24 ` Chen, Zide
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 24/29] KVM: selftests: Expose _vm_vaddr_alloc Sagi Shahar
2024-03-04 9:55 ` Binbin Wu
2024-03-06 1:49 ` Yan Zhao
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 25/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Add support for TDG.MEM.PAGE.ACCEPT Sagi Shahar
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 26/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Add support for TDG.VP.VEINFO.GET Sagi Shahar
2024-03-04 13:56 ` Binbin Wu
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 27/29] KVM: selftests: Propagate KVM_EXIT_MEMORY_FAULT to userspace Sagi Shahar
[not found] ` <DS7PR11MB78860170A5FD77253573BC09F6292@DS7PR11MB7886.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
2024-03-14 21:46 ` Chen, Zide
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 28/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Add TDX UPM selftest Sagi Shahar
2024-03-05 4:57 ` Binbin Wu
2024-03-06 8:54 ` Yan Zhao
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 29/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Add TDX UPM selftests for implicit conversion Sagi Shahar
2024-06-05 18:38 ` [RFC PATCH v5 00/29] TDX KVM selftests Verma, Vishal L
2024-06-05 20:10 ` Sagi Shahar
2024-06-05 20:15 ` Verma, Vishal L
2024-06-05 20:18 ` Verma, Vishal L
2024-06-05 20:42 ` Sagi Shahar
2024-06-05 20:56 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2024-06-05 21:34 ` Sagi Shahar
2024-06-05 21:44 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2024-06-21 2:51 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2024-06-21 20:52 ` Sagi Shahar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1334f23c-2d9d-4d89-8b8e-98cf8d712daf@linux.intel.com \
--to=binbin.wu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ackerleytng@google.com \
--cc=afranji@google.com \
--cc=chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=erdemaktas@google.com \
--cc=haibo1.xu@intel.com \
--cc=isaku.yamahata@intel.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=pgonda@google.com \
--cc=runanwang@google.com \
--cc=sagis@google.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=vannapurve@google.com \
--cc=vipinsh@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).