linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	tglx@linutronix.de, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Subject: Re: Allow migration of mlocked page?
Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 16:08:57 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1337004537.2443.43.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1337003515.2443.35.camel@twins>


Anyway, afaict there's only two options:

 1) make mlock() mean physically pinned (which we've so far always
rejected and isn't supported by whatever passes as a std for unix -- at
least not by the precise wording).

 2) keep mlock() to mean no major fault.

I strongly prefer 2 -- its what we've always said.


This might mean there's a need for a stronger API -- one that also
guarantees physically pinned. This is a more expensive
resource/operation. It means we need to migrate all memory to UNMOVABLE
blocks, possibly growing the number of such blocks with all the
down-sides that has.

Alternatively -- in case we pick 1 -- we should create a weaker variant
that does what mlock means now in order to allow people to not pressure
the system unduly. 

I don't see any other way.. the current constraints really are mutually
exclusive.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-05-14 14:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-05-11  4:37 Allow migration of mlocked page? Minchan Kim
2012-05-11  9:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-11 16:20   ` Christoph Lameter
2012-05-11 23:24     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-05-14 13:45       ` Christoph Lameter
2012-05-14  4:13   ` Minchan Kim
2012-05-14  6:56     ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-14  7:37       ` Minchan Kim
2012-05-14  7:45         ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-14  7:49           ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-14  7:54             ` Minchan Kim
2012-05-14 13:47         ` Christoph Lameter
2012-05-15  1:23           ` Minchan Kim
2012-05-15 11:07             ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-11 13:14 ` Mel Gorman
2012-05-11 23:25   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-05-14 13:32     ` Mel Gorman
2012-05-14 13:51       ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-14 14:01         ` Christoph Lameter
2012-05-14 14:14           ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-14 14:43             ` Christoph Lameter
2012-05-14 22:52               ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-05-14 23:04             ` Roland Dreier
2012-05-15 14:27               ` Christoph Lameter
2012-05-15  1:38           ` Minchan Kim
2012-05-14 14:08         ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2012-05-14 23:06       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-05-15  1:35       ` Minchan Kim
2012-05-14  4:25   ` Minchan Kim
2012-05-14 13:39     ` Mel Gorman
2012-05-15  2:15       ` Minchan Kim
2012-05-15  4:33         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-05-15 11:06           ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-15 14:12             ` Christoph Lameter
2012-05-15 14:45               ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-15 15:11                 ` Christoph Lameter
2012-05-15 14:10           ` Christoph Lameter
2012-05-15 14:09         ` Christoph Lameter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1337004537.2443.43.camel@twins \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=minchan@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).